Coronavirus - Part Two.

[Longcol 594]

1 minute ago, top4718 said:

This has been asked before, unfortunately the rise of social media has made it very, very difficult to discern what is reliable, what I do know is that the BBC is the most despicable broadcaster outside North Korea, I will enjoy every second of its inevitable demise.

So you haven't a clue what is reliable then.

[top4718 838]

3 minutes ago, Longcol said:

So you haven't a clue what is reliable then.

No and I've said that before on this thread, you have to make your own judgement. The BBC, Channel 4 and Sky should be closed with immediate effect.

[Longcol 594]

3 minutes ago, top4718 said:

No and I've said that before on this thread, you have to make your own judgement. 

But we're wanting to know what you base your judgement on. You must be getting your information from somewhere.

 

 

[top4718 838]

1 minute ago, Longcol said:

But we're wanting to know what you base your judgement on. You must be getting your information from somewhere.

 

 

Your bombarded with literally hundreds of stats a day, check out the ones you want and see how reliable they look (its very difficult) but when the government is paying the MSM they are the last places you go.

[Longcol 594]

1 minute ago, top4718 said:

Your bombarded with literally hundreds of stats a day, check out the ones you want and see how reliable they look (its very difficult) but when the government is paying the MSM they are the last places you go.

Newspapers don't get government funding - are they reliable?

[top4718 838]

Just now, Longcol said:

Newspapers don't get government funding - are they reliable?

😆 Absolutely not, does anybody even buy them these days.

[Longcol 594]

Just now, top4718 said:

😆 Absolutely not, does anybody even buy them these days.

Yes - but people mainly read the online versions.

 

But what makes them unreliable? They're not funded by the government.

[top4718 838]

27 minutes ago, Longcol said:

Yes - but people mainly read the online versions.

 

But what makes them unreliable? They're not funded by the government.

They're owned by the likes of Murdoch though.

[swarfendor437 14]

This is well worth reading:

 

https://www.silentmajority.co.uk/FormerPfizerVP.pdf

[Longcol 594]

1 minute ago, top4718 said:

They're owned by the likes of Murdoch though.

Not all of them.

 

But do you know who is behind whatever sources you get your information from?

 

Back in the days of 9/11 threads an awful lot of Conspiracy Theorists would quote RT as a source - for the simple fact that it told a different story to the western "MSM". There would appear to be an lot of disinformation spread from Russia etc on social media for example.

[Longcol 594]

1 minute ago, swarfendor437 said:

This is well worth reading:

 

https://www.silentmajority.co.uk/FormerPfizerVP.pdf

That would be Mike Yeadon who last year said the Covid Virus would be over in July 2020. Once he was shown to be wrong he has "done a Wakefield" and has gone full on conspiracy fruitcake.

[swarfendor437 14]

Well there's worse to come:

 

https://usawatchdog.com/big-alien-lie-revealed-steve-quayle/