PRESLEY   1,228 #1 Posted January 10, 2020 On the 1pm news the other day the news showed mother and daughters faces whilst talking to the media outside court but on the 6pm news they hid their faces and now on interviews they cant be identified, could a forum legal eagle explain this, its all a bit strange.  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Stranza   10 #2 Posted January 10, 2020 Nal. I think most media are respecting the victims wish for anonymity. I believe her. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
PRESLEY   1,228 #3 Posted January 10, 2020 17 minutes ago, Stranza said: Nal. I think most media are respecting the victims wish for anonymity. I believe her. Im not on about believe or disbelieve, Im on about they havealready shown who they are  outside the court house when the mother was saying her piece, so why hide them now.  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Branyy   10 #4 Posted January 10, 2020 24 minutes ago, Stranza said: Nal. I think most media are respecting the victims wish for anonymity. I believe her. What victim? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
PRESLEY Â Â 1,228 #5 Posted January 10, 2020 Or is it alleged victim ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Branyy   10 #6 Posted January 10, 2020 The investigation of the rape was dropped. On the other hand, the girl got a suspended sentence for false accusations. The only victim here are those guys. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Tomm06   12 #7 Posted January 10, 2020 53 minutes ago, Branyy said: The investigation of the rape was dropped. On the other hand, the girl got a suspended sentence for false accusations. The only victim here are those guys. She claims the authorities pressured or even forced her in to claiming they were false allegations. I imagine this will go on for some time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Branyy   10 #8 Posted January 10, 2020 AFAIK, she claimed that, police disagreed and it was discussed over the court. Of course, if she feels mistreated she can push it to the European court. At the moment, I don't see a reason not to trust the judge. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Guest makapaka   #9 Posted January 10, 2020 5 minutes ago, Branyy said: AFAIK, she claimed that, police disagreed and it was discussed over the court. Of course, if she feels mistreated she can push it to the European court. At the moment, I don't see a reason not to trust the judge. I agree with this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
alchresearch   214 #10 Posted January 10, 2020 I've heard a few references to a video taken at the time. Was that used in the trial? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Waldo   96 #11 Posted January 10, 2020 I heard that it's potentially politically motivated. That Syria are more bothered about fostering good relations with Israel, than with the UK. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
willman   10 #12 Posted January 10, 2020 13 minutes ago, alchresearch said: I've heard a few references to a video taken at the time. Was that used in the trial? IIRC several of the men had their phones checked,some on request and a couple voluntarily int heir own defence. It was at this point after viewing the phone evidence i believe that the Cypriot police encouraged her to change her statement. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...