cloudybay Posted September 6, 2006 Share Posted September 6, 2006 Does this man qualify as numpty of the year? Read on...........http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/5320092.stm At least we now know why Naz had to vacate his cell.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiesh Posted September 6, 2006 Share Posted September 6, 2006 It beggars belief what folk will do to avoid a speeding conviction!!! First there was that woman who told police someone else was driving when they had a lovely picture of her...... now this guy!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BluePolo Posted September 6, 2006 Share Posted September 6, 2006 The last line really made me laugh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiesh Posted September 6, 2006 Share Posted September 6, 2006 Anybody considering avoiding a speeding fine by giving incorrect information to the police have a look at THIS :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlebasher Posted September 6, 2006 Share Posted September 6, 2006 All that and it wasnt even a speed camera, he wasnt going to get any points anyway! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upinwath Posted September 6, 2006 Share Posted September 6, 2006 All that and it wasnt even a speed camera, he wasnt going to get any points anyway! The soft sod. Still I see it this way. If you can't see a 10 foot yellow camera what chance has a kid got ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don_Kiddick Posted September 6, 2006 Share Posted September 6, 2006 And attacking it from the front where the lenses were filming! What a pud! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leg-end Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/5320092.stm He should not have been speeding, but the comment at the end is entirely right: "Let the punishment fit the crime," she said. "Let's hope he benefits from the government tagging scheme and comes home on tagging after only doing a quarter or a fifth of his sentence like Prince Naseem." Why should Nasem be out after very nearly killing someone and this guy serve anything like four months...4 hours should be about right! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pumatic Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Why should Nasem be out after very nearlt killing someone and this guy serve anything like four months...4 hours should be about right! There is no greater crime than interfering with the government revenue stream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenH Posted September 7, 2006 Share Posted September 7, 2006 Doing anything with explosives in the current climate and getting only 4 months is quite a result for him. They could easily have locked him away for that long before he even got to trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.