Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Would that be Brietbarts UK representative, and publisher of anti global warming hogwash .

And regards masks as " face nappies"

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And claimed " masks are ineffective".

And advised his 86 year old father not to get vaccinated.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, butlers said:

Would that be Brietbarts UK representative, and publisher of anti global warming hogwash .

And regards masks as " face nappies"

 

No, it's Nina, a medical receptionist from a 20,000-patient medical centre in the North of England, dealing with up to 1,000 patients a day. 

4 hours ago, butlers said:

And claimed " masks are ineffective".

And advised his 86 year old father not to get vaccinated.

 

To the best of my knowledge, Nina doesn't identify with either of those descriptors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No but the interviewer does.

It's just being plain about where his aim lies.

Also the subject of the interview has had her voice altered and name changed .

The story from the headline on the pod is a cover up of adverse vaccine reactions unless you are going to tell me it's not so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Yosemite Sam said:

No, it's Nina, a medical receptionist from a 20,000-patient medical centre in the North of England, dealing with up to 1,000 patients a day. 

To the best of my knowledge, Nina doesn't identify with either of those descriptors.

Nina should be reported to the police for failure to report attempted murder/manslaughter.

Nina is conspiring with others to knowingly cause harm as she is directing people to have vaccination in her practice leading to

"...hundreds of deaths..."

"...thousands and thousands of adverse reactions...".

Laughing her way through the interview-why? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Haven't listened to it but not wildly surprised by what you post Annie.

It's such tosh it would be downright weird if there had not been " adverse reactions' after near 35 million plus vaccinations.

The definition of adverse reaction is extremely broad ,from memory a third of the reported cases were pain at the site of the injection.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, butlers said:

Haven't listened to it but not wildly surprised by what you post Annie.

It's such tosh it would be downright weird if there had not been " adverse reactions' after near 35 million plus vaccinations.

The definition of adverse reaction is extremely broad ,from memory a third of the reported cases were pain at the site of the injection.

 

When a train crash occurs causing 75 deaths and 150 injuries, the clamour for an enquiry is unavoidable. When an event takes place in the UK in which the government admits to having caused 800,000 injuries and 1200 deaths, don't you think it's odd in the extreme that the national press, the BBC, ITV and Sky News decline to even mention? Those of us with a smidgeon of common sense are entitled to wonder what is behind the cover up and, it seems, the only place we can get answers is through brave people like Nina who can provide some (if not all) the explanations as to what's going on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Annie Bynnol said:

Nina should be reported to the police for failure to report attempted murder/manslaughter.

Nina is conspiring with others to knowingly cause harm as she is directing people to have vaccination in her practice leading to

"...hundreds of deaths..."

"...thousands and thousands of adverse reactions...".

Laughing her way through the interview-why? 

 

 

You would be absolutely correct were it not for one factor you've overlooked: The RT. Hon. Boris Johnson MP, the Rt. Hon. Matthew Hancock MP, Professor Chris Witty and Professor Patrick Vallance are already under investigation by the International Court of Human Rights for alleged crimes against humanity (bet you didn't know that!) It is therefore right that justice should be allowed to run its course before we start blaming people like Nina for not speaking out, especially when the brainless minority refer to her testimony as "tosh,"  just as Butlers did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Yosemite Sam said:

You would be absolutely correct were it not for one factor you've overlooked: The RT. Hon. Boris Johnson MP, the Rt. Hon. Matthew Hancock MP, Professor Chris Witty and Professor Patrick Vallance are already under investigation by the International Court of Human Rights for alleged crimes against humanity (bet you didn't know that!) It is therefore right that justice should be allowed to run its course before we start blaming people like Nina for not speaking out, especially when the brainless minority refer to her testimony as "tosh,"  just as Butlers did.

How do you know if it's a secret?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tinfoilhat said:

How do you know if it's a secret?

It's no secret; it was reported in the press.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Yosemite Sam said:

It's no secret; it was reported in the press.

Can I have link?

 

I'll read it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.