Jump to content

Military action against assad.

Recommended Posts

Serious question , yes the French do seem to be keen but why ?

 

Have a look at which countries make the most armaments and that may give a clue. All these arms are just ready for the job so they will then have a good reason to produce more to replace the ones used.

Edited by apelike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Tony Blair has said Britain should support taking military action against Bashar al-Assad in response to the use of chemical weapons in Syria."

 

Not quite the same.

 

Not quite the same,but same end result.Russia wants impartial tests on the bombed sites,that alone should make sense but the us and allies still want to bomb assad. I hope may has to put it to the vote and it gets a landslide no. Remember blair acted on false info before and look what happened,the man is mad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good question. I don't know any definitive answer but I believe they had some sort of colonial influence (just googled - French mandate for Syria and Lebanon) so that's one main reason perhaps. New-ish, young leader keen to get front and centre on the world stage? We had one of those.

 

May I think is keen to get involved to deflect from brexit, and show trump how awesome/compliant we are plus theres the whole Russian thing that's bubbling away.

 

We don't need to get involved. May really needs to take this to parliament - that's why it's there.

 

Could the whole Russian poisoning thing be part of a plan to win hearts and minds to support going in do you think? (In which case it seems to have backfired,) or is it just a coincidence / distraction?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Could the whole Russian poisoning thing be part of a plan to win hearts and minds to support going in do you think? (In which case it seems to have backfired,) or is it just a coincidence / distraction?

 

I still reckon Putin or at the very least Russian higher ups were heavily involved in that poisoning in Salisbury but that's really a sideshow the big show in Syria.

 

Truth is, nobody knows. The press in this country really doesn't appear keen if the front pages are anything to go on. Trump appears to be initiating an armed strike through the medium of Twitter. That's a worry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Syrian people; men, women, and children, have been bombed and possibly attacked with chemical weapons. Call me daft, but I fail to see how bombing them with American, French and British bombs as well, is going to make their lives any better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Syrian people; men, women, and children, have been bombed and possibly attacked with chemical weapons. Call me daft, but I fail to see how bombing them with American, French and British bombs as well, is going to make their lives any better.

 

I think the so called rebels have launched the chemical attack specifically so that the West gets involved and bombs Assad for them.

The west have fell for it like muppets and I actually hope that Putin retaliates and shows the US and others that he means business.

In the link I posted earlier it states 8000 civilians were killed in the retaking of Mosul in Iraq but not a peep was heard about that.

Edited by mafya

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to know what Tony Blair actually talked about as 'Peace envoy to the Middle East.'

 

Whatever it was there's been nothing but trouble there so it definately hasn't been working.

 

Unless it was all about selling weapons to both sides, in much the same way as sending in a 'Peace keeping force' usually means bombing and shooting the **** out of the locals.

He's got to have earned his £millions somehow...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why can't he keep his stupidity to himself?

 

Because the legal authorities didn't do their duty and see him imprisoned for life for starting a previous war based on nothing but lies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Syrian people; men, women, and children, have been bombed and possibly attacked with chemical weapons. Call me daft, but I fail to see how bombing them with American, French and British bombs as well, is going to make their lives any better.

 

Come on Anna, you're not daft, you must realise the idea is to target the people who are bombing the men, women and children you refer to. You can't seriously think the idea is to keep on bombing those same people?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peter Ford on BBC this morning putting up a good defence not to make an attack on Syria.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the time for Putin to prove himself a super power leader by bringing common sense into the equation. Al-Qaeda hide amongst the innocents and Assad poisons all and sundry, why don’t they make him an offer he can’t refuse, like his life?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Peter Ford on BBC this morning putting up a good defence not to make an attack on Syria.

 

What was he saying?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.