Jump to content

Coronavirus - Part Three

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, RJRB said:

@top4718

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_association_footballers_who_died_while_playing

Rather than using your drip  feed method you can pick out the cases post possible vaccine.

There's a whole host of reasons for the deaths on there, the sole reason with the unprecedented numbers at the moment are heart related.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Danish newspaper has issued an apology for its journalistic failure by only publishing official government messages with out questioning them, I wonder where else this has been happening!!!

 

Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO)  "Two doses of the vaccine offer very limited protection if any".

 

A judge has denied an application to the ONS for release of child death numbers caused by the vaccine, I wonder why that would be.

 

Roll on January 26th.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

You would like that , wouldn’t you 

No. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, top4718 said:

There's a whole host of reasons for the deaths on there, the sole reason with the unprecedented numbers at the moment are heart related.

What unprecedented numbers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, top4718 said:

There's a whole host of reasons for the deaths on there, the sole reason with the unprecedented numbers at the moment are heart related.

9 heart related July 2012 - June 2013.

 

9 heart related in 2021.

 

Unprecedented??

Edited by Longcol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, top4718 said:

 

 

Total and utter garbage.

Self awareness, at last.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, top4718 said:

As I asked the poster last night, do you actually read these things before you post them:

 

The latest vaccine data collated for November has shown that 75% of players across the EFL are either fully vaccinated, have had a single jab or intend to be vaccinated. Double vaccinated players total 59%, 16% are set to get the jab, while 25% of players currently do not intend to get a vaccine.

 

Are the EFL the "thought police" now, they should employ Tom Cruise's character from Minority Report.

 

Total and utter garbage.

Can you work out for yourself why vaccine figures are at a higher percentage for the top European divisions including The Premiership  than for the lower levels.

Its always more telling when you do so.

And still no major reported heart issues.

Edited by RJRB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, HumbleNarrator said:

So it WAS a lab-leak after all, and the scientific community knew right from the beginning but chose to cover it up.  

Hi, what new evidence is this please

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Delbow said:

Hi, what new evidence is this please

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/01/11/scientists-believed-covid-leaked-wuhan-lab-feared-debate-could/

 

Scientists believed Covid leaked from Wuhan lab - but feared debate could hurt ‘international harmony’

Leading British and US scientists thought it was likely that Covid accidentally leaked from a laboratory but were concerned that further debate would harm science in China, emails show.
The new details came to light after members of the US Republican House Oversight Committee were granted access to the documents, after complaining that their content had been heavily redacted when released under Freedom of Information requests.

1. The following emails were sent to Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Francis Collins of the US National Institutes of Health on 1-4 February 2020.

Sir Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, said that “a likely explanation” was that Covid had rapidly evolved from a Sars-like virus inside human tissue in a low-security lab.
Sir Jeremy said that other scientists also believed the virus could not have evolved naturally.
One such scientist was Professor Mike Farzan, of Scripps Research, the expert who discovered how the original Sars virus binds to human cells.
The emails also show that Bob Garry, of the University of Texas, was unconvinced that Covid-19 emerged naturally.“I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature,” he said.

Scientists were particularly concerned by a part of Covid-19 called the furin cleavage site, a section of the spike protein which helps it enter cells and makes it so infectious to humans.
Professor Andrew Rambaut, from the University of Edinburgh, also said that furin cleavage site “strikes me as unusual”.

2.The emails also show that by February 2 2020, scientists were already trying to shut down the debate into the laboratory leak theory.
A leading scientist (Dr Ron Fouchier) told Sir Jeremy that “further debate would do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular”. Dr Collins, the former director of the US National Institutes of Health, warned it could damage “international harmony”.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...-debate-could/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, HumbleNarrator said:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/01/11/scientists-believed-covid-leaked-wuhan-lab-feared-debate-could/

 

Scientists believed Covid leaked from Wuhan lab - but feared debate could hurt ‘international harmony’

Leading British and US scientists thought it was likely that Covid accidentally leaked from a laboratory but were concerned that further debate would harm science in China, emails show.
The new details came to light after members of the US Republican House Oversight Committee were granted access to the documents, after complaining that their content had been heavily redacted when released under Freedom of Information requests.

1. The following emails were sent to Dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Francis Collins of the US National Institutes of Health on 1-4 February 2020.

Sir Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, said that “a likely explanation” was that Covid had rapidly evolved from a Sars-like virus inside human tissue in a low-security lab.
Sir Jeremy said that other scientists also believed the virus could not have evolved naturally.
One such scientist was Professor Mike Farzan, of Scripps Research, the expert who discovered how the original Sars virus binds to human cells.
The emails also show that Bob Garry, of the University of Texas, was unconvinced that Covid-19 emerged naturally.“I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature,” he said.

Scientists were particularly concerned by a part of Covid-19 called the furin cleavage site, a section of the spike protein which helps it enter cells and makes it so infectious to humans.
Professor Andrew Rambaut, from the University of Edinburgh, also said that furin cleavage site “strikes me as unusual”.

2.The emails also show that by February 2 2020, scientists were already trying to shut down the debate into the laboratory leak theory.
A leading scientist (Dr Ron Fouchier) told Sir Jeremy that “further debate would do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular”. Dr Collins, the former director of the US National Institutes of Health, warned it could damage “international harmony”.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...-debate-could/

That's not new. This study is newer, and weakens the lab leak theory because it appears to evidence a natural explanation for the ACE2 receptor and furin cleavage site, although the Nature article notes that at the time the Pasteur Institute study had not been peer reviewed. The lab leak theory is still on the table and can't be discounted at this point, but boldly saying "It was a lab leak" is unhelpful and wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deja vu?

 

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/live/2022/jan/14/novak-djokovic-news-live-visa-cancelled-australia-2022-australian-open-tennis-latest-updates-immigration-minister-alex-hawke

 

The Australian immigration minister, Alex Hawke, has again cancelled Novak Djokovic’s visa.

We begin with Hawke’s statement, saying he “carefully considered” information provided to him:

Today I exercised my power under section 133C(3) of the Migration Act to cancel the visa held by Mr Novak Djokovic on health and good order grounds, on the basis that it was in the public interest to do so.

This decision followed orders by the Federal Circuit and Family Court on 10 January 2022, quashing a prior cancellation decision on procedural fairness grounds.

In making this decision, I carefully considered information provided to me by the Department of Home Affairs, the Australian Border Force and Mr Djokovic.

The Morrison Government is firmly committed to protecting Australia’s borders, particularly in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.

I thank the officers of the Department of Home Affairs and the Australian Border Force who work every day to serve Australia’s interests in increasingly challenging operational environments.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.