staninoodle   175 #85 Posted September 19, 2019 1 hour ago, Longcol said: Did Boycott dispute the photographs of these injuries at the trial?  I thought he just said they were caused by a fall (which, looking at the photographs, seems well nigh impossible). He didnt need to dispute the pictures,he said it was all a pack of lies and spent his life denying it. It would take a pretty skilled knuckle artist to not hit the nose surely,some ageing ex batsmen,wouldnt surely be skillfull enough to hit the face so precisely,considering there was also a struggle at the time. Moore was also reported to police for an attack on a male 1998 on the french riviera,just weeks after the trial,the capt and a crew member described her as a"Raging pitbull" 1 hour ago, Pettytom said: One conviction.  For a violent crime.  Therefore, a violent criminal He wouldnt be the first victim of a a miscariage of justice would he? It happens Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Pettytom   1 #86 Posted September 19, 2019 9 minutes ago, staninoodle said: He didnt need to dispute the pictures,he said it was all a pack of lies and spent his life denying it. It would take a pretty skilled knuckle artist to not hit the nose surely,some ageing ex batsmen,wouldnt surely be skillfull enough to hit the face so precisely,considering there was also a struggle at the time. Moore was also reported to police for an attack on a male 1998 on the french riviera,just weeks after the trial,the capt and a crew member described her as a"Raging pitbull" He wouldnt be the first victim of a a miscariage of justice would he? It happens He’s a convicted criminal.  Therefore he shouldn’t be knighted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Padders   2,866 #87 Posted September 19, 2019 Just now, Pettytom said: He’s a convicted criminal.  Therefore he shouldn’t be knighted. Glad to see you"ve dropped the word Violent from your post Tom. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Pettytom   1 #88 Posted September 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, Padders said: Glad to see you"ve dropped the word Violent from your post Tom. He’s violent too  I just don’t like to be repetitive 😀 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
staninoodle   175 #89 Posted September 19, 2019 6 minutes ago, Pettytom said: He’s a convicted criminal.  Therefore he shouldn’t be knighted. Well seems the establishment dont think hes guilty either,otherwise he wouldnt have got knighted Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Pettytom   1 #90 Posted September 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, staninoodle said: Well seems the establishment dont think hes guilty either,otherwise he wouldnt have got knighted Then the establishment are stupid.  He’s a convicted, violent domestic abuser.  Feel free to keep on defending him, but don’t kid yourself that it is doing your reputation, or his, any good.  Did I mention, he’s guilty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
staninoodle   175 #91 Posted September 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Pettytom said: Then the establishment are stupid.  He’s a convicted, violent domestic abuser.  Feel free to keep on defending him, but don’t kid yourself that it is doing your reputation, or his, any good.  Did I mention, he’s guilty. He was found guilty,but wether that was the correct verdict is open to every individuals interpretation. Theres a bigger picture that wasnt available at the time of the conviction,which cast more than enough doubt over the verdict,and having worked in probation,I know from experience that certain judges on certain days can be absolute cretins Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Top Cats Hat   10 #92 Posted September 19, 2019 31 minutes ago, staninoodle said: He wouldnt be the first victim of a a miscariage of justice would he? It happens No he wouldn’t, but in this case the conviction was safe.  Get over it! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
staninoodle   175 #93 Posted September 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Top Cats Hat said: No he wouldn’t, but in this case the conviction was safe.  Get over it! Not according to at least 2 english newspapers its far from safe,its quite the opposite. But its amusing watching the bile flow out of the usual suspects on here 🤣 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Longcol   602 #94 Posted September 19, 2019 22 minutes ago, staninoodle said: He didnt need to dispute the pictures,he said it was all a pack of lies and spent his life denying it. It would take a pretty skilled knuckle artist to not hit the nose surely,some ageing ex batsmen,wouldnt surely be skillfull enough to hit the face so precisely,considering there was also a struggle at the time.  He didn't dispute she had injuries did he?  I'm sure he said they were the result of a fall.  It's well nigh impossible to get injuries like that from a fall - and it's hardly precise hitting - looks like somebody's swung a few lefts and rights. And as for "ageing" - come on - how old was he at the time - mid 50's - hardly some weak old bloke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Top Cats Hat   10 #95 Posted September 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, staninoodle said: Not according to at least 2 english newspapers its far from safe,its quite the opposite. But its amusing watching the bile flow out of the usual suspects on here 🤣 Which English newspapers would they be then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
staninoodle   175 #96 Posted September 19, 2019 Just now, Longcol said: He didn't dispute she had injuries did he?  I'm sure he said they were the result of a fall.  It's well nigh impossible to get injuries like that from a fall - and it's hardly precise hitting - looks like somebody's swung a few lefts and rights. And as for "ageing" - come on - how old was he at the time - mid 50's - hardly some weak old bloke. He was hardly a boxer either,lets face it he was never a prime fit looking sportsman,he was just some plodder that ran 22 yards!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...