Bartfarst   10 #37 Posted June 4, 2006 lawyers would not take on cases that are hopeless if they knew they would not get paid. Very, very true. And we all know that lawyers knowingly defend people they know to be guilty as sin - because they're being handsomely paid, not because they feel some moral obligation.  That's why my lawyer has bought a brand new Range Rover and a brand new TVR this year. Mind you, he's good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hagardriley   10 #38 Posted June 4, 2006 What a lawyer says about a client must always be taken with a pinch of salt as it is not impartial.  Absolutely right, but let's not lose sight of the fact that, in the case of the CPS the client is the Crown, therefore whatever they say about the prosecutions case should also be taken with a pinch of salt for the same reasons. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
redrobbo   10 #39 Posted June 4, 2006 yawn...well im off to bed now...gotta go to work...dont have the pleasure of living of the dole cheque....stay on  Early bed? Need your sleep for work tomorrow? Need a clear head to think? Hmmm .... you're not a lawyer by any chance? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Teabag   10 #40 Posted June 4, 2006 lawyers would not take on cases that are hopeless if they knew they would not get paid.  I suppose when you go into work Monday morning, you will tell the boss that you will work for free from now on? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
bobby   10 #41 Posted June 4, 2006 I suppose when you go into work Monday morning, you will tell the boss that you will work for free from now on? i don't think so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hagardriley   10 #42 Posted June 4, 2006 am i right in saying that we have the finest legal system in the world?  Of course you are!  In fact, as we speak, I have Lord Lucan living in my garden shed writing an article on the subject, which he will later this week deliver to The Star having been transported there in a carriage driven by Elvis and pulled by Shergar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Zebra   10 #43 Posted June 5, 2006 Isn't it the lawyers job to defend them even if they ARE guilty, so long as the suspects keeping saying they are innocent? If that's the case, they can keep pleading innocence and the lawyer must plead innocent on their behalf, even if they know it's most likely a lie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Nicholarse   10 #44 Posted June 5, 2006 yawn...well im off to bed now...gotta go to work...dont have the pleasure of living of the dole cheque....stay on  And I get called a troll?  Madness.  NM Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cliff Clavin   10 #45 Posted June 5, 2006 She insits they are wrong because she is impartial to the case by law and if the suspects claim to be innocent then by the law of the land they are innocent unless proved guilty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
youwhatref   10 #46 Posted June 5, 2006 Not read the full thread but it just shows the problem we have  We have the possiblity that a group of British born asains want to create a chemical bomb to murder hundreds/thousands of us and then we have one person shot as part of an anti-terror. Guess which gets more coverage Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Toby   10 #47 Posted June 5, 2006 well i personally think they are probably guilty ..  Eh?  What do you base that on?  The colour of their skin? The Sunday People? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
artisan   10 #48 Posted June 5, 2006 If these guys are so innocent, then why were they in the frame in the first place. Was a perfectly random selection made for an investigation lasting months. And a raid involving 250 coppers and hundreds more staff made purely on a whim. Further more why did the guy start fighting with the police, steal a gun and fire off a shot? These are not the actions of innocent people mixed up in something they do not understand. What amuses me is the report that the injured guy was in his 'pyjamas', as if he was in flanellette stripy things people wear in bed. Pyjamas are the day to day street clothes of people who live in warmer climes, and are now to be seen in any city street, along with women dressed like The Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...