Jump to content

Coronavirus - Part Two.

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Delayed said:

Feel free to provide anything that counters the narrative I've posted. 

 

Or keep making baseless claims which everyone can easily prove wrong...

You can prove anything when you've got £352m to fund the BS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, top4718 said:

You can prove anything when you've got £352m to fund the BS.

Continuing with the baseless claims then.

 

You set them up, we'll knock them down.

 

To anyone that is following this thread and not contributing. Please take note of the lack of any evidence (true or not) to substantiate any claims made and then make your own minds up.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Delayed said:

Continuing with the baseless claims then.

 

You set them up, we'll knock them down.

 

To anyone that is following this thread and not contributing. Please take note of the lack of any evidence (true or not) to substantiate any claims made and then make your own minds up.

 

 

You'll knock them down because (as I've explained before) you've gone that far down the road of being hoodwinked you'll never admit it no matter what.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest sibon

Man who denies that covid is serious, also denies that vaccine is safe, also denies that “spaz” is an offensive term.

 

Also has a friend who thinks that Africa is a country. And that it is poor.

 

I think we can rest there for this evening. It’s been very illuminating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, top4718 said:

According to the Investors Chronicle (how reliable they are I don't know) £352m was used by the government to pay the media, 165% more than what was spent pre-covid, no wonder the MSM dances to the tune.

It isn't clear from the Investors Chronicle article who received the £352 million, it would appear most may have gone to companies in the USA rather than the "MSM" - where they spent the money isn't clear - obviously not all spent on covid advertising.

 

https://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/news/2021/05/19/media-and-tech-companies-reap-rewards-from-government-s-covid-advertising-drive/

 

It's a fraction of the total advertising spend in the UK of £23.5 billion in 2020.

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/262754/advertising-revenue-in-the-uk/#:~:text=Advertising expenditure in the United,percent compared to previous year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, sibon said:

Man who denies that covid is serious, also denies that vaccine is safe, also denies that “spaz” is an offensive term.

 

Recently posts a vid of a "Molecular Biologist" who turns out to be a self described clairvoyant.

 

https://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/topic/473199-coronavirus-part-two/page/831/?tab=comments#comment-8456284

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just imagine in a normal winter flu season if deaths within 28 days of having it had been added to the statistics, would we have had the same hysteria we have now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, top4718 said:

Just imagine in a normal winter flu season if deaths within 28 days of having it had been added to the statistics, would we have had the same hysteria we have now.

If you would prefer to count deaths from covid based on death certificates then the count goes up by twenty odd thousand. 'Died within 28 days of testing positive' did not create the pandemic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, top4718 said:

Just imagine in a normal winter flu season if deaths within 28 days of having it had been added to the statistics, would we have had the same hysteria we have now.

again read up on what covid does to the body and how it works then come back to the after 28 days after testing positive arguement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, top4718 said:

Just imagine in a normal winter flu season if deaths within 28 days of having it had been added to the statistics, would we have had the same hysteria we have now.

True.

1 hour ago, Carbuncle said:

If you would prefer to count deaths from covid based on death certificates then the count goes up by twenty odd thousand. 'Died within 28 days of testing positive' did not create the pandemic.

How about just counting the actual deaths that were actually caused by covid?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, onewheeldave said:

How about just counting the actual deaths that were actually caused by covid?

It's not a possibility. Death caused by covid cannot be made precise. Cause of death is an approximate kind of thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.