VARB Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 http://www.wwf.org.uk/news/n_0000003006.asp Typical bloody CONservatives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angle20 Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 The logos of all the main political parties should consist of something like the following: £££ $$$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donkey Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Well, no suprise there. Like Blair, Cameron is all for a better World - until there's a conflict of interests with multi-national profits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxman Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 All Political parties need money to exist. Money comes from big business and wealthy donors. Not hippies! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lizzmobile Posted September 24, 2006 Share Posted September 24, 2006 Leave us hippies alone, ya big bully Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angle20 Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Going slightly away from the original topic (though I'm sure the OP won't mind) - a spot of bad publicity for the holier-than-thou Liberal Democrats also: "Jail sentence for Lib Dem donor": http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5379286.stm Brown, who is based in Spain, became the Lib Dems' biggest donor before the general election Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pk014b7161 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 the mans a t*** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFKvsNixon Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 the mans a t*** Care to expand on these impressive thoughts, if you can of course? Who? Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barny_100 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Little thing you fail to mention - this is a piece of ridiculous legislation requiring all chemicals to be tested even if they have been in use for years with no ill effects! So far I can't stand Cameron but I'm afriad I'm with him on this if he gets the MEP's to vote against this legislation. There is perhaps no better example of this problem than the EU’s gigantic chemicals regulation known as Reach, whose final adoption is expected by the end of 2006. Many improvements have been made, but Reach still has flaws that will hurt small European businesses and foreign companies in particular...some of Reach’s key provisions will apply to chemicals to which there is no human exposure — and thus no possibility of harm. At the same time, the proposal exempts certain highly toxic chemicals where there is serious human exposure and much known existing harm. The latter group includes chemicals such as gasoline and diesel fuels — which, without an exemption, would likely be blacklisted by Reach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.