Guest sibon #745 Posted July 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, Carbuncle said: C'mon he's a mask evading liar. We don't all have to adopt Sibon's delicacy. I’ve never been called delicate before. Thank you. He is a liar though. That’s evidenced in the exchange that I’ve just had with him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
butlers 259 #746 Posted July 18, 2021 The fact you had " a giggle" your friend was going to avoid the Covid protocol at Tramlines. Theres other far more offensive stuff you have posted too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Guest makapaka #747 Posted July 18, 2021 (edited) 11 minutes ago, The_DADDY said: I can read thanks. people who cannot put on, wear or remove a face covering because of a physical or mental illness or impairment, or disability where putting on, wearing or removing a face covering will cause you severe distress if you are physically or mentally impaired, or it causes you severe distress? does that apply to you? Or do you just not want to? no need for any details. Edited July 18, 2021 by makapaka Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
The_DADDY 3,461 #748 Posted July 18, 2021 4 minutes ago, Carbuncle said: 1. You tell lies: you denied having stated that 99.9%+ survive covid Let me correct you. No I didn't. I denied putting 99.9+% I denied putting 99.9% A very important + was missed out either deliberately or accidentally by the poster I quoted. You're welcome 👍 4 minutes ago, butlers said: The fact you had " a giggle" your friend was going to avoid the Covid protocol at Tramlines. Theres other far more offensive stuff you have posted too. Er, yeah. That was a joke. Sorry it went over your head 👍 8 minutes ago, sibon said: I’ve never been called delicate before. Thank you. You're welcome 😘 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Carbuncle 0 #749 Posted July 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, The_DADDY said: Let me correct you. No I didn't. I denied putting 99.9+% I denied putting 99.9% A very important + was missed out either deliberately or accidentally by the poster I quoted. Don't be a weasel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
The_DADDY 3,461 #750 Posted July 18, 2021 8 minutes ago, sibon said: Snipped.... That’s evidenced in the exchange that I’ve just had with him. The only thing evidenced in that exchange was that you discriminate against people who you feel should wear a mask. Then you had a hissy fit when challenged on it. Just now, Carbuncle said: Don't be a weasel. Oh dear. More name calling. That's pretty childish don't you think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Guest sibon #751 Posted July 18, 2021 2 minutes ago, The_DADDY said: The only thing evidenced in that exchange was that you discriminate against people who you feel should wear a mask. Then you had a hissy fit when challenged on it. You’re funny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Carbuncle 0 #752 Posted July 18, 2021 (edited) 6 minutes ago, The_DADDY said: 6 minutes ago, Carbuncle said: Don't be a weasel. Oh dear. More name calling. That's pretty childish don't you think? I was not accusing you of actually being a weasel (name calling) I was pointing out the attempt to avoid the charge of lying was weasel-like. Edited July 18, 2021 by Carbuncle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
The_DADDY 3,461 #753 Posted July 18, 2021 3 minutes ago, Carbuncle said: I was not accusing you of being a weasel (name calling) I was pointing out the attempt to avoid the charge of lying was weasel-like. And it was aimed at?.......... Oh, that's right. Me. Don't worry though. I'm not offended. I hear mask wearers and the pro jab crew say some absolutely vile things whilst still trying the claim the moral highground. You know the type. They are the "I'm wearing this to protect you" and "I'm getting jabbed to protect you" type of people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Carbuncle 0 #754 Posted July 18, 2021 4 minutes ago, The_DADDY said: And it was aimed at?.......... Oh, that's right. Me. Don't worry though. I'm not offended. I hear mask wearers and the pro jab crew say some absolutely vile things whilst still trying the claim the moral highground. You know the type. They are the "I'm wearing this to protect you" and "I'm getting jabbed to protect you" type of people. Ok, ok, you're not a liar in the same way that Bill Clinton was not lying when he said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
The_DADDY 3,461 #755 Posted July 18, 2021 17 minutes ago, Carbuncle said: Ok, ok, you're not a liar in the same way that Bill Clinton was not lying when he said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Oh dear. Be careful. Scraping the barrel that low can damage your finger nails. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Carbuncle 0 #756 Posted July 18, 2021 10 minutes ago, The_DADDY said: 28 minutes ago, Carbuncle said: Ok, ok, you're not a liar in the same way that Bill Clinton was not lying when he said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." Oh dear. Be careful. Scraping the barrel that low can damage your finger nails. And all this because you did not want to say the 99.9%+ was an exaggeration issued in the heat of the moment and for which you had no argument, no data and no source. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...