Jump to content

Mr Trump - All discussion here

Recommended Posts

On 01/12/2021 at 19:33, ECCOnoob said:

would rather stick pins in my groin.

 

A washed-up, impeached, racist, sexist, homophobic, likely criminal failure of a president being interviewed by washed up, racist, sexist,  xenophobic, serial failed to become a politician.

 

Who is seriously interested in anything either have to say apart from their deluded fans.

 

Tick tock..... tick tock....  Donnie.  Your friends with influence are collapsing day by day.  Your little circle of trust is being breached more and more.

 

Preaching to the already converted moronic flag wavers isn't going to save you.

Did you watch the programme and hear what he had to say directly instead of through the media ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, harvey19 said:

Did you watch the programme and hear what he had to say directly instead of through the media ?

Presumably Trump is still claiming he won the election despite having no evidence?

Edited by Longcol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Longcol said:

Presumably Trump is still claiming he won the election despite having no evidence?

What about the cleaning product sketch, did he do that one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even by Farages standards  he was olegenious.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, trastrick said:

Yep, we know!

 

Those World wide ant-vaxx protesters are getting secret telepathic messages from a former U.S. President who got vaccinated last January, and told his followers, "the vaccine is safe and that it works"!

 

Trump Tells Followers to Get Vaccinated Against Coronavirus

https://www.usnews.com › News › National News

"Mar 17, 2021 — The former president, who got vaccinated without fanfare in January, said the vaccine is safe and that it works".

 

But we know what he REALLY meant, don't we?

 

Lol

He will have been appointed Speaker of the House this time next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 02/12/2021 at 05:55, Magilla said:

Yawn... and yet the party of that President spent the week attacking the scientific head of that effort, trying to discredit him :?

You mean the liar that denied a "gain of function" grant to  communist Chinese Wuhan Biological Research Lab?

 

NIH Admits to Funding Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan ...

https://news.yahoo.com › nih-admits-funding-gain-func...

Oct 21, 2021 — A top NIH official admitted that U.S. taxpayers funded gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan.

 

In Major Shift, NIH Admits Funding Risky Virus Research in ...

https://www.vanityfair.com › News › coronavirus

Oct 22, 2021 — A spokesman for Dr. Fauci says he has been “entirely truthful,” but a new letter belatedly acknowledging the National Institutes of Health's ...

 

NIH ADMITS to funding gain-of-function research on bat...

https://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-10117619

Oct 21, 2021 — The National Institutes of Health has finally admitted to funding gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in it's Wuhan laboratory ...

 

Yawn  :)

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, trastrick said:

You mean the liar that denied a "gain of function" grant to  communist Chinese Wuhan Biological Research Lab?

The repeated claim that Fauci lied to Congress about ‘gain-of-function’ research:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/29/repeated-claim-that-fauci-lied-congress-about-gain-of-function-research/

"Two Pinocchios" :?

 

...but so much for that claim that anti-vaxers aren't taking their cues from Republican talking points! :thumbsup:

 

Q.E.D!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 03/12/2021 at 07:44, Magilla said:

The repeated claim that Fauci lied to Congress about ‘gain-of-function’ research:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/29/repeated-claim-that-fauci-lied-congress-about-gain-of-function-research/

"Two Pinocchios" :?

 

...but so much for that claim that anti-vaxers aren't taking their cues from Republican talking points! :thumbsup:

 

Q.E.D!

 

 

UPDATE!

 

"'Bombshell' NIH letter on bat coronavirus research reveals Fauci's big lie, professor says"

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/bombshell-nih-letter-on-bat-coronavirus-research-reveals-faucis-big-lie-professor-says

 

leading critic of the National Institutes of Health contends the federal agency “put at risk” U.S. public health and national security by funding a bat coronavirus research project by EcoHealth Alliance.

 

Richard Ebright, a professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University, told the Washington Examiner that a new letter in which the NIH conceded that the group run by Peter Daszak violated its rules when conducting bat coronavirus research is a "bombshell" admission because it “corrects the untruthful assertions” by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci and his boss, NIH Director Francis Collins, both of whom claim the NIH did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

 

 

Ebright’s assertions are challenged by the NIH, which continues to back the contentions made by Collins, who is retiring from his role , and Fauci on the politically charged issue that strikes at the root of the coronavirus pandemic.

 

Lawrence Tabak, the NIH's principal deputy director, said in the Wednesday letter that EcoHealth Alliance provided a five-year progress report on bat coronavirus research conducted under an NIH grant and that “in this limited experiment, laboratory mice infected with the SHC014 WIV1 bat coronavirus became sicker than those infected with the WIV1 bat coronavirus.”

 

“As sometimes occurs in science, this was an unexpected result of the research, as opposed to something that the researchers set out to do," the agency said, adding: “EcoHealth failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant.”

