Should Corbyn ignore the smears against him?

[I1L2T3 10]

Well I going to ask it because you are very fond of asking it but Proof Please

 

This has the bones of what the risks are in a US trade deal

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/07/theresa-may-refuses-to-rule-out-nhs-contracts-from-us-trade-deals

 

Very happy to develop this theme in the coming days.

[Top Cats Hat 10]

Back on topic, an interesting study has just been done by Loughborough University into all aspects of media coverage of the 2017 election campaign. It is a lot to digest but if you scroll down to Fig. 3-2 you will see a graphic representation of the positive/negative coverage by the newspapers for all the major parties.

 

Looking at that in the light of how close Labour came to winning that election, it seems that the right wing press is now a busted flush as far as influence over an electorate goes.

 

I say again, Corbyn can quite safely ignore these smears and negative coverage as they seem to be making little difference to how people vote on the day.

 

https://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/general-election/media-coverage-of-the-2017-general-election-campaign-report-4/

[Naive 10]

I simply look for the best price. Would you pay £20 when you can get the exact same thing for £9 somewhere else. ?

 

It pays to shop around .

 

It certainly pays the organised criminals and terrorists. They get their money from you and your fellow travellers. They use that money to deal drugs, buy explosives, run training camps and kill people.

 

Sleep tight Penny.

[Bob Arctor 11]

It certainly pays the organised criminals and terrorists. They get their money from you and your fellow travellers. They use that money to deal drugs, buy explosives, run training camps and kill people.

 

Sleep tight Penny.

 

Obviously he'll be asking for the free treatment that he didn't contribute towards when his lungs start packing in.