Jump to content

Sheffield utd v sheffield wed

Recommended Posts

Billy Sharp ? But they've sold him about 5 times

 

Good result for Wednesday, battered in terms of possession but not really opened up other than the pen & Sharp's header.

 

And the strange fixation with the opposition budget continues

Just to add a quick post here.The owls had lost the last four games and as such a point does steady the ship.sufc controlled the game and failed to score,swfc defended and had very little going forward.Result a draw.Now mr wilder made comments regarding the owls squad ete ete which for me were a bit odd???.Firstly the so called big earners wernt in the team ete which if I was him would have been a bonus???.Also make these comments pre match not after failing to score against a team leaking goals and struggling.Finally if utd had won the game he probably would have not discussed this.Managers have passion and class generally whatever the result,he has passion but for me not much class.Be interesting if anyother clubs team situation gets mentioned in his interviews if sufc fail to take the points after dominating games the rest of the season ??rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
are united fans really that stubborn? or stupid?

 

I for one have tried to explain NOBODY wanted Dawson to be dropped, as for Jos, this result means nothing, i didnt fancy Jos coming in, i wasnt happy with things after he came in, im certainly not happy now (BUT it goes deeper than Jos i believe) why arent we STILL (for the best part of 2 years) not playing half of our 1st team?

As for the result...like i have already said the result wasnt a "good" result, but its work in progress, we stopped the rot, we were letting i so many goals per match it needed to be stopped...it was

 

---------- Post added 12-11-2018 at 14:58 ----------

 

yup since half of em arent playing, and we are playing the younguns

 

 

Oh !! the momment your called stupid by "the bell" HA HA ...am still in mourning at the loss of two points, and the loss of 2 day income for my visit to the Lane...while some still await their first ever game..preaching on forums about a topic you dont have first hand experience !!! NOW THATS REAL STUPID.:love:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm... :huh:

 

... can anyone please tell me how long this excuse of not playing the "first team" is going to go on?

 

We're nearly half way through the season now and yet these "young uns" are still apparently not "first team" players.

 

It must do their confidence a world of good if they happen to read this sort of rubbish posted by so-called "fans"... :roll:

itll go on as long as we dont have players playing like Westwood, Hutchinson, Hooper, Lee, Foresteri who have been out for nigh on 2 years, plus others like Abdi

These i class as the first team, as they would and have been the first on the teamsheet

 

---------- Post added 12-11-2018 at 16:19 ----------

 

Oh !! the momment your called stupid by "the bell" HA HA ...am still in mourning at the loss of two points, and the loss of 2 day income for my visit to the Lane...while some still await their first ever game..preaching on forums about a topic you dont have first hand experience !!! NOW THATS REAL STUPID.:love:

:roll:

so you havent got any replies to the points i mentioned?

 

---------- Post added 12-11-2018 at 16:21 ----------

 

Oh no, I said squad. Even at full strength, which never seems to happen due to 'injuries', it's still a mid table squad at best.

sadly it looks like we wont find out about a "full" strength squad as it looks like the older more experienced players arent gonna play. Mid table it is...at best

Edited by melthebell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm... :huh:

 

... can anyone please tell me how long this excuse of not playing the "first team" is going to go on?

 

We're nearly half way through the season now and yet these "young uns" are still apparently not "first team" players.

 

It must do their confidence a world of good if they happen to read this sort of rubbish posted by so-called "fans"... :roll:

 

I mentioned in my post earlier three players - Winnall, Forestieri and Matias who had they been fit would have all more likely have started on Friday night, the others like Abdi, Jones and Boyd seem to be totally out of the managers plans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
itll go on as long as we dont have players playing like Westwood, Hutchinson, Hooper, Lee, Foresteri who have been out for nigh on 2 years, plus others like Abdi

These i class as the first team, as they would and have been the first on the teamsheet

 

---------- Post added 12-11-2018 at 16:19 ----------

 

:roll:

so you havent got any replies to the points i mentioned?

 

---------- Post added 12-11-2018 at 16:21 ----------

 

sadly it looks like we wont find out about a "full" strength squad as it looks like the older more experienced players arent gonna play. Mid table it is...at best

 

Melll , you have hurt my feeling, am too distressed to debate anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Billy Sharp ? But they've sold him about 5 times

 

Good result for Wednesday, battered in terms of possession but not really opened up other than the pen & Sharp's header.

 

And the strange fixation with the opposition budget continues

 

All the blades academy players are in the Premier league .Please wake up and pay attention.

 

---------- Post added 12-11-2018 at 16:42 ----------

 

I have just realised that Wednesday had five academy youngsters in their team of big hitters .While their real big hitters were still sat in the stands that is.

How many of Uniteds famous academy was there outon the pitch.

 

All in the Prem league where they belong,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All the blades academy players are in the Premier league .Please wake up and pay attention.

 

---------- Post added 12-11-2018 at 16:42 ----------

 

 

All in the Prem league where they belong,

 

Not so sure that's something to be proud of actually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
itll go on as long as we dont have players playing like Westwood, Hutchinson, Hooper, Lee, Foresteri who have been out for nigh on 2 years, plus others like Abdi

These i class as the first team, as they would and have been the first on the teamsheet

Hmmm... :huh:

 

So when exactly, in your opinion, do the "young uns" become "first team" players then?

 

Do they have to wait until the "big names" are all sold before they finally inherit the title of "first team" player?

 

And how you can regard someone who has not played for almost 2 years as a "first team" player is beyond me. It's just ludicrous.

 

We might as well claim that Tony Currie is one of our "first team" players. :hihi:

 

This whole excuse really is an absolute nonsense and is disrespectful to the "young uns" who are keeping the club going... :roll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not so sure that's something to be proud of actually.

 

well it should be knowing that most of our young babes are wanted by the prem is something to be proud of i think it show what a great academy we have that has earned a few million quid.Before you come with that one about we should have kept them we unlike some live in the real world .When a Prem club come knocking no way can you keep them when you are in the pub league .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
well it should be knowing that most of our young babes are wanted by the prem is something to be proud of i think it show what a great academy we have that has earned a few million quid.Before you come with that one about we should have kept them we unlike some live in the real world .When a Prem club come knocking no way can you keep them when you are in the pub league .

 

It's lucky you reinvested the money that you made selling the young uns on the squad, oh, hang on...…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm... :huh:

 

So when exactly, in your opinion, do the "young uns" become "first team" players then?

 

Do they have to wait until the "big names" are all sold before they finally inherit the title of "first team" player?

 

And how you can regard someone who has not played for almost 2 years as a "first team" player is beyond me. It's just ludicrous.

 

We might as well claim that Tony Currie is one of our "first team" players. :hihi:

 

This whole excuse really is an absolute nonsense and is disrespectful to the "young uns" who are keeping the club going... :roll:

you know what i meant, all our established good experienced players have been out for nigh on 2 years, we now have an almost full squad of inexperienced youngsters, so we are struggling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shocking isn't it how poor the Wednesday squad is now, after all the money spent.

Watch my lips ,the main money are not playing due to injury or being loaned out.

 

---------- Post added 12-11-2018 at 19:04 ----------

 

Hmmm... :huh:

 

... can anyone please tell me how long this excuse of not playing the "first team" is going to go on?

 

We're nearly half way through the season now and yet these "young uns" are still apparently not "first team" players.

 

It must do their confidence a world of good if they happen to read this sort of rubbish posted by so-called "fans"... :roll:

But its smiler Wilder who keeps going on about the big hitters from Sheffield six he conveniently over looks the youngsters Wednesday are having to pick as well as his own loan players who must be worth millions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.