Jump to content

Sheff Council - Shalesmoor Road Layout

Recommended Posts

Regarding the committee system, the majority party would not always get a vote through as the majority of councilors are not sheep, they are elected representatives who are quite sensible,(unlike some, or at least one, in the planning department---See Shalesmoor Fiasco).

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, RJRB said:

I think that you have done your share of thread hi jacking.

Its about the logic and suitability of a hastily enacted scheme using public money.

You have defended the system that enabled it and passed responsibility to national and local politicians.

Asking sensible people to make sensible decisions is a reasonable view.

So strictly on the thread topic do you agree that it was a misguided waste of public money?

That sounds a bit like them being thrown under the bus to Me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, busdriver1 said:

That sounds a bit like them being thrown under the bus to Me. 

Not going to argue with a bus driver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, busdriver1 said:

That sounds a bit like them being thrown under the bus to Me. 

How does a politician making their own decision equate to being thrown under a bus?

2 hours ago, Gligs said:

Regarding the committee system, the majority party would not always get a vote through as the majority of councilors are not sheep, they are elected representatives who are quite sensible,(unlike some, or at least one, in the planning department---See Shalesmoor Fiasco).

 

 

 

 

You don’t understand how political parties work do you? They have a whip system, just like the parliamentary party and anything important will get voted through by the majority party.

 

And you haven’t pointed to a major city where your committee system has been implemented. Where has it been implemented?

Edited by Planner1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Planners ......not a clue ....still living in a dream world ....waste of time and a waste of money ...who ever the money came from ...would have been better giving away free bus fares ....for who ever wanted it ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid idea by a stupid council finally being removed and a stupid explanation to boot enough said 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Planner1 said:

How does a politician making their own decision equate to being thrown under a bus?

You don’t understand how political parties work do you? They have a whip system, just like the parliamentary party and anything important will get voted through by the majority party.

 

And you haven’t pointed to a major city where your committee system has been implemented. Where has it been implemented?

Now what were you saying about hi jacking a thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I'd like to know, and hopefully Planner1 will be able to help here, is what metrics SCC have been measuring during the trial (ie number of cyclists using the lane, reduction in vehicular transport as a result of greater cycle use, impact on traffic flow, journey times etc) and what criteria would have to be met for it to be declared a success.

 

Specifically what outcomes, agreed before the trial would need to be seen for SCC  to make the cycle lane permanent.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@NewBizYou're 'avin a larf, aren't you - there was NO forward planning or measurement scheduled, it was a hasty, ill-conceived idea from the off, and even Planner1 won't be able to wriggle away from that - although it isn't really up to him to do so as he wasn't involved in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, RollingJ said:

@NewBizYou're 'avin a larf, aren't you - there was NO forward planning or measurement scheduled, it was a hasty, ill-conceived idea from the off, and even Planner1 won't be able to wriggle away from that - although it isn't really up to him to do so as he wasn't involved in it.

Surely any organisation fit to be in charge of public funds has a clear set of criteria by which they measure the merits or otherwise of any proposed schemes? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, NewBiz said:

Surely any organisation fit to be in charge of public funds has a clear set of criteria by which they measure the merits or otherwise of any proposed schemes? 

🤣🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, NewBiz said:

Surely any organisation fit to be in charge of public funds has a clear set of criteria by which they measure the merits or otherwise of any proposed schemes? 

One would think so wouldn’t one 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.