alchresearch   214 #25 Posted September 9, 2020 (edited) 3 hours ago, prince al said: Has this debacle ever happened before in Sheffield? There was the Sevenstone farce.  https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/developer-pulls-out-of-sevenstones-scheme And this is a good read:  Sheffield: A city locked in a drawn-out retail battle Undelivered city centre schemes and attempts to block out-of-town developments are hampering Sheffield’s regeneration https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/sheffield-a-city-locked-in-a-drawn-out-retail-battle Edited September 9, 2020 by alchresearch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
nightrider   13 #26 Posted September 9, 2020 14 hours ago, kaytie said: Omnishambles!  I read that it wasn't realised that the site used to be a reservoir!  Ffs I can recall that it was a reservoir when I was a little kid!   Of course they knew it was. They just ignored it. Another contractor told them not to build there, but they went with a cheaper rival who said "no problem". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mogster   10 #27 Posted September 9, 2020 There’s another big hole on the other side of Northumberland Rd that has been subject to attempted development that was abandoned. There’s often a good reason why high value land hasn’t been built on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Annie Bynnol   612 #28 Posted September 9, 2020 9 hours ago, alchresearch said: There was the Sevenstone farce.  https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/developer-pulls-out-of-sevenstones-scheme And this is a good read:  Sheffield: A city locked in a drawn-out retail battle Undelivered city centre schemes and attempts to block out-of-town developments are hampering Sheffield’s regeneration https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/sheffield-a-city-locked-in-a-drawn-out-retail-battle A lot has happened in the seven years these articles were written. Some has been complete with much more in various stages of constructions. This thread is about a private construction gone wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
The Joker   10 #29 Posted September 9, 2020 9 hours ago, nightrider said: Of course they knew it was. They just ignored it. Another contractor told them not to build there, but they went with a cheaper rival who said "no problem". Typical penny-pinching Sheffielders 🤣 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
AndrewC   307 #30 Posted September 10, 2020 (edited) On 08/09/2020 at 19:52, kaytie said: Omnishambles!  I read that it wasn't realised that the site used to be a reservoir!  Ffs I can recall that it was a reservoir when I was a little kid!   Of course they knew there was a reservoir there... Their issue relates to not properly designing for that fact.   On 09/09/2020 at 00:17, AlexHudson39 said: A setback, but nothing more. This will be a great new addition for Sheffield Uni and the design is very elegant.   I've no doubt the issues will be resolved and in a decade or mores time people will have largely forgotten about this, but to refer to this as nothing more than a setback is a truly heroic stretch of positive thinking! Getting this far in to the build of quite a large building only to discover someone has screwed up so badly that it needs to be taken down again - that is quite a major setback. Even if the extra construction costs are covered somehow by insurance, the University are still going to suffer by way of this facility being probably 6-12 months behind schedule now?   On 09/09/2020 at 09:50, alchresearch said: There was the Sevenstone farce.  https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/developer-pulls-out-of-sevenstones-scheme And this is a good read:  Sheffield: A city locked in a drawn-out retail battle Undelivered city centre schemes and attempts to block out-of-town developments are hampering Sheffield’s regeneration https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/sheffield-a-city-locked-in-a-drawn-out-retail-battle This is about a private-developer scheme that hasn't been properly engineered/designed and so needs to be partly or fully taken down. How does that relate to the retail quarter situation?   Edited September 10, 2020 by AndrewC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
butlers   261 #31 Posted September 15, 2020 We are not alone ,that glittering city across the hills is also taking down abrand new block of apartments as they are also unsound Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Wazzock   10 #32 Posted September 16, 2020 21 hours ago, butlers said: We are not alone ,that glittering city across the hills is also taking down abrand new block of apartments as they are also unsound which proves the 'only happens here' stuff is codswallop..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Pacman38   0 #33 Posted June 27, 2021 Unless you are a qualified structural or geotechnical engineer you should really not speculate on matters you know nothing about. BAM are still main contractor on this scheme so those commenting that Kier are back on the job know nothing. Normally on projects like this the piling contractor is responsible for both the design and construction of the pile foundations, the engineers just provide the loads and performance specification eg what the maximum settlement should be. For those on this forum claiming the architects are responsible and not competent, HLM design multi-million pound University buildings all over the UK, have an excellent track record and years of experience on schemes like this. HLM will have had nothing at all to do with the supervision or design of the foundations, this responsibility normally sits with the piling contractor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
BigAl1   143 #34 Posted June 28, 2021 11 hours ago, Pacman38 said: Unless you are a qualified structural or geotechnical engineer you should really not speculate on matters you know nothing about. BAM are still main contractor on this scheme so those commenting that Kier are back on the job know nothing. Normally on projects like this the piling contractor is responsible for both the design and construction of the pile foundations, the engineers just provide the loads and performance specification eg what the maximum settlement should be. For those on this forum claiming the architects are responsible and not competent, HLM design multi-million pound University buildings all over the UK, have an excellent track record and years of experience on schemes like this. HLM will have had nothing at all to do with the supervision or design of the foundations, this responsibility normally sits with the piling contractor. Anyone would think you had a connection to HLM design Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
HeHasRisen   3,403 #35 Posted June 28, 2021 Aye I am glad the thread got bumped 9 months after the last post for him to tell us that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
geared   317 #36 Posted June 28, 2021 Imagine having to take to a little internet forum to rep your company after it got a little bit of criticism.  Says alot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...