Jump to content

Mr Trump - All discussion here

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Magilla said:

Zero chance, along with all those Rittenhouse cases, it's going nowhere...

 

...your gullibility tho... workin' overtime! :roll: :hihi:

 

The US is interesting right now.

Just before the whole Trump raid , the internet provocateur known as Q woke up after 18 months of silence following the January 6th rampage.

 

A summary of Q's posts on 8Kun/8ch.net forum can be found here: https://qaggregator.news/

 

Just before the Riots, Q posted a link to 1980s hair metal band, Twisted Sisters' hit - "We're not going to take it."   That link is now down, but the video and song is here:   

 

 

 

Quite why Q couldn't have picked something by Sheffield's Def Leppard, we'll never know!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Mikhail_Lieb said:

Quite why Q couldn't have picked something by Sheffield's Def Leppard, we'll never know!!!

Q has a habit of getting it completely wrong 100% of the time... which probably explains it. :hihi:

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

It's absolutely delicious that there's apparently a Mar-a-Largo mole. He (or she, right Mel?) knew not only that Team Trump had been decidedly less than truthful about the extent of the appropriation of official classified documents from the White House, but exactly where the remaining cache could be found, including in a safe.

 

I don't suspect any degree of conscience, or of 'doing the right thing' here; rather I bet arses are being covered because they know what a tsunami of dung could be rolling on in: some of said classified documents related to nuclear weapons.  Wonder what the going rate is for the information contained in those sorts of documents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hecate said:

It's absolutely delicious that there's apparently a Mar-a-Largo mole. He (or she, right Mel?) knew not only that Team Trump had been decidedly less than truthful about the extent of the appropriation of official classified documents from the White House, but exactly where the remaining cache could be found, including in a safe.

 

I don't suspect any degree of conscience, or of 'doing the right thing' here; rather I bet arses are being covered because they know what a tsunami of dung could be rolling on in: some of said classified documents related to nuclear weaponsWonder what the going rate is for the information contained in those sorts of documents.

Do you want that answer in USD or Rubles? 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Wall Street Journal Opinion

 

"Mara-la-Go And The Swamp's Obsession With Donald Trump    

"The Payback for Mar-a-Lago Will Be Brutal

"What went around Monday will come around hard for the Democrats when Republicans control the Justice Department and FBI.

"An FBI raid against a former president should never happen. End of discussion"

 

"Trump derangement syndrome has a curious way of scrambling coherent thought. Witness the Democratic-media complex’s blind insistence the Justice Department raid on Donald Trump’s home is just and necessary—rather than a dangerous move for their party and the republic.

 

"In descending on Mar-a-Lago, the department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation shifted the U.S. into the category of countries whose ruling parties use government power to investigate political rivals. No attorney general has ever signed off on a raid on a former president’s home, in what could be the groundwork for criminal charges".

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-payback-for-mar-a-lago-will-be-brutal-trump-raid-fbi-justice-department-president-investigation-11660255311?st=k908p5cb719bgq0&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Magilla said:

Some people really will believe anything :?

 

There isn't if you know you're wrong :?

 

You're right... you're no lawyer :thumbsup:

 

For being completely accurate? Nope... he would lose.

 

There will be no court action from Trump.

Don’t put lots off money on it with book makers I think Donald will score a duck .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, trastrick said:

The Wall Street Journal Opinion

 

"Mara-la-Go And The Swamp's Obsession With Donald Trump    

"The Payback for Mar-a-Lago Will Be Brutal

"What went around Monday will come around hard for the Democrats when Republicans control the Justice Department and FBI.

"An FBI raid against a former president should never happen. End of discussion"

 

"Trump derangement syndrome has a curious way of scrambling coherent thought. Witness the Democratic-media complex’s blind insistence the Justice Department raid on Donald Trump’s home is just and necessary—rather than a dangerous move for their party and the republic.

 

"In descending on Mar-a-Lago, the department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation shifted the U.S. into the category of countries whose ruling parties use government power to investigate political rivals. No attorney general has ever signed off on a raid on a former president’s home, in what could be the groundwork for criminal charges".

