Cyclone   10 #25 Posted July 30, 2018 If it were for that then surely it would only apply to high sided vehicles? And indeed it could be switched on and off depending on the wind conditions!  ---------- Post added 30-07-2018 at 18:15 ----------  A friend of mine goes to visit relatives in South Asia for a few months every year and looks great on his return. Within a few months of being here again he looks ill. I would defo say there is a pollution problem in Sheffield. I like to get out into Derbyshire at least every few weeks for a blast of fresh air.  Perhaps it's the holiday rather than anything to do with pollution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Phili Buster   10 #26 Posted July 31, 2018 Thought the 60 limit, from j28 to j35, normally imposed during rush hour Monday - Friday 16:00 - 18:00 (don't know about morning) and also includes Bank Holidays. Nothing to do with wind conditions, automatically set to control pollution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Guest busdriver1   #27 Posted August 4, 2018 really? source? in the mean time, from DEFRA https://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/air-pollution/causes  Particulates : road transport  Nitrogen oxides : road transport, followed by electricity generation  Ozone : conversion from NOX (see above)  Sulphur dioxide : power generation  polycyclic hydrocarbons : domestic coal and wood burning  carbon monoxide : road transport  Since by implication you are saying i am a liar, read this. FULLY  https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2010/sep/09/carbon-emissions-planes-shipping Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cyclone   10 #28 Posted August 4, 2018 Since by implication you are saying i am a liar, read this. FULLY https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2010/sep/09/carbon-emissions-planes-shipping  I think you've missed the point though. Whilst the polluting effects of air travel are high, they're not localised and clearly not having an effect in Sheffield that is greater than the very localised effects of car pollution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
geared   318 #29 Posted August 4, 2018 I think you've missed the point though. Whilst the polluting effects of air travel are high, they're not localised and clearly not having an effect in Sheffield that is greater than the very localised effects of car pollution.  The same can be said for the ocean shipping industry. A massive contributor to global pollution, but since it's rarely detected on a local scale few people care about it.  It seems people either care about pollution on a local or a global level, rarely both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Guest busdriver1 Â Â #30 Posted August 4, 2018 The same can be said for the ocean shipping industry. A massive contributor to global pollution, but since it's rarely detected on a local scale few people care about it. Â It seems people either care about pollution on a local or a global level, rarely both. Â Strangely, the article seems to suggest that shipping is not the major issue it has been made out to be. The article does however state that Air traffic via vapour trails is the one that needs the most urgent attention. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
barmyowls   11 #31 Posted August 4, 2018 Those in power in Sheffield don't care , So not much will get done about it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cyclone   10 #32 Posted August 5, 2018 The same can be said for the ocean shipping industry. A massive contributor to global pollution, but since it's rarely detected on a local scale few people care about it.  It seems people either care about pollution on a local or a global level, rarely both.  This thread is very specifically about local pollution though isn't it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
ads36 Â Â 219 #33 Posted August 5, 2018 I'd have thought so... Â Is pollution from air travel a problem? Yes. Â What can sheff council do about it? Nothing at all. Â Is localised pollution from road traffic a problem? Yes. Â What can SCC do about it? Loads. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Planner1 Â Â 438 #34 Posted August 5, 2018 Is localised pollution from road traffic a problem? Yes. Â What can SCC do about it? Loads. And they are already doing a lot. Â The electric taxi trial, which is the subject of a thread on here, is one of them: https://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1547980 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
geared   318 #35 Posted August 6, 2018 Strangely, the article seems to suggest that shipping is not the major issue it has been made out to be. The article does however state that Air traffic via vapour trails is the one that needs the most urgent attention.  Yet you'll read another article and the story would be the total opposite :huh:  This thread is very specifically about local pollution though isn't it.  True we don't get many ships though, but then don't some of the proposed solutions for local pollution just end up shifting the problem to elsewhere? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
The Joker   10 #36 Posted August 6, 2018 Is pollution from air travel a problem? Yes. What can sheff council do about it?  Close down our airport Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...