Jump to content

What If A Member Of Royal Family Was A Pedo?

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Longcol said:

You win the Interwebs this week!

 

And as a bonus big ears wouldn't be next in line.

Just shows how this lot are always shiftin the goal post.  Edward had to abdicate over divorcee Mrs Simpson but big ears is next in line after marrying Camilla a divorcee. :suspect: Just think if Mrs Simpson had been Queen,  Bart would have been next in line. :hihi:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ridgewalk said:

That was the working definition of paedophilia in my professional life, since then however the definition seems to have broadened. 

Not so much the definition (which still is true), more the common usage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, PRESLEY said:

Just shows how this lot are always shiftin the goal post.  Edward had to abdicate over divorcee Mrs Simpson but big ears is next in line after marrying Camilla a divorcee. :suspect: Just think if Mrs Simpson had been Queen,  Bart would have been next in line. :hihi:

 This all of a sudden popular again.:D

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, PRESLEY said:

Just shows how this lot are always shiftin the goal post.  Edward had to abdicate over divorcee Mrs Simpson but big ears is next in line after marrying Camilla a divorcee. :suspect: Just think if Mrs Simpson had been Queen,  Bart would have been next in line. :hihi:

Just for the record; Wallis Simpson was TWICE divorced before she married Edward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the divorcee issue was used as a smokescreen for the fact that Edward was a nazi sympathiser and was seen as danger to the country in a time of tension between Germany and Britain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sweetcheeks said:

I believe the divorcee issue was used as a smokescreen for the fact that Edward was a nazi sympathiser and was seen as danger to the country in a time of tension between Germany and Britain.

Exactly right Sweetcheeks and Edward didn't live in the UK for long after and I think he moved from Paris to 'warmer and friendlier' climates' during WW2. As for Wallis, she probably couldn't care less as she had married -the then- world's richest man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ontarian1981 said:

 This all of a sudden popular again.:D

 

Good call.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, St Petre said:

Just for the record; Wallis Simpson was TWICE divorced before she married Edward.

Just for the record that makes her a Divorcee.  Doesn't matter if she had been divorced TWENTY times. :suspect:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, PRESLEY said:

Just for the record that makes her a Divorcee.  Doesn't matter if she had been divorced TWENTY times. :suspect:

Oh I think it would matter if she had been divorced TWENTY times, I think it would matter a lot, It would suggest something drastically  wrong with this person if she still couldn't  hold on to a husband after 20 attempts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, jaffa1 said:

Oh I think it would matter if she had been divorced TWENTY times, I think it would matter a lot, It would suggest something drastically  wrong with this person if she still couldn't  hold on to a husband after 20 attempts. 

Not on about if it matters.   I was stateing a fact, as far as the church involvement with the royals over a  divorcee situation is, once divorced is enough.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 22/11/2019 at 23:37, Longcol said:

A photo of people with arms around each others waists hardly qualifies as "child grooming" - and Guiffre hardly qualifies as a "child" in that picture - could be anything fron late teens to nigh on 30 in that photo.

 

What's wrong with describing him as an alleged sexual predator or even rapist? "Pedo" usually belongs on stupid conspiracy theory forums like David Icke - let's not lower SF to that level.

No but what  Guiffre and other victims coming forward describe is most definitely child grooming and sex trafficking. 

 

And as for the David Icke references, maybe he wasn't far from off the mark after all.  Have you ever seen a lizard sweat? 😳

 

By the way, if you think that young girl in the photo could be nearly thirty, I hope the police never have to rely on you for a description!

Edited by Lex Luthor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.