Jump to content

Prince Phils driving exploits.

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Albert smith said:

Perhaps its a push before a shove .

Has he been caught having to push his broken down car? Poor fella, they must have hit hard times! 😀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Top Cats Hat said:

I sniff a deal to avoid prosecution! 😡

I don't see the problem.  Mind you, i cant see anyone at the CPS being stupid enough to prosecute , wouldnt be a good career move. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Penistone999 said:

I don't see the problem.  Mind you, i cant see anyone at the CPS being stupid enough to prosecute , wouldnt be a good career move. 

I agree, it would not surprise me either if a deal was done. But the law should be applied equally to all. from Prince to Pauper. Yes.

 

Angel1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Chris Grayling is going to be his new driver, he's going to want his licence back ASAP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Penistone999 said:

I don't see the problem.  Mind you, i cant see anyone at the CPS being stupid enough to prosecute , wouldnt be a good career move. 

Because they never dared prosecute Princess Anne under the Dangerous Dogs act did they...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Obelix said:

Because they never dared prosecute Princess Anne under the Dangerous Dogs act did they...?

Hmmm... :huh:


... that's a bit rude! :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Obelix said:

Because they never dared prosecute Princess Anne under the Dangerous Dogs act did they...?

She was prosecuted, wasn't she?
 

Quote

Princess Anne was convicted under the Dangerous Dogs Act last year after the same dog attacked two children.

Anne was fined £500 and ordered to pay £500 compensation to the children and £148 in court costs

 

Ironically went on to kill one of the Queen's Corgis!

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3345585.stm

Edited by alchresearch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.. that was the point....

 

Someone claimed that the DoE was untouchable as a member of the Royals, ignoring the fact that the Princess Royal was prosecuted for the fairly minor crime of an out of control dog...

1 hour ago, Mr Bloke said:

Hmmm... :huh:


... that's a bit rude! :o

Oh very good :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.