Jump to content

The Labour Party - Part 2

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Anna B said:

Angela Rayner showing how it should be done on Prime Ministers Quesrions.

Playing to the  crowd 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

Playing to the  crowd 

Why not? Boris does it every week. Fight fire with fire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Anna B said:

Why not? Boris does it every week. Fight fire with fire.

She’s playing to the crowd, with no substance 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, hackey lad said:

She’s playing to the crowd, with no substance 

You think Boris has substance?  🤗 He's just a jumped up showman. 

Starmer plays a straight bat and is made to look weak because of it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Anna B said:

You think Boris has substance?  🤗 He's just a jumped up showman. 

Starmer plays a straight bat and is made to look weak because of it. 

Boris is abroad at the moment with world leaders , where is Starmer ?  And if you believe Starmer plays with a straight bat , more fool you 

Edited by hackey lad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, hackey lad said:

Boris is abroad at the moment with world leaders , where is Starmer ?  And if you believe Starmer plays with a straight bat , more fool you 

Well, at least he takes it seriously, which is more than Boris does.

 

As for Boris being abroad at the moment, it's because people were daft enough to make him prime minister. It's nothing to do with ability as we've seen....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Anna B said:

Well, at least he takes it seriously, which is more than Boris does.

 

As for Boris being abroad at the moment, it's because people were daft enough to make him prime minister. It's nothing to do with ability as we've seen....

Does he take it seriously? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Anna B said:

Well, at least he takes it seriously, which is more than Boris does.

 

As for Boris being abroad at the moment, it's because people were daft enough to make him prime minister. It's nothing to do with ability as we've seen....

Wow.   That is quite some arrogance you have there.   So in your mind, everyone who voted for this current leader and government is a moronic imbecile who shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the voting booth.

 

Let me guess, you know best, they should have all voted for your beloved saintly downtrodden Corbyn who would have saved the world,  prevented Covid from ever happening and single-handedly tripled the wealth of every ordinary citizen...... dream on.

 

Rayner is nothing more than some mouthy mare who falls apart as soon as she has to make any real decisions.  As for the great leader of the opposition, I strongly suspect he will be one of many revolving door leaders in continuing Saga of the dented warring factions of the current Labour Party.

 

Government in waiting? The resolution to all our problems? Don't make me laugh.

 

Last time I checked the polling, the Tories may well of took a hard knock, but labour still couldn't form enough to smash the majority threshold. If they can't even manage to take a substantial lead when there are all these Tory scandals and controversies what are they good for?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

Does he take it seriously? 

I think he does, he's had a humour bypass and he's rubbish, but he takes his role seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Anna B said:

I think he does, he's had a humour bypass and he's rubbish, but he takes his role seriously.

You think , shame his own party doesn’t 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

You think , shame his own party doesn’t 

The sooner Labour get rid of Starmer the better. He was supposed to be the safe, respectable, electable answer to 'mad marxist' Corbyn. Not worked out very well has it?

Edited by Anna B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Anna B said:

The sooner Labour get rid of Starmer the better. He was supposed to be the safe, respectable electable answer to 'mad marxist' Corbyn. Not worked out very well has it?

Yet you defend him  :suspect:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.