Doncaster City

[cuttsie]

A member Cmonkes has revieled a private message I sent him on the forum  message system  this makes the whole thing invalid . Any comments appreciated.

Edited January 25 by cuttsie

[The_DADDY]

That's rather bad form in my view 

[Mr Bloke]

24 minutes ago, cuttsie said:

A member Cmonkes has revieled a private message I sent him on the forum  message system  this makes the whole thing invalid . Any comments appreciated.

Hmmm...

I agree... having a PM system completely undermines the whole point of it being a public forum.

 

Maybe members should be restricted to PM'ing mods/admin only...

... that way we'd probably get less squabbling caused by the 'behind the scenes activities' that are obviously going on.

[cuttsie]

9 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

That's rather bad form in my view 

It is so far below the belt its ground level .

[The_DADDY]

Just now, cuttsie said:

It is so far below the belt its ground level .

I'd have to agree. To me it's akin to sharing  a personal letter or email without the consent of the other party. 

 

[crookesey]

11 hours ago, cuttsie said:

A member Cmonkes has revieled a private message I sent him on the forum  message system  this makes the whole thing invalid . Any comments appreciated.

He should be banned, but is unlikely to even receive a slapped wrist.

[cuttsie]

2 minutes ago, crookesey said:

He should be banned, but is unlikely to even receive a slapped wrist.

We will have to see  ,

[crookesey]

16 minutes ago, cuttsie said:

We will have to see  ,

Perhaps all pm’s sent should be receipted as ‘pm sent by …….. to……. by forum admin, that at least proves their existance.

 

[steve68]

1 hour ago, crookesey said:

He should be banned, but is unlikely to even receive a slapped wrist.

Bannings a bit harsh, I've had a few random people I don't know, messaging me support recently, over some contentious 

issues, personally I'd never repost a P'M good or bad, but I can't see it as such heinous act that would be a cause for a Ban.

 

is it like an unwritten rule,  like stitches for snitches? the Forum is a bit like a playground since they slackened down from the old guards t tighter moderation. 

I have had a quick look at the sites terms couldn't see anything relating to this, which does seem odd, so I may have overlooked it

or it could just be the site Mods don't want to be bogged down with trivial petty squabbles of it users.

 

 

Edited January 26 by steve68

[HeHasRisen]

He didnt post it word for word tbf

 

https://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/topic/478235-sheffield-wednesday-v-ipswich/?do=findComment&comment=8493473

 

[BigAl1]

I think much depends on what was revealed and a blanket ban is unwarranted.

[Sheridan1-0]

27 minutes ago, HeHasRisen said:

He didnt post it word for word tbf

 

https://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/topic/478235-sheffield-wednesday-v-ipswich/?do=findComment&comment=8493473

 

Regardless of how much of said private message has been posted ...it goes against the whole point of having a private message system..any private messages should remain exactly that...