Jump to content

COVID THREAD

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, steve68 said:

I might turn pro at the end of the year, it feels odd not having to pay Tax on the winnings  

given i play no risk free events to get tickets to big prize pools. up over 2k this year from zero investment

No tax ? No risk?

Sweet👌

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RJRB said:

That press conference was as cringe worthy as Prince Andrews.

The lady medical expert studiously avoided his gaze .

If only someone could have stood up and said “Stop the BS Donald”,

But you cant say that to the POTUS can you

 

 

Everything Trump does and says is cringeworthy to lefties, socialists, communists, islamists and globalists.

 

He scares the hell out of 'em!

 

That's why he has a lot of support!  :)

Edited by trastrick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sibon said:

I don't know whether anyone is actually interested in information and stuff. If you are, maybe you might like to read this interesting article about the ways that Covid might change medicine.

 

 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/20/how-covid-created-a-vision-for-treating-disease?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

 

Alternatively, just carry on with the clown show.

Yes it is interesting and it reflects how there can be unexpected beneficial spin offs from research plus of course what can be achieved if funds are available.

In the past there have been many instances of drugs that have been developed for a particular complaint then being found useful in another direction.

39 minutes ago, trastrick said:

Everything Trump does and says is cringeworthy to lefties, socialists, communists, islamists and globalists.

 

He scares the hell out of 'em!

 

That's why he has a lot of support!  :)

Putin seemed unimpressed,but there again he did support his campaign.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Delayed said:

As has been said numerous times on this thread but clearly ignored for comedic purposes...

 

The vaccine doesn't prevent transmission

Biden, Fauci, Gates and many more claimed it did and not just the once. The Royals have been very pro vaccination, a vaccine that's supposed to prevent transmission (remember how some said vax passports made them feel safe) yet members of that family seeming to be passing it to one another. TBH I very much doubt they will have injected the monarchy with experimental pharma junk in any case.

3 hours ago, Delayed said:

All myths.

 

Speaking of lies

 

Care to explain why everyone who's had the vaccine haven't died from it? Dr. Tops said we all have months before the vaccine killed us.

 

 

 

 

If you can find where I said that in anything other than jest I'll happily take it back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, melthebell said:

Biden wasnt in office when the jab was first introduced, trump was, and he was pretty anti vaxx at the time too

 

Wrong. They held it back until after the election purposely so Biden would get the credit.

 

That turned out well 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, RJRB said:

The past as far as this Forum is still available

Check the various discussions around June ‘20 onwards as masks were being made compulsory.

You perhaps don’t remember as I cannot see any contributions from you around this time regarding vaccine trials,masks or anything.

The Daddy neither.

This is the second thread on this subject (not sure what happened to the first) I spoke at length about how the principle of masks was the same - to stop harmful matter entering the lungs, be that viral particles, dust, chemicals, asbestos etc, the grading of the mask reflects the circumstance in which it is to be used in construction this is arrived at by a risk assessment, the mask type will be sent to the main contractors H&S dept for them to approve, once they do approve them they'll request proof of face fit training by the individual wearing them.

 

I can think of no instances in the last 15 years where the flimsy masks worn by the majority would have been deemed acceptable.

 

I was told I was lying and didn't know what I was talking about - there you have the level of debate from the gullible, it was good to be proved right though. 

Edited by top4718

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest sibon
16 minutes ago, top4718 said:

This is the second thread on this subject (not sure what happened to the first) I spoke at length about how the principle of masks was the same - to stop harmful matter entering the lungs, be that viral particles, dust, chemicals, asbestos etc, the grading of the mask reflects the circumstance in which it is to be used in construction this is arrived at by a risk assessment, the mask type will be sent to the main contractors H&S dept for them to approve, once they do approve them they'll request proof of face fit training by the individual wearing them.

 

I can think of no instances in the last 15 years where the flimsy masks worn by the majority would have been deemed acceptable.

 

I was told I was lying and didn't know what I was talking about - there you have the level of debate from the gullible, it was good to proved right though. 

Except that you've not been proven right.

 

Nor have you understood the purpose of the face masks that responsible citizens wear.

 

Instead, you've cried like a baby at distancing, masks and vaccines. Yet you are happy to accept the freedoms that they have bought.

 

Well done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, sibon said:

Except that you've not been proven right.

 

Nor have you understood the purpose of the face masks that responsible citizens wear.

 

Instead, you've cried like a baby at distancing, masks and vaccines. Yet you are happy to accept the freedoms that they have bought.

 

Well done.

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

:thumbsup:

Haha the Guardian reader pipes up, offers absolutely nothing to prove what he says, zero, zilch, nada just arrogance and the dim give it the thumbs up 🤣 no wonder the Government have had this easy.

 

For the record on masks worn by the majority, I have been proven right, they don't work, never have never will and he can produce nothing to counter that, tell him to stick his post where the sun don't shine.

 

I don't need to "buy freedoms" they were never anyone's to take away.

Edited by top4718

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest sibon
2 hours ago, trastrick said:

Everything Trump does and says is cringeworthy to lefties, socialists, communists, islamists and globalists.

 

He scares the hell out of 'em!

 

That's why he has a lot of support!  :)

That must be why he is still president then.

 

Trump and Corbyn.  Misunderstood twins.

5 minutes ago, top4718 said:

Haha the Guardian reader pipes up, offers absolutely nothing to prove what he says, zero, zilch, nada just arrogance and the dim give it the thumbs up 🤣 no wonder the Government have had this easy.

 

For the record on masks worn by the majority, I have been proven right, they don't work, never have never will and he can produce nothing to counter that, tell him to stick his post where the sun don't shine.

 

I don't need to "buy freedoms" they were never anyone's to take away.

You are scientifically incorrect in your claims about masks. I linked to some evidence about that yesterday. No serious commentator doubts that they work.

 

The rest of your post is just incoherent. It's a noticeable pattern. Why do you become incoherent at this time of night? 

Edited by sibon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, top4718 said:

Haha the Guardian reader pipes up, offers absolutely nothing to prove what he says, zero, zilch, nada just arrogance and the dim give it the thumbs up 🤣 no wonder the Government have had this easy.

 

For the record on masks worn by the majority, I have been proven right, they don't work, never have never will and he can produce nothing to counter that, tell him to stick his post where the sun don't shine.

 

I don't need to "buy freedoms" they were never anyone's to take away.

Just for clarity I have Never read the Guardian. I have said many times on this forum that I don’t read newspapers apart from occasionally seeing the Sheffield Star . So that’s another thing you are wrong about . No arrogance here . Agreeing  with another poster is not arrogant . Arrogance is saying “ I was right , I was right “ without a shred of evidence 

Edited by hackey lad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, top4718 said:

Biden, Fauci, Gates and many more claimed it did and not just the once. The Royals have been very pro vaccination, a vaccine that's supposed to prevent transmission (remember how some said vax passports made them feel safe) yet members of that family seeming to be passing it to one another. TBH I very much doubt they will have injected the monarchy with experimental pharma junk in any case.

If you can find where I said that in anything other than jest I'll happily take it back.

So 3 people who aren't medical or scientific are more important that the Vaccine developers or our own chief medical and scientific officer's who haven't said that it prevents transmission?

 

No one has been injected with experimental pharma junk and it's just you making things up.

 

Ah great disclaimer

 

'I didn't say that thing but if I did say that thing, then I was joking' 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.