Why do RAF Jets escort plane's?

[melthebell 862]

47 minutes ago, Annie Bynnol said:

Watching a professional Conspiracy Theorist interviewed on Iranian TV by a professional Conspiracy Theorist is not research.

 

 

it is if you're a conspiracy theorist lol

[crookesjoe 10]

On 09/07/2019 at 02:02, Obelix said:

You know that looks just like a bulldung Youtube video to me. I'm not wading through all that - tell us what your evidence is.

 

So I provided evidence, and you refused to even watch it. Seems a bit silly.

 

If you won't watch the evidence I provided, I'm not really sure if it's possible to debate with you.

 

I'll try one more time.....

 

There is a movement called 'Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth'

 

It's membership includes 3000+ qualified Engineers and Architects that question the official explanation of what happened that day.

 

I have provided a video and cited my sources.

You won't even watch the video, that's a pretty blinkered outlook. 

[crookesjoe 10]

On 09/07/2019 at 08:02, Annie Bynnol said:

Watching a professional Conspiracy Theorist interviewed on Iranian TV by a professional Conspiracy Theorist is not 

What? 

 

So 3000+ qualified architects and engineers should just be discounted as 'conspiracy theorists'

 

And whom are the 'professional conspiracy theorists' you are referring to?

 

I just see an expert offering up an alternative opinion. 

 

 

[Halibut 12]

1 hour ago, crookesjoe said:

 

 

And whom are the 'professional conspiracy theorists' you are referring to?

 

 

People who make a living by peddling nonsense theories.

[crookesjoe 10]

44 minutes ago, Halibut said:

People who make a living by peddling nonsense theories.

3000+ degree holding experts in architecture and engineering.

 

It's your right to live in an echo chamber if you so desire. However, I think you're extremely arrogant to just immediately dismiss the evidence and opinion of 3000+ experts on the subject.

 

Would you care to discuss the finer points made by the numerous  structural engineers that call into question the official account?

 

Or would you just prefer to shout 'conspiracy theory' without any following grown up conversation?

[Halibut 12]

1 minute ago, crookesjoe said:

3000+ degree holding experts in architecture and engineering.

 

It's your right to live in an echo chamber if you so desire. However, I think you're extremely arrogant to just immediately dismiss the evidence and opinion of 3000+ experts on the subject.

 

Would you care to discuss the finer points made by the numerous  structural engineers that call into question the official account?

 

Or would you just prefer to shout 'conspiracy theory' without any following grown up conversation?

Zero evidence of a controlled explosion. Zero testimony of anyone who rigged the explosives. Yawn.

[crookesjoe 10]

54 minutes ago, Halibut said:

People who make a living by peddling nonsense theories.

The US government plotted to commit huge terrorist style attacks on it's own people back in 1962.

 

I'm sure Halibut would call that a crackpot 'nonsense theory'.

Just now, Halibut said:

Zero evidence of a controlled explosion. Zero testimony of anyone who rigged the explosives. Yawn.

Masses of evidence in the video I previously linked.

[Halibut 12]

9/11 happened because some bad guys flew planes into buildings.

[crookesjoe 10]

3 minutes ago, Halibut said:

9/11 happened because some bad guys flew planes into buildings.

You're an intelligent person clearly, it's a real shame you'd degrade yourself like this.

[Halibut 12]

2 minutes ago, crookesjoe said:

You're an intelligent person clearly, it's a real shame you'd degrade yourself like this.

😄

[Top Cats Hat 10]

3 hours ago, crookesjoe said:

You won't even watch the video, that's a pretty blinkered outlook. 

Not really.

 

There are tens of billions of videos on youtube. You can’t possibly watch all of them so you have to pick and choose. In 2019 it is pretty easy to determine what is worth watching and what is just bonkers, evidence free  conspiraloon rubbish.

 

It is not at all blinkered to make an informed choice on where you get your information.

[crookesjoe 10]

11 minutes ago, Top Cats Hat said:

Not really.

 

There are tens of billions of videos on youtube. You can’t possibly watch all of them so you have to pick and choose. In 2019 it is pretty easy to determine what is worth watching and what is just bonkers, evidence free  conspiraloon rubbish.

 

It is not at all blinkered to make an informed choice on where you get your information.

Couldn't agree more with that.