Albert smith   11 #109 Posted February 9, 2019 Perhaps its a push before a shove . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
woodview   10 #110 Posted February 10, 2019 15 hours ago, Albert smith said: Perhaps its a push before a shove . Has he been caught having to push his broken down car? Poor fella, they must have hit hard times! 😀 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Top Cats Hat   10 #111 Posted February 10, 2019 I sniff a deal to avoid prosecution! 😡 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Penistone999   10 #112 Posted February 10, 2019 7 hours ago, Top Cats Hat said: I sniff a deal to avoid prosecution! 😡 I don't see the problem. Mind you, i cant see anyone at the CPS being stupid enough to prosecute , wouldnt be a good career move. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ANGELFIRE1   10 #113 Posted February 10, 2019 16 minutes ago, Penistone999 said: I don't see the problem. Mind you, i cant see anyone at the CPS being stupid enough to prosecute , wouldnt be a good career move. I agree, it would not surprise me either if a deal was done. But the law should be applied equally to all. from Prince to Pauper. Yes.  Angel1. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Hopman   46 #114 Posted February 10, 2019 If Chris Grayling is going to be his new driver, he's going to want his licence back ASAP. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Obelix   11 #115 Posted February 11, 2019 15 hours ago, Penistone999 said: I don't see the problem. Mind you, i cant see anyone at the CPS being stupid enough to prosecute , wouldnt be a good career move. Because they never dared prosecute Princess Anne under the Dangerous Dogs act did they...? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mr Bloke   1,445 #116 Posted February 11, 2019 3 minutes ago, Obelix said: Because they never dared prosecute Princess Anne under the Dangerous Dogs act did they...? Hmmm... ... that's a bit rude! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
alchresearch   214 #117 Posted February 11, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Obelix said: Because they never dared prosecute Princess Anne under the Dangerous Dogs act did they...? She was prosecuted, wasn't she?  Quote Princess Anne was convicted under the Dangerous Dogs Act last year after the same dog attacked two children. Anne was fined £500 and ordered to pay £500 compensation to the children and £148 in court costs  Ironically went on to kill one of the Queen's Corgis!  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3345585.stm Edited February 11, 2019 by alchresearch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Obelix   11 #118 Posted February 11, 2019 Yes.. that was the point....  Someone claimed that the DoE was untouchable as a member of the Royals, ignoring the fact that the Princess Royal was prosecuted for the fairly minor crime of an out of control dog... 1 hour ago, Mr Bloke said: Hmmm... ... that's a bit rude! Oh very good Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
RiffRaff   10 #119 Posted February 11, 2019 2 hours ago, alchresearch said: She was prosecuted, wasn't she?   Ironically went on to kill one of the Queen's Corgis!  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3345585.stm Who? Princess Anne or .....? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Jim Hardie   525 #120 Posted February 14, 2019 Prince Philip will not be prosecuted over crash http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47236607 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
