Jump to content

Consequences Of Brexit [Part 8] Read First Post Before Posting

Vaati

Mod Note: As we are getting rather tired of seeing reports about this. The use of the word Remoaners  is to cease. Either posts like adults, or don't post at all. The mod warnings have been clear.

Message added by Vaati

mort

In addition to remoaner we are also not going to allow the use of libdums or liebore - if you cannot behave like adults and post without recourse to these childish insults then please refrain from posting. If you have a problem with this then you all know where the helpdesk is. 

Message added by mort

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Car Boot said:

Most of our pro-EU Remainer politicians desire an EU army to be the military might of an EU Empire.

 

Better Off OUT.

If we had an EU army, we wouldn’t have participated in an illegal war in Iraq. If there was an EU army, the conflict in the Balkans would have been resolved far quicker. 
 

Remainers are not going to apologise for wanting to create military force to ensure our freedoms and peace is preserved. Why would we really want an independent army anyway? Seriously, under what circumstances would we be better off to act unilaterally in an armed conflict?

 

The nuclear deterrent could be pooled with the French to form the ultimate guarantee against aggressors. Hell, if that happened, we would save billions for not needing to build and maintain such a system on our own. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Albert the Cat said:

If we had an EU army, we wouldn’t have participated in an illegal war in Iraq. If there was an EU army, the conflict in the Balkans would have been resolved far quicker. 
 

Remainers are not going to apologise for wanting to create military force to ensure our freedoms and peace is preserved. Why would we really want an independent army anyway? Seriously, under what circumstances would we be better off to act unilaterally in an armed conflict?

 

The nuclear deterrent could be pooled with the French to form the ultimate guarantee against aggressors. Hell, if that happened, we would save billions for not needing to build and maintain such a system on our own. 

If we had an EU army, the EU Empire would be losing a war against the military might of Putin's Russia...

Edited by Car Boot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Car Boot said:

If we had an EU army, the EU Empire would be losing a war against the military might of Putin's Russia...

And we could win it on our own?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Albert the Cat said:

And we could win it on our own?

We aren't reckless or stupid enough to take on the second most powerful military force in the world.

 

The EU Empire certainly is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Car Boot said:

We aren't reckless or stupid enough to take on the second most powerful military force in the world.

 

The EU Empire certainly is.

You’re amusing today.

 

Are you really claiming that an organisation that is instrumental in ensuring the longest period of peace in Europe, would start a war with Russia?

 

Seriously?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Albert the Cat said:

And we could win it on our own?

The UK are a member of NATO.  We haven't had a third World War mainly because of NATO and not the EU.  NATO ended the Balkans War not EU diplomacy  An EU army wouldn't be better than NATO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Lockdoctor said:

The UK are a member of NATO.  We haven't had a third World War mainly because of NATO and not the EU.  NATO ended the Balkans War not EU diplomacy  An EU army wouldn't be better than NATO.

Do you think the EU army would start more or less conflicts than a US led NATO?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, tinfoilhat said:

Do you think the EU army would start more or less conflicts than a US led NATO?

Depends who is in charge at the White House. Mistakes have been made in the past.  I think a US led NATO will be better to end conflicts than an EU army and are more likely to  deter a Third World War.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Lockdoctor said:

Depends who is in charge at the White House. Mistakes have been made in the past.  I think a US led NATO will be better to end conflicts than an EU army and are more likely to  deter a Third World War.

There are conflicts around the world,mainly as a result of disputed borders.We are fortunate that with the exception of Ireland and the factions that made up the old Yugoslavia,we have not had any major conflicts in Europe.

Ultimately these conflicts are only resolved with varying degrees of success by discussion and negotiations.

The EU has given us the forum to resolve disputes without resorting to armed conflict.

A combined European power would hopefully have a mediating influence on any future excesses involving Russia,America,and China.

To pursue the creation of new borders,both physical and economic flies in the face of history.Economic prosperity only thrives in settled countries,and Brexit is anything but constructive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Car Boot said:

We aren't reckless or stupid enough to take on the second most powerful military force in the world.

 

The EU Empire certainly is.

Again, any evidence for the state re the EU above?

 

You didn't answer the earlier request for evidence of your previous statement.

 

Shall we just assume you are making things up, purely for effect?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Albert the Cat said:

And we could win it on our own?

I suspect that Mr Car Boot would be on Putin’s side in any dispute.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bargepole23 said:

Again, any evidence for the state re the EU above?

 

You didn't answer the earlier request for evidence of your previous statement.

 

Shall we just assume you are making things up, purely for effect?

Demonising Putin when it was the West that provoked the Ukraine crisis

 

"And still scarcely reported here have been the billions of dollars and euros the West has been more or less secretively pouring into Ukraine to promote the cause: not just to prop up its bankrupt government and banking system, but to fund scores of bogus “pro-European” groups making up what the EU calls “civil society”.

 

When the European Commission told a journalist that, between 2004 and 2013, these groups had only been given €31 million, my co-author Richard North was soon reporting on his EU Referendum blog that the true figure, shown on the commission’s own “Financial Transparency” website, was €496 million."

 

http://www.stopwar.org.uk/index.php/action-a-events/national-events/1298-fri-25-may-stop-the-war-cultural-event-dont-attack-iran-performers-include-mark-rylance-and-tony-benn

 

The EU dangerously provoked the conflict in Ukraine due to its reckless and remorseless drive for expansion. Now the EU has designs on becoming an Empire possessing cutting edge weapons of mass destruction, it's propaganda war will only intensify.

Edited by Car Boot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.