BBC Bias - "Accidental" Gaffes

[WiseOwl182 10]

So I see the BBC have been caught red handed again, after the shambles of a debate the other day:

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/06/19/bbc-facing-questions-anti-semitic-imam-grilled-tory-leadership/

 

Accusations of poor vetting, along with Emily Maitlis targeting Boris Johnson with follow up questions 23 times; 10 occasions more than anyone else.

[DT Ralge 10]

You could argue that Boris was given more than ample opportunity to give his colourful, error- and gaffe-strewn past a light (his words) “sand-papering”.

The things is, though, his past reveals far more deep-seated flaws so the sand-papering will achieve nothing in my mind at least,  

The two-faced, “sophisticated” band of MP’s who have said off-the-record “anyone but Boris” (and melted away) are spineless in their self-interest. 

And then you have the  unrepresentative 160,000 who will still vote for him, it seems - interesting times.

 

Trump with his 3-hour spray and quiff and Bozo’s “never been near a comb/brush” since the bullies at school kept stealing them.

... and, not forgetting, clever manipulation of alternative facts on both sides of the Pond. 

 

Then, it takes the Tories a month to choose between two candidates at the same time that someone expects to renegotiate the EU deal in just three months. 

Go figure and take a reality check. 

[nikki-red 308]

Back on topic please (the BBC?)