Climate change protests

[FinBak 12]

2 minutes ago, melthebell said:

nah theyd be superglued to yer desk. LOL

I'm not that strict Mel...Only on Friday afternoons.

[horribleblob 212]

5 minutes ago, FinBak said:

Why were they not at work? ........If they were in MY Employ they would be fired on the spot.

Even I can think of at least four reasons why they might not have been at work at that particular time of day – and none of those reasons involve unemployment benefits. If you are indeed an employer yourself, I'm sure you can probably beat my four reasons if you really thought about it.

[FinBak 12]

Just now, horribleblob said:

Even I can think of at least four reasons why they might not have been at work at that particular time of day – and none of those reasons involve unemployment benefits. If you are indeed an employer yourself, I'm sure you can probably beat my four reasons if you really thought about it.

I don't need 4 reasons. Just ONE.!

[horribleblob 212]

8 minutes ago, FinBak said:

I don't need 4 reasons. Just ONE.!

Ok. Just one. They are self-employed.

[FinBak 12]

My apologies. My reply was to do with If I had just ONE reason to Fire someone.!

 

[horribleblob 212]

Yes, we were at cross purposes. I meant, I could think of four reasons why someone [not employed by you] would not be at work at that time.

 

I can't help it FinBak, but I now think of you as some kind of Scrooge-type employer. My apologies too. I'll try and shake that image from my head.

[Mister Gee 812]

17 minutes ago, FinBak said:

My apologies. My reply was to do with If I had just ONE reason to Fire someone.!

 

Thank goodness you'll never be in a position to fire anyone.

[FinBak 12]

5 minutes ago, horribleblob said:

Yes, we were at cross purposes. I meant, I could think of four reasons why someone [not employed by you] would not be at work at that time.

 

I can't help it FinBak, but I now think of you as some kind of Scrooge-type employer. My apologies too. I'll try and shake that image from my head.

Your small print..!   Well,  if you can make an opinion of ME as scathing as that... that's how much you can trust what is said On-Line.

 

I would rather cross your palm with Gold the sooner than take it away from you.

 

It's sad that folks get the wrong impression.  That's life. 

5 minutes ago, Mister Gee said:

Thank goodness you'll never be in a position to fire anyone.

Likewise..Thank goodness YOU won't be one of my employees.!

[Mister Gee 812]

5 minutes ago, FinBak said:

Your small print..!   Well,  if you can make an opinion of ME as scathing as that... that's how much you can trust what is said On-Line.

 

I would rather cross your palm with Gold the sooner than take it away from you.

 

It's sad that folks get the wrong impression.  That's life. 

Likewise..Thank goodness YOU won't be one of my employees.!

You're clearly as thick as two short planks and will never be in a position to employ anyone. 

[horribleblob 212]

7 minutes ago, FinBak said:

Your small print..! ..

It's sad that folks get the wrong impression.  That's life.

It is. I knew I should have employed some jovial emoticons to show the lightness of my subscript, but I prefer not to use them. Hey ho. As you say 'That's life'.

[tinfoilhat 11]

5 minutes ago, Mister Gee said:

You're clearly as thick as two short planks and will never be in a position to employ anyone. 

Of course he can, he was buying houses with bars of gold the other day.

[FinBak 12]

7 minutes ago, horribleblob said:

It is. I knew I should have employed some jovial emoticons to show the lightness of my subscript, but I prefer not to use them. Hey ho. As you say 'That's life'.

Agreed. i prefer not to use emoticons also. 

 

6 minutes ago, tinfoilhat said:

Of course he can, he was buying houses with bars of gold the other day.

Not quite like that...But on the right track...

Edited April 17, 2019 by FinBak