Consequences Of Brexit [Part 8] Read First Post Before Posting

[Robin-H 11]

2 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

No, it’s more nuanced than that.

 

All three courts agreed that the ability to prorogue was an entirely political decision for the Prime Minister.

 

The Scottish Court of Appeal however, went further and stated that the reason for prorogation must be given to the monarch as part of the assent procedure. The court ruled that in this case, the government had hidden the real reasons for prorogation from the monarch in order to get that consent.

 

It is this misrepresentation which the court ruled made the act unlawful. We shall see if the Supreme Court agrees with them.

 We don’t, but I’m pretty sure he didn’t tell her that he had promised his party that he would be taking the UK out of the EU by October 31st, but given that he didn’t have the numbers the only way he could ensure this was to stop Parliament sitting.

 

It’s not as if he hadn’t publicly threatened to do this months previously.

That's actually not the case. The Belfast Court didn't rule on prorogation (contrary to earlier reports) as they said that was already the 'centrepiece' of the English and Scottish cases. 

 

[retep 68]

13 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

No, it’s more nuanced than that.

 

All three courts agreed that the ability to prorogue was an entirely political decision for the Prime Minister.

 

The Scottish Court of Appeal however, went further and stated that the reason for prorogation must be given to the monarch as part of the assent procedure. The court ruled that in this case, the government had hidden the real reasons for prorogation from the monarch in order to get that consent.

 

It is this misrepresentation which the court ruled made the act unlawful. We shall see if the Supreme Court agrees with them.

 We don’t, but I’m pretty sure he didn’t tell her that he had promised his party that he would be taking the UK out of the EU by October 31st, but given that he didn’t have the numbers the only way he could ensure this was to stop Parliament sitting.

 

It’s not as if he hadn’t publicly threatened to do this months previously.

What's the chances of hiding anything from the monarch and her advisers?

[Ontarian1981 10]

17 hours ago, Pettytom said:

I was in St Emilion this very morning and that’s what I did.  

 

Believe it, or not, some of us take the brunt of this Brexit nonsense, whilst trying to keep good relationships with people that we need, or respect.

 

You might need to look up the word “respect”

 

If you wish to pop round in a few weeks, I have a couple of cases  of decent red to share. That should prove where I’ve been.

That would add "Claretty" to your trip story eh? Just so we would know you didn't travel by Google Air. 😉

[Top Cats Hat 10]

15 minutes ago, Robin-H said:

That's actually not the case. The Belfast Court didn't rule on prorogation

No, but he said that the matter of prorogation should be dealt with by politicians, not the courts.

 

7 minutes ago, retep said:

What's the chances of hiding anything from the monarch and her advisers?

Practically zero, given that pretty much everyone in the Western world knows the genuine reason for the prorogation!

[Robin-H 11]

4 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

No, but he said that the matter of prorogation should be dealt with by politicians, not the courts.

 

Practically zero, given that pretty much everyone in the Western world knows the genuine reason for the prorogation!

Where did he say that? 

 

[ANGELFIRE1 10]

Brexiteers  Farage and Boris agree that air will still be available, and free to breathe after October the 31st.

 

Remoaners categorically state,  that info is in fact incorrect, there will be no air to breathe after we crash out, fall off the cliff edge and and a dozen more catastrophic scenarios of leaving the EU. But add, if by some chance there is air, it will be charged for, plus vat of course, another consequence of leaving the EU.  It's getting really scary now. 🤣🤣🤣

 

Angel1.

[geared 305]

2 hours ago, Penistone999 said:

We are all up for cheaper booze .

It would seem as though in fact we are not.  Just another Brexit lie.

[Top Cats Hat 10]

1 hour ago, Robin-H said:

Where did he say that? 

 

At Belfast’s High Court in Chichester Street.

[Robin-H 11]

29 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

At Belfast’s High Court in Chichester Street.

Very clever.../s

 

Where in the decision? What paragraph? 

 

If if helps, the judgement can be read here. 

 

https://judiciaryni.uk/sites/judiciary/files/decisions/McCord (Raymond)%2C JR83 and Jamie Waring's Applications v the Prime Minister and others.pdf

 

I can't find the bit where he says prorogation should be dealt with by politicians and not the courts but I may have missed it. Which bit is it? 

Edited September 12, 2019 by Robin-H

[retep 68]

1 hour ago, Top Cats Hat said:

No, but he said that the matter of prorogation should be dealt with by politicians, not the courts.

 

Practically zero, given that pretty much everyone in the Western world knows the genuine reason for the prorogation!

Then we can assume she wasn't  deceived.

[Hadron 10]

The way Nigel F was talking yesterday, I think he fancies his chances as Deputy Prime Minister if there is an election.

Edited September 12, 2019 by Hadron

[melthebell 863]

anybody want to talk about this guy?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crispin_Odey

 

another brextremist "traitor" betting against the pound...and in the process the country, trying to make a pretty penny for him and his company at our expense