badboyracer Posted September 23, 2006 Share Posted September 23, 2006 i started a new job a while ago, and second day working there maneger said you carnt work till you get the situation sorted out due to we use the home office policy, The situation= i was adopted and the home office would not accept my adoption birth certificate with both my new perants names on, they would only acept a full birth certificate with my bio perants on which i have not got, I tryed to sort the situation out with the home office by phone and did not ever get good feedback, i know home office as to have there rules, but i was born in the uk and have had other jobs and payed tax! I even went to see mr david blunkett and asked hime if he was aware of the policy while he was home secutary and he ad no idear of it, and was all mouth but no action saying he will try and sort the situation soon as possible with the home office and sed it was another nail on the head, 3 weeks later he sent me the infomation which the home office sent me! how nice! So i ad to get a passport to prove who iam, now i have got it im now looking for a new job. Home office seems to me like its ran with a office full of chimps lol Im now trying to get loss of earnings from the home office, and i was wondering if any other person as ad a problem with them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterw Posted September 23, 2006 Share Posted September 23, 2006 I feel for you, I really do. Some time ago the Daily Telegraph published an article on the Charity Commission which said — not in these words — that its staff was (not maybe) made up of Home Office cast-offs, so if the cast-offs went to other government departments, what the heck have the Home Office got now! Mainly chimps, I suppose — which is probably what your would-be employers have got in their policy-making department. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
logiebaird Posted September 23, 2006 Share Posted September 23, 2006 Yep - v similar - asked why an Asian and a Female were required to front 15k in a business deal involving a govt department. The deal was awarded to a white male who was exempted from finding the 15k deposit. MP referred to DOTI minister (McArtney) McArtney said everything ok so referred to Home office - They responsed with an enquiry number so referred to Police - They dont seem to have a clue how to process evidence which a superintendent name of Joan Williams returns to sender so back to MP and Home office. Blunkett says MP should help but MP refuses so referred back to Blunkett explaining he was wrong and no response. Only asked why my wife had to foot the 15k when the white guy didnt Sounds like sex and race discrimination or corruption to me but whatever the story it seems to have the backing of all the local politicians and law enforcers. Would still still like an answer from any MP Minister Home Office DOTI or Chief constable or even Chris Tarrant if we can get it as a question on Millionaire. Legal aid board refuse help on the basis that they require me to provide info which i cant access. This govt is well and truly f***** up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badboyracer Posted September 23, 2006 Author Share Posted September 23, 2006 This govt is well and truly f***** up WELL SED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.