trastrick   866 #5989 Posted June 29, 2022 Just now, Magilla said: Well, if that's the case it's fortunate that it was a Trump insider and former top aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows who made the claim!   Exactly how is someone from the Trump camp making these claims a Democratic plot? Lol  You don't know politics!  It's as old as Julius Caesar!  Lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Magilla   510 #5990 Posted June 29, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, trastrick said: You don't know politics! I understood it well enough to see your laughable Sussmann narrative wasn't going to fly...  ...and I can also remember stuff from before yesterday!  Quote It's as old as Julius Caesar! Sure, like Uranium One, Benghazi, Hillary-Gate, Seth-Rich, Pizza-Gate, and the Central Park Five...  ...can't really see why any Trump supporter could possibly complain.   But still, exactly how is someone from the Trump camp making these claims a Democratic plot?   Edited June 29, 2022 by Magilla Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
trastrick   866 #5991 Posted June 29, 2022 Just now, Magilla said: I understood it well enough to see your laughable Sussmann narrative wasn't going to fly...  ...and I can also remember stuff from before yesterday!  Sure, like Uranium One, Benghazi, Hillary-Gate, Seth-Rich, Pizza-Gate, and the Central Park Five...  ...can't really see why any Trump supporter could possibly complain.   But still, exactly how is someone from the Trump camp making these claims a Democratic plot?   Who mention the term "Democratic plot"  I mean, besides you?  Besides I always use the correct term for Democrats. As in "Democrat Trump witch hunt", above!  They are not "The Democratic Party", the correct term is The Democrat Party.  Have a nice day!  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Magilla   510 #5992 Posted June 29, 2022 (edited) 7 minutes ago, trastrick said: Who mention the term "Democratic plot" Sorry, of course that's *every other thread* regardless of relevance  "political dirty tricks on steroids"... in the case you highlight there aren't any...  ...beyond the ones you made up in your head!  Which part of reporting the testimony of someone giving evidence, and the response of those concerned, is the "political dirty tricks on steroids"?   Edited June 29, 2022 by Magilla Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
trastrick   866 #5993 Posted June 30, 2022 (edited) 19 hours ago, Magilla said: Sorry, of course that's *every other thread* regardless of relevance  "political dirty tricks on steroids"... in the case you highlight there aren't any...  ...beyond the ones you made up in your head!  Which part of reporting the testimony of someone giving evidence, and the response of those concerned, is the "political dirty tricks on steroids"?   Not calling before Pelosi's personal kangaroo "Panel",  the two Secret Service Agents who are willing to testify that the "bombshell" (hearsay) testimony the young lady gave against Trump, never happened.  They were actually there!  Some people!  Edited June 30, 2022 by trastrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Magilla   510 #5994 Posted June 30, 2022 50 minutes ago, trastrick said: Not calling before Pelosi's personal kangaroo "Panel",  the two Secret Service Agents who are willing to testify that the "bombshell" (hearsay) testimony the young lady gave against Trump, never happened. It's called "news"...  ...thanks for highlighting, yet again, that you have no concept of how it actually works! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
butlers   261 #5995 Posted June 30, 2022 One of the senior staffers who has denied it happened was taken to task by 3 other senior staffers yesterday for lying to them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
trastrick   866 #5996 Posted June 30, 2022 (edited) Magilla wrote:  "...thanks for highlighting, yet again, that you have no concept of how it actually works!  "  Only too well, pal!  The Democrat's President has today hit a new low in job approval, according to RCP Average of all polls. His fall is precipitious, probably unprecented.  https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president-biden-job-approval-7320.html  Facing a November wipeout at the polls, they have nothing to counter, except a desperate series of Pelosi Congressional kangaroo courts, where they are willing, nay desperate, to find anyone with any second hand rumor or heresay, who is prepared to make yet another allegation about their feared political opponent.  6 years now and counting, and not one, ONE allegation of wrongdoing that could stand up in a Court of Law.  Not even a speeding ticket! Lol  So they have some 80,000,000 people who voted against Trump. to pick from.  