Baron99   795 #169 Posted April 23, 2018 The Mayor who abolished the bus lanes was Joe Anderson I know Liverpool is odd and has two mayors: https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/two-mayors-war-over-claims-13246519  Liverpool doesn't have 2 Mayors; nor does any other city / town as far as I know?  The thread is about regional Mayors. Totally different.  When the new S. Yorks Mayor is elected, Sheffield, Barnsley, Doncaster & Rotherham will still have theirs. Local councillors with a casting vote. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Dan_Ashcroft   10 #170 Posted April 23, 2018 Liverpool doesn't have 2 Mayors; nor does any other city / town as far as I know?  The thread is about regional Mayors. Totally different.  When the new S. Yorks Mayor is elected, Sheffield, Barnsley, Doncaster & Rotherham will still have theirs. Local councillors with a casting vote.  The Liverpool Mayor is a directly elected one though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayor_of_Liverpool. Like the London Mayor  Whereas the existing Sheffield Mayor is a ceremonial Lord Mayor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mayors_of_Sheffield  If you count Liverpool's Lord Mayor, then they actually have 3 mayors Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Baron99   795 #171 Posted April 23, 2018 The Liverpool Mayor is a directly elected one though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayor_of_Liverpool. Like the London Mayor Whereas the existing Sheffield Mayor is a ceremonial Lord Mayor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mayors_of_Sheffield  If you count Liverpool's Lord Mayor, then they actually have 3 mayors  Find a mirror & have a good word with yourself.  ---------- Post added 23-04-2018 at 15:51 ----------  Wikipedia. The Encyclopedia Britannica for the new millennium. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Anna B Â Â 1,414 #172 Posted April 23, 2018 I believe (you'll correct me if I'm wrong) that this idea of a regional Mayor is a government idea, and the regions have been 'bribed' with a promise of funds to go along with it. Â So my question is - what's in it for the government? What is the rationale behind having a regional Mayor? What are these Mayors supposed to do that a council and CEO can't do? I know it worked in London with high profile Boris, less so with Javid. Â But none of the candidates here have the same flair for publicity as Boris has. I really don't see the point. And knowing this government here'll be a downside in the small print that we haven't heard about yet... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
kaytie   11 #173 Posted April 23, 2018 Ooh I'll vote for anyone who'd build a replica Globe Theatre in Sheffield Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
andyofborg   11 #174 Posted April 23, 2018 Ooh I'll vote for anyone who'd build a replica Globe Theatre in Sheffield ��  we should have one of these instead  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wyld%27s_Great_Globe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
HairFarceOne   12 #175 Posted April 23, 2018 I believe (you'll correct me if I'm wrong) that this idea of a regional Mayor is a government idea, and the regions have been 'bribed' with a promise of funds to go along with it. So my question is - what's in it for the government? What is the rationale behind having a regional Mayor? What are these Mayors supposed to do that a council and CEO can't do? I know it worked in London with high profile Boris, less so with Javid.  But none of the candidates here have the same flair for publicity as Boris has. I really don't see the point. And knowing this government here'll be a downside in the small print that we haven't heard about yet...  The idea is that Central Government can devolve infrastructural powers that they would ordinarily be concerned with, local transport, roads, building etc. The idea is that at a regional level, money could be better targeted at regional infrastructure projects. One that springs to mind is the conversion of the A64 to a dual carriageway for it's full length (talked about by Central Government for over 30 years but only partially implemented). This would help solve congestion problems and allow the Yorkshire coastal towns to help maximise their potential for tourism etc. It may not have a direct impact on day to day South Yorks. but would help to generate an increase in the Yorkshire economy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Anna B Â Â 1,414 #176 Posted April 23, 2018 The idea is that Central Government can devolve infrastructural powers that they would ordinarily be concerned with, local transport, roads, building etc. The idea is that at a regional level, money could be better targeted at regional infrastructure projects. One that springs to mind is the conversion of the A64 to a dual carriageway for it's full length (talked about by Central Government for over 30 years but only partially implemented). This would help solve congestion problems and allow the Yorkshire coastal towns to help maximise their potential for tourism etc. It may not have a direct impact on day to day South Yorks. but would help to generate an increase in the Yorkshire economy. Â Mmm .... maybe. Â Call me a cynic, but it sounds to me like they are trying to offload areas that are problematic with a handful of cash and then wash their hands of them. Â The money won't be enough to cover it of course, (like with the councils) and they will be expected to do miracles with very little. If they don't succeed it will be their fault, and nothing to do with the government. Â In these radically changing times, I don't think this government has any idea what to do with anywhere north of Watford. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
smiggs   10 #177 Posted April 23, 2018  In these radically changing times, I don't think this government has any idea what to do with anywhere north of Watford.  That's the whole point of devolving powers locally, give the Mayor advised by councillors some real power to make infrastructure decisions. Unfortunately because of the South Yorkshire councils falling out it doesn't look like we'll get the £30 million budget or the powers to make change. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad   3,976 #178 Posted April 23, 2018 Mmm .... maybe.  Call me a cynic, but it sounds to me like they are trying to offload areas that are problematic with a handful of cash and then wash their hands of them.  The money won't be enough to cover it of course, (like with the councils) and they will be expected to do miracles with very little. If they don't succeed it will be their fault, and nothing to do with the government.  In these radically changing times, I don't think this government has any idea what to do with anywhere north of Watford.  Don't worry , chances are the mayor will be the Labour chap who has millions to spend and then you will be able to hold him to account Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
taxman   12 #179 Posted April 23, 2018 Seems a bit like the Police Commisioner or whatever he's called. A nice pay packet but get him to actually do something and there's no power. "That's an operational matter". Could almost be . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
hackey lad   3,976 #180 Posted April 23, 2018 Seems a bit like the Police Commisioner or whatever he's called. A nice pay packet but get him to actually do something and there's no power. "That's an operational matter". Could almost be .  Totally agree Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...