 

With critics, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, contending the letter confirms that the Wuhan lab collaborator had indeed been conducting gain-of-function research , Ebright said, “NIH's acknowledgment of the facts is new, but the facts themselves are not.” He insisted the NIH had been “informed about the gain-of-function research in Wuhan in 2018 and again in 2020.”

 

 

Fauci Was 'Untruthful' to Congress About Wuhan Lab Research

https://www.newsweek.com › ... › Rand Paul › Nih

 

Sep 9, 2021 — Newly released grant proposals indicate the National Institutes of Health funded controversial gain of function research—appearing to ...

https://www.newsweek.com › ... › Rand Paul › Nih

 

Maybe the WashPost will get around to "correcting" their reporting on this issue.

 

e.g.

 

The Washington Post corrects, removes parts of two stories ...

https://www.washingtonpost.com › style › 2021/11/12

Nov 12, 2021 — "New reporting and the recent indictment of a dossier contributor led The Post to decide it could no longer stand by the stories".

 

Lol

Edited by trastrick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, trastrick said:

UPDATE!

 

"'Bombshell' NIH letter on bat coronavirus research reveals Fauci's big lie, professor says"

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/bombshell-nih-letter-on-bat-coronavirus-research-reveals-faucis-big-lie-professor-says

 

leading critic of the National Institutes of Health contends the federal agency “put at risk” U.S. public health and national security by funding a bat coronavirus research project by EcoHealth Alliance.

 

Richard Ebright, a professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University, told the Washington Examiner that a new letter in which the NIH conceded that the group run by Peter Daszak violated its rules when conducting bat coronavirus research is a "bombshell" admission because it “corrects the untruthful assertions” by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci and his boss, NIH Director Francis Collins, both of whom claim the NIH did not fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

 

 

Ebright’s assertions are challenged by the NIH, which continues to back the contentions made by Collins, who is retiring from his role , and Fauci on the politically charged issue that strikes at the root of the coronavirus pandemic.

 

Lawrence Tabak, the NIH's principal deputy director, said in the Wednesday letter that EcoHealth Alliance provided a five-year progress report on bat coronavirus research conducted under an NIH grant and that “in this limited experiment, laboratory mice infected with the SHC014 WIV1 bat coronavirus became sicker than those infected with the WIV1 bat coronavirus.”

 

“As sometimes occurs in science, this was an unexpected result of the research, as opposed to something that the researchers set out to do," the agency said, adding: “EcoHealth failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant.”

 

With critics, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, contending the letter confirms that the Wuhan lab collaborator had indeed been conducting gain-of-function research , Ebright said, “NIH's acknowledgment of the facts is new, but the facts themselves are not.” He insisted the NIH had been “informed about the gain-of-function research in Wuhan in 2018 and again in 2020.”

 

 

Fauci Was 'Untruthful' to Congress About Wuhan Lab Research

https://www.newsweek.com › ... › Rand Paul › Nih

 

Sep 9, 2021 — Newly released grant proposals indicate the National Institutes of Health funded controversial gain of function research—appearing to ...

https://www.newsweek.com › ... › Rand Paul › Nih

Sep 9, 2021 — Newly released grant proposals indicate the National Institutes of Health funded controversial gain of function research—appearing to ...

 

Maybe the WashPost will get around to "correcting" their reporting on this issue.

 

e.g.

 

The Washington Post corrects, removes parts of two stories ...

https://www.washingtonpost.com › style › 2021/11/12

Nov 12, 2021 — "New reporting and the recent indictment of a dossier contributor led The Post to decide it could no longer stand by the stories".

 

Lol

Washington Examiner and Rand Paul in one post.

 

Dodgy as hell 😎

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Longcol said:

Washington Examiner and Rand Paul in one post.

 

Dodgy as hell 😎

Fauci, like Biden is a 50 year Swamp dweller, (on the taxpayer dime) now with his extended 15 minutes of fame working as "Biden's appointed " director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President (Biden)" Also CNN'S regular and always reliable Trump hater.  This very busy celeb has many hats!

 

Fauci (referring to his "turbulent" relationship with former President Trump) opined, "during his first press conference under the Biden administration, Fauci signaled the days of overconfidence and loose facts were over.

"One of the things new with this administration is if you don't know the answer, don't guess," he said in January. "Just say you don't know the answer." - Medical advice? Lol

 

Lol

 

About overconfidence, and loose facts, Lol

 

Fauci, March 3, 2020: 

 

"Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, said that the earliest the US could possibly get a vaccine would be in 12 or even 18 months — "at least.!"

"Even a year-and-a-half would be staggeringly fast for vaccine development, and some experts have voiced concerns that a vaccine produced on that timeline could hurtle too quickly through safety trials."

https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-vaccine-quest-18-months-fauci-experts-flag-dangers-testing-2020-4

 

Trump, May 15, 2020

"Coronavirus vaccine could come this year, Trump ..."
"President Trump claimed that a coronavirus vaccine could come within months, even as experts and vaccine developers say it's a year away.
https://www.nbcnews.com › politics › donald-trump › f...