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-payback-for-mar-a-lago-will-be-brutal-trump-raid-fbi-justice-department-president-investigation-11660255311?st=k908p5cb719bgq0&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

This raid won't have the desired effect for the democrats.  They think they have been clever when in fact all they have done is hit the self destruct button. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, trastrick said:

The Wall Street Journal Opinion

 

First of all. It's an opinion piece by one person in the WSJ, not the WSJ's opinion as you imply. You've conflated opinion pieces with the opinion of publications before - they are not synonymous. Frequently, they are written by people who oppose the editorial line to give readers a different viewpoint from the one they normally read.

 

Kimberley Strassel

Quote

By October 2019, President Donald Trump had tweeted about Strassel or retweeted her commentary more than 20 times, including calling for a Pulitzer Prize for her.[10]

 

Shortly before the November 2020 election, Strassel promoted claims about Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden in an opinion column in The Wall Street Journal.[11][12] Strassel's claims were contradicted by the newspaper's own reporting arm hours later.[12][13][14][15]

 

After Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election, Strassel claimed that the election contained voting irregularities.[16] In November 2020, Strassel made false claims about the election, incorrectly claiming that Wisconsin's turnout numbers for the election was "not feasible".[17][18]

Sounds like she's drunk on the Trump Kool-Aid. She has a history of writing false things about Biden. Not exactly the sort of person who would write the kind of reasoned impartial comment piece you're trying to present it as is she.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, trastrick said:

The Wall Street Journal Opinion

Is not the opinion of the WSJ or it's editorial board! :loopy:

 

This, however, *is* the opinion of the WSJ:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-president-who-stood-still-donald-trump-jan-6-committee-mike-pence-capitol-riot-11658528548

"The President Who Stood Still on Jan. 6"

 

This *is* the opinion of the New York Post:

https://nypost.com/2022/07/22/trumps-jan-6-silence-renders-him-unworthy-for-2024-reelection/

"Trump has proven himself unworthy to be this country’s chief executive again"

 

...both previously big supporters of Trump. :?

 

Quote

"In descending on Mar-a-Lago, the department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation shifted the U.S. into the category of countries whose ruling parties use government power to investigate political rivals.

The raid was conducted by an organisation run by a Trump appointee :roll:

 

Quote

No attorney general has ever signed off on a raid on a former president’s home, in what could be the groundwork for criminal charges".

The blindingly obvious, that Trump may have committed a crime, apparently beyond the ability of Kim to comprehend! :loopy:

 

Quote

So full of holes it's fit only for simpletons... an exercise in self delusion, and bending over backwards to avoid the obvious... :thumbsup:

 

Meanwhile, in the real world...

 

Merrick Garland calls Trump’s bluff:

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/08/11/merrick-garland-trump-bluff-00051297

 

Seems Trump has decided to go with "planted papers"...

 

  :?

Edited by Magilla

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol

 

Biden read about the raid “in the papers”

 

Like Hunters business dealings with Ukraine, China, Russia et al.

 

Did someone mention Coolade?

 

Anyway, the lynch mob of Trump haters have the rope all waxed and ready , as they have for the last 6 years.

 

But this time they can really taste it!

 

But they need a case, a charge, and a trial!

 

After 6 years and counting, how many liberals/socialists/communist lawyers does it take to screw in a light bulb?

 

Anybody?  :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, trastrick said:

Lol

 

Biden read about the raid “in the papers”

 

Like Hunters business dealings with Ukraine, China, Russia et al.

 

Did someone mention Coolade?

 

Anyway, the lynch mob of Trump haters have the rope all waxed and ready , as they have for the last 6 years.

 

But this time they can really taste it!

 

But they need a case, a charge, and a trial!

 

After 6 years and counting, how many liberals/socialists/communist lawyers does it take to screw in a light bulb?

 

Anybody?  :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

None. They just blame Trump for it not working.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, trastrick said:

Anyway, the lynch mob of Trump haters have the rope all waxed and ready , as they have for the last 6 years.

The only lynch mob were Trump supporters looking for Mike Pence at the Capitol when they were trying to prevent Trump's election loss from being put into effect.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.