Jump to content


Mask Required?

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, HeHasRisen said:

Crack on and do as you please, ...

You seem to be encouraging antisocial behaviour despite your assertion you were just pointing out the rules are not being enforced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read it that way, that is your perogative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

masks , screens and visors are a waste of time unless you are in really close contact and even then minimal, wake up people and smell the roses this is a con to control.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Carbuncle said:

You seem to be encouraging antisocial behaviour despite your assertion you were just pointing out the rules are not being enforced.

Personally, I'd say that compulsory masking is anti-social.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, onewheeldave said:

Personally, I'd say that compulsory masking is anti-social.

Not as anti-social as potentially infecting someone with covid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Longcol said:

Not as anti-social as potentially infecting someone with covid.

Getting covid is now just another risk of going outdoors. Deal with it or stay inside. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Tomm06 said:

Getting covid is now just another risk of going outdoors. Deal with it or stay inside. 

Be careful mate you’ll have the ranks of the retired hanging up on you because they believe everything the BBC tells, if they actually got out there they’d see the picture is very different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, top4718 said:

Be careful mate you’ll have the ranks of the retired hanging up on you because they believe everything the BBC tells, if they actually got out there they’d see the picture is very different.

Was out in Central London last night and most people seemed to be wearing a mask on the tube.  There is lots of information about the pros of face coverings. Have read some independent websites as well as Sky, BBC ect.  Full Fact is a good site to read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, top4718 said:

Be careful mate you’ll have the ranks of the retired hanging up on you because they believe everything the BBC tells, if they actually got out there they’d see the picture is very different.

So how can you "see" covid and its effects on individuals - without access to an intensive care unit or similar? No-ones claiming people are dropping dead in the street.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Longcol said:

Not as anti-social as potentially infecting someone with covid.

Personally I would say that compulsory masking is as anti social as potentially being used as a transmission aid by a virus. Compulsory masking in the context of a virus like covid carries sufficient risk in terms of serious impact on civil liberty to outweigh the relatively minor [zero if outdoors] increase in transmission risk.

2 hours ago, Zinger549 said:

Was out in Central London last night and most people seemed to be wearing a mask on the tube.  There is lots of information about the pros of face coverings. Have read some independent websites as well as Sky, BBC ect.  Full Fact is a good site to read.

Well, if 'most people' are doing it, it must be good then :)

You're lucky you weren't in Germany in the late 1930's if you're swayed by what 'most people' are doing.

There is lots of information about the alleged pros of masking, sadly not so much about the cons of compulsory masking, though a fair bit of censorship and mislabeling towards anyone who attempts to talk about it.

You think Sky and the BBC and independant websites?! Wow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, onewheeldave said:

Personally I would say that compulsory masking is as anti social as potentially being used as a transmission aid by a virus. Compulsory masking in the context of a virus like covid carries sufficient risk in terms of serious impact on civil liberty to outweigh the relatively minor [zero if outdoors] increase in transmission risk.

 

Nothing impacts as much on your civil liberties as catching a potentially deadly virus, made more likely indoors from an unmasked person.

 

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/213573/coronavirus-more-likely-spread-inside-through/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest sibon
4 minutes ago, Longcol said:

Nothing impacts as much on your civil liberties as catching a potentially deadly virus, made more likely indoors from an unmasked person.

 

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/213573/coronavirus-more-likely-spread-inside-through/

Yes, but Imperial are a mainstream university. They’ve been paid off by someone or other.

 

Got any links from the Univ ov Life?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.