Longcol 597 #3793 Posted October 28, 2019 On 27/10/2019 at 20:16, RJRB said: The killing of alBaghdadi may or may not have any telling effect on the future of IS .Probably do as much harm as good in reality. However Trumps triumphalist and banal press conference is totally about seeking personal credit to assist his Presidential campaign. This is a hollow response to the criticism he has got for his hasty withdrawal of troops from Syria. The response of the world series baseball crowd last night was quite telling. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-booed-baseball-game-world-series-astros-nationals-lock-him-up-chant-impeach-a9173801.html "Lock Him Up"! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
XXTickerXX 10 #3794 Posted October 29, 2019 Imagine a world where the left defends a man who oversaw the murder of hundreds of thousands of people, who used children as suicide bombers, who threw hundreds of gay people off buildings, who tortured people for fun, whose followers have raped tens of thousands of women, who taught children as young as 5 years old how to behead people, a man who owned sex slaves ..... That's the world we are living in right now. Their blind hatred of Trump will not allow them to see reality or think logically. They are now saying Baghdadi was not a coward because he blew himself and his children up!! What planet do they live on. They will be telling us how Hitler was just a struggling confused artist next. Good Doggy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
bendix 10 #3795 Posted October 29, 2019 Could you provide some sources whereby 'the left' (whatever that is) has defended Baghdadi? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut 12 #3796 Posted October 29, 2019 Which part of that headline is factually incorrect? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
melthebell 862 #3797 Posted October 29, 2019 7 hours ago, bendix said: Could you provide some sources whereby 'the left' (whatever that is) has defended Baghdadi? If you don't stand in a circle chanting scum scum scum and calling for his head you are a lover didn't you know? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Mister Gee 812 #3798 Posted October 29, 2019 Imagine defending this dunderhead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
The Joker 10 #3799 Posted October 29, 2019 7 hours ago, XXTickerXX said: Their blind hatred of Trump will not allow them to see reality or think logically. I'm looking to the feature film directed by Trump himself, where he personally leads the SEAL team into battle 😁 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Top Cats Hat 10 #3800 Posted October 29, 2019 10 minutes ago, The Joker said: I'm looking to the feature film directed by Trump himself, where he personally leads the SEAL team into battle 😁 There was a Radio Four play about Trump recently that was a satire, but all of the crazy crackerjack nonsense his character said, could easily have come out of Trump’s mouth for real. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Branyy 10 #3801 Posted October 29, 2019 2 hours ago, Halibut said: Which part of that headline is factually incorrect? Al-Baghdadi - religious scholar. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Branyy 10 #3802 Posted October 30, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, Halibut said: Loud noise signifying nothing. And how do you know he wasn't? Yep, you are always ignorant of inconvenient truth. Now tell me, do you consider him as a "religious scholar"? I just don't think he was, he didn't fulfill the definition. But please, prove me wrong, I might not understand what "religious scholar" in fact means. Edited October 30, 2019 by Branyy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
melthebell 862 #3803 Posted October 30, 2019 21 minutes ago, Branyy said: Yep, you are always ignorant of inconvenient truth. Now tell me, do you consider him as a "religious scholar"? I just don't think he was, he didn't fulfill the definition. But please, prove me wrong, I might not understand what "religious scholar" in fact means. Well done, I agree, you don't know what it means Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Branyy 10 #3804 Posted October 30, 2019 Care to explain then? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...