Jump to content

Hillsborough Trial Collapses

Recommended Posts

What a sorry ,sorry tale.

 

The upshot being the only conviction was SWFC club Sec  on 1 count of breaking health and safety rules.

£6,500 fine.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, butlers said:

What a sorry ,sorry tale.

 

The upshot being the only conviction was SWFC club Sec  on 1 count of breaking health and safety rules.

£6,500 fine.

 

£6,500 fine for all those lives lost 32 years ago? Que?! :rant: 

 

Nowhere near enough IMO, should've been £6.5 Million (at least)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone else want to pluck a number out of thin air?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Mr Allen said:

£6,500 fine for all those lives lost 32 years ago? Que?! :rant: 

 

Nowhere near enough IMO, should've been £6.5 Million (at least)

 

Meh, and what would that have solved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So they got off on a technicality?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, geared said:

So they got off on a technicality?

The judge ruled their was no case to be answered, also stated a complete waste of public money which could have been spent elsewhere.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doe's that mean there will be a riot in Liverpool tonight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A decision of convenience ! The judge knows a guy whose friend knows a guy who was a high ranked Police Officer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They were accused of misleading a public inquiry (to make SYP look better) which, it turns out, isn't the criminal offence of perverting the course of justice they were charged with, since the inquiry wasn't a court. So really the case should never have bought, and the judge was right to throw it out.

 

So the particular behaviour being prosecuted was arguably reprehensible, but not criminal.

 

Note that this case is unrelated to whether anyone should be been prosecuted for actions / inactions on the day which caused the deaths.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Runningman said:

A decision of convenience ! The judge knows a guy whose friend knows a guy who was a high ranked Police Officer.

Well no, the charges were erronious. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Runningman said:

A decision of convenience ! The judge knows a guy whose friend knows a guy who was a high ranked Police Officer.

You DO of course have proof of this accusation??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.