 

Fact Checking MSM  NBC, CNN, CBS WashPost, all agreed with Fauci.

 

Fact and Reality:

 

December 11, 2020

"FDA Takes Key Action in Fight Against COVID-19 By Issuing Emergency Use Authorization for First COVID-19 Vaccine"

"Action Follows Thorough Evaluation of Available Safety, Effectiveness, and Manufacturing Quality Information by FDA Career Scientists, Input from Independent Experts

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19

 

Now, as always, in politics, "follow the money".

 

Taxpayer paid  Medical Officer, or Biden COVID policy publicist? 

 

Forbes -  "Dr. Anthony Fauci: The Highest Paid Employee In The Entire U.S. Federal Government"

 

"Dr. Anthony Fauci made $417,608 in 2019, the latest year for which federal salaries are available. That made him not only the highest paid doctor in the federal government, but the highest paid out of all four million federal employees. (he's also a CNN go to regular)

 

"Dr. Fauci, however, has taken the lead role in pandemic-related public outreach efforts for the last 18 months. American taxpayers might wonder why they’re footing the bill for Dr. Fauci’s salary when they’re already paying for a small army of public affairs professionals.

 

"In fact, Dr. Fauci even made more than the $400,000 salary of the President of the United States. All salary data was collected by OpenTheBooks.com via Freedom of Information Act requests.

 

"Furthermore, since the release of Dr. Fauci’s emails by The Washington Post and BuzzFeed, material questions have emerged as to whether the doctor misled the public during his media interviews.

 

Last week, National Geographic, Amazon AMZN -1.4%, and other booksellers removed a pre-sale option to purchase Dr. Fauci’s book from their websites after his contradictory emails became public.

 

For example, a National Geographic interview with Dr. Fauci from May 2020 is still posted on the outlet’s website entitled, “No Scientific Evidence The Coronavirus Was Made In A Chinese Lab.” However, Dr. Fauci recently admitted further investigation is necessary and his emails show he was alerted to the lab-leak theory as early as February 2020.

 

See more at:

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/06/15/dr-anthony-faucis-400-media-events-cost-taxpayers-during-the-pandemic/?sh=fd0ff6712c31

 

On the other hand, with no known political connections:

 

Richard H. "Ebright was appointed as a faculty member in the Department of Chemistry at Rutgers University and as a Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology in 1987.[1] He was co-appointed as an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute from 1997 to 2013.[1]

 

Ebright was appointed as a faculty member in the Department of Chemistry at Rutgers University and as a Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology in 1987.[1] He was co-appointed as an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute from 1997 to 2013.[1]

 

Ebright has performed research on protein-DNA interaction,[3][4][5] transcription initiation,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] transcription activation,[13][14][15][16][17][18] transcription-translation coupling,[19] and antibacterial drug discovery.[20][21][22][23][24][25] Ebright's research results include the experimental demonstration that amino-acid-base contacts mediate DNA sequence recognition in protein–DNA interaction,[3] the determination of the three-dimensional structural organization of the transcription initiation complex;[6][7][10][11] the demonstration that transcription start-site selection and initial transcription involve a "DNA scrunching" mechanism;[8][9][12] the demonstration that transcription activation can proceed by a "recruitment" mechanism;[13][14][15][17][18] the demonstration that bacterial transcription-translation coupling involves direct physical bridging of RNA polymerase and a ribosome by NusA and NusG;[19] and the identification of novel antibacterial drug targets in bacterial RNA polymerase.[20][21][22][23][24][25]

 

In 1994, Ebright was awarded the American Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Schering-Plough Award for his research on transcription activation.[26] In 1995, he received the Academic Press Walter J. Johnson Prize.[27] In 2013, he received a National Institutes of Health MERIT Award.[28] He was elected as a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology in 1996,[29] the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2004,[30] the Infectious Diseases Society of America in 2011,[31] and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2016.[32]

 

He has opposed the proliferation of laboratories working on biological weapons agents[33][34][35][36][37][38] and has supported the strengthening of biosafety and biosecurity measures to reduce risks of release of biological weapons.[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]

 

Ebright has stated that the genome and properties of SARS-CoV-2 provide no basis to conclude the virus was engineered as a bioweapon,[51][52] but he also has stated that the possibility that the virus entered humans through a laboratory accident cannot be dismissed[53][54][55][56][57] and has called for a thorough investigation of the origin of the pandemic and for measures to reduce the risk of future pandemics.[58][59][60][61][62] Ebright has accused NIAID director Tony Fauci, NIH director Francis Collins and deputy director Lawrence Tabak of "lying to the public", about their past and continuous denials of NIH funding having been utilized for banned gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.[63][64] -WIKI

 

He has no known political connections to the Swamp.

 

Feel free to chose your information sources!

 

Lol

 

 

 

 

Edited by trastrick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you have convinced yourself with your diligent research.Its the usual case of finding what you are looking for prevalent on all social media .

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.