El-Mariachi Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1892888,00.html The death toll among Iraqis as a result of the US-led invasion has now reached an estimated 655,000, a study in the Lancet medical journal reports today. The figure for the number of deaths attributable to the conflict - which amounts to around 2.5% of the population - is at odds with figures cited by the US and UK governments and will cause a storm, but the Lancet says the work, from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, has been examined and validated by four separate independent experts who all urged publication. Cheers Bush/Blair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenH Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Only today we hear of bodies being left all over the city and of more bombs. The people doing the killing aren't Bush and Blair, they are the terrorists killing the people of Iraq. These terrorists are killing the people of Iraq in vast numbers for any reason they can think of. I can see how there might be a lame justification (not one I would agree with) for saying that an Iraqi who kills a US soldier is fighting an invader, but what cn the justification be for the Iraqi and foreign terrorists killing their own people in vast numbers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
borninsheffield Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Unfortunately there are going to be deaths, it's WAR...sorry iraq was an invasion. Politically incorrect to call it a war. It needed to be done. Lets look forward on rebuilding their country now and giving them back freedom now that Saddam is no longer in power. Well done Brittish and American Army's! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bladesufc1 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1892888,00.html Cheers Bush/Blair But not all that is by the invading forces:loopy: there is nearly a civil war going on you know:thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
borninsheffield Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Have a look at this - Iraq Hero. Shows we have heart! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jabberwocky Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 I wonder how many times the phrase containing "Omelette and breaking eggs" will be mentioned... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Mariachi Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 But not all that is by the invading forces:loopy: there is nearly a civil war going on you know:thumbsup: Mmm if you remove the existing establishment and cant replace it with one that can maintain law and order, then who is responsible ? The Dalai Lama ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barny_100 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Mmm if you remove the existing establishment and cant replace it with one that can maintain law and order, then who is responsible ? The Dalai Lama ? So you approved of Saddam's methods of "maintaining law and order" then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bladesufc1 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Have a look at this - Iraq Hero. Shows we have heart! Wouldn't it make a change if these images appeared all over the world, to show the Muslims that were there to help not hinder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bladesufc1 Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Mmm if you remove the existing establishment and cant replace it with one that can maintain law and order, then who is responsible ? The Dalai Lama ? unfortunatly all the MUSLIM TV Stations are showing the other side oif the war, the MADE up side.... hence why they currently hate the USA & UK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.