Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
24 minutes ago, Axe said:

Rightly so.  But I doubt Alex Chalk is looking at ways to allow guilty Postmasters to cash in.

Why not because it should be  Fujitsu who pay the compensation as their wonderful Horizon program was totally  responsible for all the grief.

Of course the CEO of Fujitsu just happens to be a government minister's husband so the tories won't like that solution either.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Axe said:

The convictions are easy to prove but it is less easy to prove that every conviction is a miscarriage of justice. 

Since Horizon is no longer trusted, all cases linked to Horizon need to be quashed, whether they are innocent or guilty.

Edited by El Cid
Posted
10 minutes ago, El Cid said:

Since Horizon is no longer trusted, all cases linked to Horizon need to be quashed, whether they are innocent or guilty.

Fair comment.  But the new ones coming forward are  doing so because they want to be given a large amount of money and are jumping on the bandwagon.   

 

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Axe said:

Fair comment.  But the new ones coming forward are  doing so because they want to be given a large amount of money and are jumping on the bandwagon.   

 

If anyone gets a payout they aren’t entitled to, well frankly, so what if that’s the price to pay to compensate all innocent postmasters who had their lives torn apart.  It’s a one off exceptional circumstance and steps need to be taken to ensure  that nothing like this ever happens again.

Edited by pfifes
Posted
31 minutes ago, Axe said:

Fair comment.  But the new ones coming forward are  doing so because they want to be given a large amount of money and are jumping on the bandwagon.   

 

Good for them. I hope they get sizable payouts.

They deserve it. 

Posted
29 minutes ago, Axe said:

Fair comment.  But the new ones coming forward are  doing so because they want to be given a large amount of money and are jumping on the bandwagon.   

 

Since the Horizon system wasn't recording transactions correctly, any claims the Post Office made about wrong doing based on the records of those transactions on the Horizon system can't be considered reliable. If there's no proof of guilt, they should be compensated.

57 minutes ago, ECCOnoob said:

Putting aside that the victims deserve more damages payment which is not something I would dispute.... 

 

... snip ...

 

Blame the government, blame the Post office blame Fujitsu for their negligence, but I'm not buying this whole "greedy lawyers" shtick.

It's also worth pointing out that the Post Office deliberately dragged the cases out as long as possible to make it as expensive as possible for the sub-postmasters in order to discourage others affected from contesting the accusations against them.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Organgrinder said:

Why not because it should be  Fujitsu who pay the compensation as their wonderful Horizon program was totally  responsible for all the grief.

Of course the CEO of Fujitsu just happens to be a government minister's husband so the tories won't like that solution either.

It's not that simple. When are people going to realise its not some single head that's going to roll for this. Doesn't work like that. It's institutional failure across multiple agencies hundreds, if not thousands of people potentially involved and incidents occurring over many years. 

 

Whilst Fujitsu was the supplier of the defective IT system, it was ultimately the state owned post office who implemented the system, failed to properly audit it, monitor it, brought the criminal prosecutions, maintained a hardline stance during the litigation. 

 

At best you might get a handful of Fujitsu employees who might be found guilty of perjury if they all sufficiently found to have knowingly lied to the court. However, as for the wider organisation, it's just a piece of kit that is produced as one of their many products of many subsidiaries of many companies under the umbrella of their multi trillion Yen organisation.

 

Oh, just for factual record, Keegan didn't take up position of UK CEO of Fujitsu until 2014, which was already after concerns had been raised about the validity of the prosecutions and they'd already been steps to set up a mediation scheme for postmasters.  I wouldn't get too excited about seeing 'minister's husband toppled' because quite what direct involvement He'd have in the failure at that stage is probably very little.

Posted
35 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Good for them. I hope they get sizable payouts.

They deserve it. 

It's not just this scandal, the Government failed to pay out compensation for the infected blood products

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, El Cid said:

It's not just this scandal, the Government failed to pay out compensation for the infected blood products

Why am I not surprised by that..

Posted
51 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Good for them. I hope they get sizable payouts.

They deserve it. 

Only the genuine victims deserve a sizeable payout.  Those jumping on the bandwagon deserve less  than nothing. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      207,463
    • Most Online
      1,653

    Newest Member
    Yogi_
    Joined
  • Tell a friend

    Love Sheffield Forum? Tell a friend!
  • ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.