Shamima Begum

[Halibut 12]

3 minutes ago, danot said:

She voluntarily joined the death cult to marry one of the killers, living alongside his accomplices who were  murdering  innocent aid workers.  

No doubt she'll be suffering from Rosemary West syndrome?

I think you probably need to direct your ire at a more worthy target. Try the president of the USA, who is a far greater threat than Shamina Begum will ever be.

[danot 10]

1 minute ago, Halibut said:

I think you probably need to direct your ire at a more worthy target. Try the president of the USA, who is a far greater threat than Shamina Begum will ever be.

Why is he a threat? Is it because he intentionally angers savages?

[Phanerothyme 12]

She's a UK citizen. She can't be refused entry. UK is under no obligation to repatriate her FOC, but she will understandably be the subject of intense media and LEO scrutiny if she manages to find her way back.

1 minute ago, danot said:

Why is he a threat? Is it because he intentionally angers savages?

It's angering savages with the intention of winning their vote,that's so unappealing about Trump.

[danot 10]

3 minutes ago, Phanerothyme said:

She's a UK citizen. She can't be refused entry. UK is under no obligation to repatriate her FOC, but she will understandably be the subject of intense media and LEO scrutiny if she manages to find her way back.

It's angering savages with the intention of winning their vote,that's so unappealing about Trump.

And who might the savages be in your scenario?

[despritdan 241]

I wouldn't want her back but as she's a British citizen, we'd have no choice but to let her back in if she can get to a country with a British consulate. It's doubtful that she'd be prosecuted because there's no proof that she was anything but the housewife and mother she claims to have been. The question we should be asking isn't: should she be allowed to come back? but however did it get to this? If it was possible to go back in time and tell the British people in the 50s, 60s and 70s that in a few decades, we'd be debating whether or not a pregnant British Muslim teenager who's already had 2 children and who went to Syria to join a sadistic, barbaric terrorist group, should be allowed to come back to Britain to have her baby on the NHS, they'd say you were mad and we must be to have let this country sink so low.

I've always felt the Islamic world should be held at arm's length. The 2 biggest mistakes western countries have made over the last few decades were to interfere in the internal affairs of Islamic countries and to let people from those countries into the west. I know that the majority of Muslims are decent people but Islam is the soil which holds the seeds of extremism and there are plenty of people willing to water and nurture those seeds. An American journalist from The New York Times who specialises in this sort of extremism said on the radio that the European jihadis returning to their own countries have been briefed by ISIS on what to say when they return, then use social media to

co-ordinate a war in Europe. It's a cancer which is destroying our civilised societies and will only get worse thanks to politicians in denial and naïve citizens.

[leviathan13 348]

42 minutes ago, Halibut said:

And let's not forget, as far as we know she hasn't killed anybody.

So? She supports a regime who do kill and murder!

 

To the left and SJWs, white men are evil because of inequality... this scum supports and promotes the murder/torture/destruction of anyone different to them and somehow they're a bit misunderstood!

[Halibut 12]

4 minutes ago, leviathan13 said:

So? She supports a regime who do kill and murder!

 

To the left and SJWs, white men are evil because of inequality... this scum supports and promotes the murder/torture/destruction of anyone different to them and somehow they're a bit misunderstood!

I don't know about that, but they've killed many, many more than ISIS ever did.

[Albert smith 11]

7 minutes ago, despritdan said:

I wouldn't want her back but as she's a British citizen, we'd have no choice but to let her back in if she can get to a country with a British consulate. It's doubtful that she'd be prosecuted because there's no proof that she was anything but the housewife and mother she claims to have been. The question we should be asking isn't: should she be allowed to come back? but however did it get to this? If it was possible to go back in time and tell the British people in the 50s, 60s and 70s that in a few decades, we'd be debating whether or not a pregnant British Muslim teenager who's already had 2 children and who went to Syria to join a sadistic, barbaric terrorist group, should be allowed to come back to Britain to have her baby on the NHS, they'd say you were mad and we must be to have let this country sink so low.

I've always felt the Islamic world should be held at arm's length. The 2 biggest mistakes western countries have made over the last few decades were to interfere in the internal affairs of Islamic countries and to let people from those countries into the west. I know that the majority of Muslims are decent people but Islam is the soil which holds the seeds of extremism and there are plenty of people willing to water and nurture those seeds. An American journalist from The New York Times who specialises in this sort of extremism said on the radio that the European jihadis returning to their own countries have been briefed by ISIS on what to say when they return, then use social media to

co-ordinate a war in Europe. It's a cancer which is destroying our civilised societies and will only get worse thanks to politicians in denial and naïve citizens.

And that is the problem the people who should have stopped the march of Islam into Northern Europe actually encouraged  it .

We are now reaping the consequences  .

[tinfoilhat 11]

2 minutes ago, Albert smith said:

And that is the problem the people who should have stopped the march of Islam into Northern Europe actually encouraged  it .

We are now reaping the consequences  .

What a load of old codswollop. Sorry uncle Albert but thats stone age thinking.

 

Muslims aren’t  out to get you. 

[WiseOwl182 10]

7 minutes ago, Halibut said:

I don't know about that, but they've killed many, many more than ISIS ever did.

In the history of humanity? Obviously an unfair comparison.

[Halibut 12]

13 minutes ago, despritdan said:

I know that the majority of Muslims are decent people but Islam is the soil which holds the seeds of extremism and there are plenty of people willing to water and nurture those seeds.

If that's true, how do you account for other forms of non - Islamic extremism?

[Crosser 10]

2 minutes ago, Halibut said:

If that's true, how do you account for other forms of non - Islamic extremism?

Good point....

 

Afterall it's not so long ago that Belfast was the Beirut of the British Isles...