The "witnesses" will continue to be called, the subpoenas will continue to fly to all and sundry. and the show will go on, their pals in the Media will hype it to the sheep, until November, when the public will send tham a strong message, that they will not put up with this charade of show trial nonsense, worthy of a communist dictatorship, while their country turns into a basket case.  They'll demand actual governing from the politicians they are paying to do a job!  You'll see!  The latest scam:  Google's Gmail censorship cost GOP candidates $2B since 2019, Republicans say, citing new study Study found that Gmail flagged most GOP fundraising emails as spam, while allowing through most Dem emails  "The Republicans based their conclusions on a North Carolina State University study that found Gmail allows the vast majority of emails from Democratic to land in the user's inbox while more than two-thirds of messages from conservative candidates are marked as spam.  Gmail "retained the majority of left-wing candidate emails in inbox (< 10.12% marked as spam) while sent the majority of right-wing candidate emails to the spam folder (up to 77.2% marked as spam)," the study found https://www.foxnews.com/politics/google-gmail-censorship-cost-gop-candidates-2b-study  The study here:  https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.16743.pdf     Just now, butlers said: One of the senior staffers who has denied it happened was taken to task by 3 other senior staffers yesterday for lying to them Cite? Edited June 30, 2022 by trastrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
butlers   261 #5997 Posted June 30, 2022 As you know various people associated with the President were convicted.  Also 7 congressman it now seems requested pardons before he left office ,also the sign of a clear conscience.  Anyhow hope Merrick Garland will buck the historical trend of not criminally prosecuting former Presidents . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
altus   540 #5998 Posted June 30, 2022 17 minutes ago, trastrick said: The latest scam:  Google's Gmail censorship cost GOP candidates $2B since 2019, Republicans say, citing new study Study found that Gmail flagged most GOP fundraising emails as spam, while allowing through most Dem emails  "The Republicans based their conclusions on a North Carolina State University study that found Gmail allows the vast majority of emails from Democratic to land in the user's inbox while more than two-thirds of messages from conservative candidates are marked as spam.  Gmail "retained the majority of left-wing candidate emails in inbox (< 10.12% marked as spam) while sent the majority of right-wing candidate emails to the spam folder (up to 77.2% marked as spam)," the study found https://www.foxnews.com/politics/google-gmail-censorship-cost-gop-candidates-2b-study  The study here:  https://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.16743.pdf The paper also shows that Outlook and Yahoo marked Democrat emails as spam more than Republican ones. That fact seems to have escaped your attention.  From the discussion section of the report: Quote While we have no reason to believe that there were deliberate attempts from these email services to cre- ate these biases to influence the voters, the fact remains there that their SFAs have learnt to mark more emails from one political af- filiation as spam compared to the other.  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
trastrick   866 #5999 Posted June 30, 2022 Just now, butlers said: As you know various people associated with the President were convicted.  Also 7 congressman it now seems requested pardons before he left office ,also the sign of a clear conscience.  Anyhow hope Merrick Garland will buck the historical trend of not criminally prosecuting former Presidents . So no cite!  Thank you! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
trastrick   866 #6000 Posted June 30, 2022 (edited) Just now, altus said: The paper also shows that Outlook and Yahoo marked Democrat emails as spam more than Republican ones. That fact seems to have escaped your attention.  From the discussion section of the report:  A disparity of:  "Gmail marked 59.3% more emails from the right candidates as spam compared to the left candidates, whereas Outlook and Yahoo marked 20.4% and 14.2% more emails from left candidates as spam compared to the right candidates, respectively" (from the report)  Of course you can't prove intent, unless you have investigations, by muliiple governmental agencies, and maybe a Congressional kangaroo court!  So, they are deemed innocent, until proven guilty in a Court of Law!  Like Hillary, and like Trump  Edited June 30, 2022 by trastrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
