anlabystreet   12 #1 Posted June 4, 2006 and furthermore..who pays her vast fees?? is it her client or is it joe muggins again? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
d71146 Â Â 10 #2 Posted June 4, 2006 and furthermore..who pays her vast fees?? is it her client or is it joe muggins again? Â It will not be her client you can bet your life on that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Nicholarse   10 #3 Posted June 4, 2006 and furthermore..who pays her vast fees?? is it her client or is it joe muggins again?  What the hell is wrong with you?  Never heard of the idea of innocent until PROVEN guilty?  NM Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Solomon1 Â Â 10 #4 Posted June 4, 2006 and furthermore..who pays her vast fees?? is it her client or is it joe muggins again? Â Tut tut anlaby Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
anlabystreet   12 #5 Posted June 4, 2006 look here mister brainless nicolarse-hole!!!!!i never said innocent or guilty..i asked how the woman knew they were innocent..was she there at the time ???and i also asked who paid her fees...neither question had anything to do with your idiotic response....try reading the question and get back on the flags on cars thread and make some daft comments on that you stupid pratt!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
burny   10 #6 Posted June 4, 2006 Who is to say whether they are guilty or innocent. Too many people assume that people who are arrested under the "terrorism law" are guilty.  Look at that poor Menezes guy who was doing nothing wrong and was murdered. And then cops tried to cover it up and said he was doing stuff he wasn't!  Bush & Blair have got some people right where they want them... they mention the word terrorism and everyone shivers and blames whoever the news want you to blame. The whole thing is driving me up the wall!  Edit: Example: http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article621189.ece Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #7 Posted June 4, 2006 and furthermore..who pays her vast fees?? is it her client or is it joe muggins again?  Why does it worry you so much? If it is the taxpayer you can bet your life you wouldn't be shouting so loud if it was you who eneded up on the wrong end of the law. It's her job to represent her client; it's what she does. The facts will be established in court, that's how it goes in this country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
burny   10 #8 Posted June 4, 2006 Why does it worry you so much? If it is the taxpayer you can bet your life you wouldn't be shouting so loud if it was you who eneded up on the wrong end of the law. It's her job to represent her client; it's what she does. The facts will be established in court, that's how it goes in this country.  Exactly! Afterall it is her job to try and prove them innocent! Wouldn't look good if she was shouting about how guilty they were Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
anlabystreet   12 #9 Posted June 4, 2006 whatever the rights and wrongs of it all one thing is for certain...lawyers are mercenary and money grabbing....they have about as much idea as the rest of us who did it but because the taxpayer is funding their lifestyle it doesnt matter...they dont deal in justice..their interest lies only in how much money they can make...and that makes them as criminal as the guilty...to see that woman on tv making comments and judgments that she couldnt possibly know all for the sake of a fat fee is sickening Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Dj_Shadowman   10 #10 Posted June 4, 2006 look here mister brainless nicolarse-hole!!!!!i never said innocent or guilty.  The guy is a DJ - winds people up for a living Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
anlabystreet   12 #11 Posted June 4, 2006 The guy is a DJ - winds people up for a living ....oh he's a dj ok...dysfunctional jerk!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #12 Posted June 4, 2006 whatever the rights and wrongs of it all one thing is for certain...lawyers are mercenary and money grabbing....they have about as much idea as the rest of us who did it but because the taxpayer is funding their lifestyle it doesnt matter...they dont deal in justice..their interest lies only in how much money they can make...and that makes them as criminal as the guilty...to see that woman on tv making comments and judgments that she couldnt possibly know all for the sake of a fat fee is sickening  Only in how much money they make? Has it occurred to you thay she was acting as she was because of professional ethics? Or indeed because the client she is reprsenting could indeed be wholly innocent? See the Menezes case, or that guy who was sat in his car ten or nore years ago and riddled with bullets by Police officers who later conceded they'd got the wrong man? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...