Coronavirus - Part Two.

[top4718 838]

7 minutes ago, butlers said:

Ok had a look at NPR, a bit if CNBC  and the NYT before hitting the paywall.

I find no mention of vaccinated people carry more viral load.

The reason is it is Not  what the CDC said .

 

What the CDC did say was in rare cases of breakthrough transmission the viral load might be similar.

The CDC reckons in fully vaccinated people 70 plus percent will not get Covid.

Combine that with the scientific reports from 3 countries that the load is much lower.

 

 

Your making this up as you go along, if that’s the case why are some states requesting reintroducing mask wearing for the vaccinated, stop kidding yourself man 😂

 

Again all the main US news channels ran this two days ago, CNBC have a full article on it if you want to websearch.

Edited July 30, 2021 by top4718

[butlers 259]

Your claim was the vaccinated carry more viral load.

Based on. what?

 

[butlers 259]

Well mask use is recommended in places like ,say Florida where only half the people are fully vaccinated and the test positivity rate is second highest in the US and nearly 3.5 times what level is regarded as safe to remove restrictions

[Guest]

18 minutes ago, top4718 said:

No ones pulling any strings, us workers that leave our houses on a daily basis and don’t have our heads polluted by the Guardian can see it’s been totally exaggerated. For what ends is yet to be revealed but some sort of digital ID seems to be a front runner (your far right conspiracy theorists predicted this months ago).

Fascinating.  Please expand on the section of your post I've made bold.

Edited July 30, 2021 by Guest

[top4718 838]

10 minutes ago, Hecate said:

Fascinating.  Please expand on the section of your post I've made bold.

No, it clearly states a possible intention, make of it what you will, I can guarantee though the ones being pro vaccine passports will be the first to complain should a digital ID be a result.

[Guest]

30 minutes ago, top4718 said:

No, it clearly states a possible intention, make of it what you will, ...

No, you won't expand on the section I highlighted in your post?  I'm just asking you to clarify the notion of a link between an 'exaggeration' and a 'digital ID'.  Where did you read about this connection, and the 'possible intention'?  Who's suggesting that a digital ID is a 'front runner'?

 

I'm not interested in hearing about Guardian readers and complaining vaccine passport supporters.  I am interested in your argument.

 

 

[The_DADDY 3,461]

Absolutely no long term safety testing done. 

The jab isn't even past its trials 

There are lots of adverse reactions 

Pharmaceutical companies not help liable for adverse reactions.... 

Yet this creature states this...... 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-58014779.amp

 

This is horrific. Anyone who advocates jabbing kids or pregnant mums with this experimental cocktail should be struck off. 

Edited July 30, 2021 by The_DADDY

[tinfoilhat 11]

1 minute ago, The_DADDY said:

Absolutely no long term safety testing done. 

The jab isn't even past its trials 

There are lots of adverse reactions 

Pharmaceutical companies not help liable for adverse reactions.... 

Yet this creature states this...... 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-58014779.amp

 

This is horrific. Anyone who advocates jabbing kids or pregnant mums with this experimental cocktail should be struck off. 

Do you think I'll die in 2 years? 80% of north east derbyshire adult residents have had both jabs.  I know you think you're going to get discriminated against because you won't get jabbed, but if we alĺ die we there won't be any pubs or big events because of the mass death.

 

I did read that quite a few non vaccinated pregnant women are in hospital with covid (and nowt else). You won't believe that though will you.

[hackey lad 3,955]

" Creature" . Someone working in the Nursing profession and has done for years . You really are letting your side down .

[The_DADDY 3,461]

5 minutes ago, tinfoilhat said:

 

 

I did read that quite a few non vaccinated pregnant women are in hospital with covid (and nowt else). You won't believe that though will you.

Absolutely I won't believe it. 

It's just one more lie of many lies being told that people lap up. 

Go for a trip to Rotherham General and see for yourself. 

It's eye opening. 

3 minutes ago, hackey lad said:

" Creature" . Someone working in the Nursing profession and has done for years . You really are letting your side down .

Anyone who thinks it's OK to be  Injecting pregnant women with an experimental jab is vile 

So yeah, I think creature is an accurate description. 

Edited July 30, 2021 by The_DADDY

[hackey lad 3,955]

3 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Absolutely I won't believe it. 

It's just one more lie of many lies being told that people lap up. 

Go for a trip to Rotherham General and see for yourself. 

It's eye opening. 

Anyone who thinks it's OK to be  Injecting pregnant women with an experimental jab is vile 

So yeah, I think creature is an accurate description. 

Whats eye opening at Rotherham Hospital?  

[Longcol 598]

6 minutes ago, The_DADDY said:

Absolutely I won't believe it. 

It's just one more lie of many lies being told that people lap up. 

Go for a trip to Rotherham General and see for yourself. 

It's eye opening. 

 

So what will you see at Rotherham DGH?