Longcol Posted July 30 Share Posted July 30 Just now, Top4719 said: There isn't a case yet whats the point, lets leave him anonymous then, you obviously think he deserves it. No - just the law of the land. https://www.cps.gov.uk/crime-info/youth-crime "The identity of a child aged between 10 and 17 charged with a crime will not be disclosed outside the court. Those permitted inside the court include the usual participants in cases heard in court; ranging from officers of the court, to the parties, parents and guardians, and bona fide members of the press. Reporting restrictions include not revealing the name, home address or school of any young person concerned in the proceedings, or particulars – including photographs - which may make identifying them likely. They will remain anonymous throughout proceedings but these restrictions can be challenged – usually by the media – after proceedings have ended." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longcol Posted July 30 Share Posted July 30 3 minutes ago, Top4719 said: Now have a read of this, the Southport case defintely fits the bill, hiding behind techniclities is a nonsense in cries of this severity: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47721177 Read it - which part says the identity of an under 18 year old can be released except by order of the court? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackey lad Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 2 hours ago, Delbow said: If there's one good thing that's come from it, it's this Good . Proper retribution for an idiot trying to goad the Police . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Bundy Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 I wonder why the police didn't retreat like they at the Leeds riot? Didn't a chief of Police say it's a tactic they use to quell disturbances? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Bundy Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 8 hours ago, Delbow said: If there's one good thing that's come from it, it's this That's so funny, I can't stop watching it, 😂 What an absolute Muppet 😂😂😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cressida Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 7 hours ago, Longcol said: Read it - which part says the identity of an under 18 year old can be released except by order of the court? I'm sure I read early on in the thread that someone posted the killer was a 20 year old black guy, could be the police said it was a 17year old to avoid reprisals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cressida Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 Why didn't the police use watercannon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
echo beach Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 10 minutes ago, cressida said: Why didn't the police use watercannon? Cost of water? Rates are high!😀 echo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butlers Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 The only force with watercannon were the Met another waste of money 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hauxwell Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 The last lot of water cannons which Boris bought when he was the mayor of London was sold as scrap, I don’t think they were ever used. I do think the police could do with a few water cannons this day and age, the only thing the police seem to have to protect themselves against rioters is body armour and riot shields to push protesters back. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now