Hotmale 1954 201 #1 Posted February 5, 2019 (edited) I've just watched an interview with Steve Bruce at the Ipswich ground and I noticed how few sponsors were on show on the backboards. I then watched another one held at Hillsborough and it struck me how little income we also get from Companies. I think there were 3 ads on display, D TAXIS (who?) Elev8 (who?) and Chansiri. I would imagine that sponsors pay pretty good dosh to be seen worldwide at Football Stadia and other sports grounds. I know that the Championship has the second biggest attendances in Europe (maybe the world?) and I assume that Championship games are viewed quite regularly around Europe. On that basis, why are our boards at S6 almost devoid of outside advertising? Like match fees, shirts and such, are Chansiri's fees for adverts restricting sponsorship and advertising? Wouldn't a re-think be in order and ad revenue improved to make day to day running a bit more manageable? Surely, it's got to be easier and more lucrative than the present 1867 initiative? Both plans would give us very welcome revenue, so why haven't we got much take up on it? Just a thought. Edited February 5, 2019 by Hotmale 1954 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ALAN 58 10 #2 Posted February 5, 2019 56 minutes ago, Hotmale 1954 said: I've just watched an interview with Steve Bruce at the Ipswich ground and I noticed how few sponsors were on show on the backboards. I then watched another one held at Hillsborough and it struck me how little income we also get from Companies. I think there were 3 ads on display, D TAXIS (who?) Elev8 (who?) and Chansiri. I would imagine that sponsors pay pretty good dosh to be seen worldwide at Football Stadia and other sports grounds. I know that the Championship has the second biggest attendances in Europe (maybe the world?) and I assume that Championship games are viewed quite regularly around Europe. On that basis, why are our boards at S6 almost devoid of outside advertising? Like match fees, shirts and such, are Chansiri's fees for adverts restricting sponsorship and advertising? Wouldn't a re-think be in order and ad revenue improved to make day to day running a bit more manageable? Surely, it's got to be easier and more lucrative than the present 1867 initiative? Both plans would give us very welcome revenue, so why haven't we got much take up on it? Just a thought. We also hear of how PL clubs would survive without crowd receipts. There is obviously big money in advertising, ground naming and sponsorship thats for sure. Time for DC to take a look at his marketing strategy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
bassett one 447 #3 Posted February 5, 2019 all our 3 advertiser dont really exist the taxi company is a paper company,but doesnt have taxis as yet the elev 11 is the company that sponsor&make our shirts chansiri is the owners company but i agree although the above are legal they are not the same as the big sports companys,but swfc dont have for whatever a big sports company making there shirts ect we need big companys like other football clubs,ours are very odd Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
abbeyedges 82 #4 Posted February 5, 2019 2 hours ago, bassett one said: all our 3 advertiser dont really exist the taxi company is a paper company,but doesnt have taxis as yet the elev 11 is the company that sponsor&make our shirts chansiri is the owners company but i agree although the above are legal they are not the same as the big sports companys,but swfc dont have for whatever a big sports company making there shirts ect we need big companys like other football clubs,ours are very odd Are you sure its legal Bassett? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Albert smith 11 #5 Posted February 5, 2019 As long as they do not have money lenders or betting companies they can advertise owt they want for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jim Hardie 517 #6 Posted February 5, 2019 1 hour ago, abbeyedges said: Are you sure its legal Bassett? If you have any information, pass it on to the police. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
atticus 95 #7 Posted February 5, 2019 So D Taxis don't actually exist as a taxi company; how's that work then? I was at Hillsborough a few months ago and their name was all over the advertising boards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Brooker11 10 #8 Posted February 5, 2019 The chairman puts more money into the club than any other sponsors would, Hillsborough has a tarnished name and will not attract blue chip companies, the money we could get in would be minimal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
prince al 167 #9 Posted February 6, 2019 I think that it’s quite a bit of money, but not enough to run the club. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Hotmale 1954 201 #10 Posted February 7, 2019 (edited) On 05/02/2019 at 15:19, bassett one said: all our 3 advertiser dont really exist the taxi company is a paper company,but doesnt have taxis as yet the elev 11 is the company that sponsor&make our shirts chansiri is the owners company but i agree although the above are legal they are not the same as the big sports companys,but swfc dont have for whatever a big sports company making there shirts ect we need big companys like other football clubs,ours are very odd What's Elev 11? I must have missed it. Elev 8 is supposed to be an energy drink isn't it? A 'Taxi firm' with no telephone number or App will soon go out of business. Edited February 7, 2019 by Hotmale 1954 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
woodview 10 #11 Posted February 7, 2019 47 minutes ago, Hotmale 1954 said: What's Elev 11? I must have missed it. Elev 8 is supposed to be an energy drink isn't it? A 'Taxi firm' with no telephone number or App will soon go out of business. It's a 'scam' for chansiri to put money in to the club, without breaking ffp rules. Instead of giving money, he sets up a taxi company with no cars and buys advertising with the club. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jim Hardie 517 #12 Posted February 7, 2019 7 hours ago, woodview said: It's a 'scam' for chansiri to put money in to the club, without breaking ffp rules. Instead of giving money, he sets up a taxi company with no cars and buys advertising with the club. If it's not breaking any rules, it must be open to every club. Who's being scammed? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...