Pettytom   1 #97 Posted September 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, staninoodle said: Not according to at least 2 english newspapers its far from safe,its quite the opposite. But its amusing watching the bile flow out of the usual suspects on here 🤣 No bile from me, just straightforward facts.  Boycott is a convicted woman beater. He’s a violent criminal and should not be knighted.  Why do you think that violent, convicted criminals should get honours?   Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Longcol   567 #98 Posted September 19, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, staninoodle said: He was hardly a boxer either,lets face it he was never a prime fit looking sportsman,he was just some plodder that ran 22 yards!!! Didn't need to be a boxer nor a fit sportsman - just an average bloke in his mid 50's swinging a few punches. Edited September 19, 2019 by Longcol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Padders   2,668 #99 Posted September 19, 2019 13 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said: No he wouldn’t, but in this case the conviction was safe.  Get over it! He is a knight of the realm , Sir Geoff Boycott.. Get over it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
staninoodle   168 #100 Posted September 19, 2019 The account in the mail casts many doubts https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7449719/What-truth-Geoffrey-Boycott-lover-black-eyes.html/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/18/new-evidence-casts-doubt-sir-geoffrey-boycotts-assault-case/ https://heraldpublicist.com/new-evidence-casts-doubt-on-sir-geoffrey-boycotts-assault-case-friends-claim/ Casts plenty of doubt go and gorge boys 😊 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Top Cats Hat   10 #101 Posted September 19, 2019 Just now, staninoodle said: The account in the mail casts many doubts The Mail and the Telegraph! 😂🤣😂 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Longcol   567 #102 Posted September 19, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, staninoodle said: The account in the mail casts many doubts https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7449719/What-truth-Geoffrey-Boycott-lover-black-eyes.html/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/18/new-evidence-casts-doubt-sir-geoffrey-boycotts-assault-case/ https://heraldpublicist.com/new-evidence-casts-doubt-on-sir-geoffrey-boycotts-assault-case-friends-claim/ Casts plenty of doubt go and gorge boys 😊 Strange that Boycott wasn't denying she had bruising to her face and said that it was the result of a fall. Edited September 19, 2019 by Longcol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
staninoodle   168 #103 Posted September 19, 2019 6 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said: The Mail and the Telegraph! 😂🤣😂 Awww dont tell me....theyve be found guilty of violent conduct too,in a french court by any chance? So there opinions dont count 🙄 1 minute ago, Longcol said: Strange that Boycott wasn't denying she had bruising to her face and that it was the result of a fall. Your fixated,look at the bigger picture,drink it in,and digest for a while Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Longcol   567 #104 Posted September 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, staninoodle said:  Your fixated,look at the bigger picture,drink it in,and digest for a while Look at the pictures of her bruising (which Boycott has never denied as far as I'm aware) and tell me how you get them as the result of a fall.  And her supposedly reporting to an unnamed friend in an unattributable quote that the injuries were due to a fall - one of journalisms oldest tricks.   Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #105 Posted September 19, 2019 Wow. All these apologists for a woman beater. Extraordinary - and here's me thinking it was 2019, and that not all men were knobheads.  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
staninoodle   168 #106 Posted September 20, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Halibut said: Wow. All these apologists for a woman beater. Extraordinary - and here's me thinking it was 2019, and that not all men were knobheads.  Wow I thought wed stopped burning witches wayback in 1682,but in 2019 the knobheads are still here,still burning,well four of em,you never dissapoint god bless sheff forum and the 4 amigos.........enjoy your anger fellas never let it go 😂 Edited September 20, 2019 by staninoodle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
mancmart   10 #107 Posted September 20, 2019 He appealed his conviction. The decision was upheld. She said it wasn't the first time. Why would she lie? He beats women, gets convicted. Why does it matter what country it was in, or what language they speak, he beats women? What is a knight of the 'realm' Honours bestowed by useless politicians. He ain't 'sir' to me. Just a sad, violent bully who hits women and gets found guilty. Make that five amigos!  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Top Cats Hat   10 #108 Posted September 20, 2019 10 hours ago, staninoodle said: So there opinions dont count 🙄  You said it. Opinions!  Both the Mail and the Telegraph are both right-wing newspapers with a long history of racism, xenophobia and misogyny. The fact that they champion a racist and misogynist convicted in a ‘foreign’ court like Boycott, says much more about the political position of those papers than his guilt or innocence.  As you said, simply opinion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...