Jump to content

Mr Trump - All discussion here

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, The Joker said:

I'm looking to the feature film directed by Trump himself, where he personally leads the SEAL team into battle 😁

There was a Radio Four play about Trump recently that was a satire, but all of the crazy crackerjack nonsense his character said, could easily have come out of Trump’s mouth for real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Halibut said:

Which part of that headline is factually incorrect?

Al-Baghdadi - religious scholar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Halibut said:

Loud noise signifying nothing.

And how do you know he wasn't?

 

Yep, you are always ignorant of inconvenient truth.

Now tell me, do you consider him as a "religious scholar"? I just don't think he was, he didn't fulfill the definition. But please, prove me wrong, I might not understand what "religious scholar" in fact means.

Edited by Branyy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Branyy said:

Yep, you are always ignorant of inconvenient truth.

Now tell me, do you consider him as a "religious scholar"? I just don't think he was, he didn't fulfill the definition. But please, prove me wrong, I might not understand what "religious scholar" in fact means.

Well done, I agree, you don't know what it means ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Care to explain then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Branyy said:

Yep, you are always ignorant of inconvenient truth.

Now tell me, do you consider him as a "religious scholar"? I just don't think he was, he didn't fulfill the definition. But please, prove me wrong, I might not understand what "religious scholar" in fact means.

If you're claiming he wasn't, it's for you to disprove. That's how it works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Halibut said:

If you're claiming he wasn't, it's for you to disprove. That's how it works.

No, absolutely not, you got it confused. The original claim was that he was a "religious scholar". I've asked for evidence to support this claim. It must be based on something, right? I mean, everyone can be claimed as a "religious scholar" without a proof.  Get it? What qualifies him?

Edited by Branyy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Branyy said:

No, absolutely not, you got it confused. The original claim was that he was a "religious scholar". I've asked for evidence to support this claim. It must be based on something, right? I mean, everyone can be claimed as a "religious scholar" without a proof.  Get it? What qualifies him?

You might want to look up the definition of scholar before you go too far down the line of "What qualifies him?". There isn't a widely accepted formal definition of what qualifies someone as a scholar. It can be just someone who knows a lot about a subject because they studied it a lot (and not necessarily in a formal setting). Al-Baghdadi will count as a scholar because he, presumably, studied the Koran a lot.

 

By focusing on whether he counts as a scholar or not you are missing the point of why the Washington Post has been criticized for its description of him - it wasn't the most important thing about him or why he was in the news. It's as if they'd mentioned Jimmy Saville was known for running marathons and failed to mention he was a massive nonce.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BREAKING NEWS

 

They had their best investigative teams working on this. Whatever would the left do without the media fact checking memes for them. It is just a joke of a profession at this point. I  thought the media couldn’t get any stupider.. I was wrong.

 

 

K2X4gwW.jpg

 

EIKf-B3XUAAwE-k?format=jpg&name=small

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, XXTickerXX said:

BREAKING NEWS

 

They had their best investigative teams working on this. Whatever would the left do without the media fact checking memes for them. It is just a joke of a profession at this point. thought the media couldn’t get any stupider.. I was wrong.

 

 

K2X4gwW.jpg

 

EIKf-B3XUAAwE-k?format=jpg&name=small

Says the no.1 fangirl for the most stupid President in history.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Halibut said:

Says the no.1 fangirl for the most stupid President in history.

So Halibut, was Al-Baghdadi  a religious scholar or not? What do you think? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Halibut said:

Says the no.1 fangirl for the most stupid President in history.

You love him really. Do you want me to buy you a MAGA hat? Then maybe you could work towards being a billionaire with a supermodel wife and stop being angry all the time. Just 5 more years to go.

 

Why Trump won and why he will win again from Shark Tanks Kevin O’Leary

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.