Jump to content

Mr Trump - All discussion here

Recommended Posts

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46935701

 

Trump supporters showing their true colours. If it isn't white and male, they don't like it.

 

Immigrants protesting for a wall to keep immigrants out, whilst simultaneously attacking a member of the indigenous people. Ignorant at best.

 

Where did these children get their MAGA hats? From their parents I imagine. Racists at heart.

Edited by Bargepole23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Bargepole23 said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46935701

 

Trump supporters showing their true colours. If it isn't white and male, they don't like it.

 

Immigrants protesting for a wall to keep immigrants out, whilst simultaneously attacking a member of the indigenous people. Ignorant at best.

 

Where did these children get their MAGA hats? From their parents I imagine. Racists at heart.

Please point out the time in the video where he did anything other than stand there with his hands behind his back and not say anything whilst someone approached him and beat a drum in his face? I know you brown shirts and socialists take offence to everything but please point out what offended you. 

 

They were not protesting for a wall at all stop being so ignorant. They were waiting for buses after "The march for life" march. Their teachers told them to meet there.

 

Here is the video of the man approaching the boy and not the other way round.

 

 

Here is the full video... Point out the bit where he obstructs the man "whilst simultaneously attacking a member of the indigenous people".  

 

 

Here is another clip showing  the people you defend shout "but you give Faggots rights" At 7.15.  The obviously toxic young white men (according to you) all react in shock. You must be a homophobe though you support it.

 

 

I have seen calls for him to be expelled from school, followed the rest of his life, harass anyone who might employ him to make him unemployable, beaten and murdered all for standing there saying nothing .  The left and the media are going to try and destroy the lives of these children to advance their agenda. Child abusers at heart I assume. I wonder if you simpletons got that  from your parents.

 

Funny how this video hits every single news outlet after the Buzzfeed nuclear bomb they dropped on themselves the last few days. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, XXTickerXX said:

Please point out the time in the video where he did anything other than stand there with his hands behind his back and not say anything whilst someone approached him and beat a drum in his face? I know you brown shirts and socialists take offence to everything but please point out what offended you. 

 

They were not protesting for a wall at all stop being so ignorant. They were waiting for buses after "The march for life" march. Their teachers told them to meet there.

 

Here is the video of the man approaching the boy and not the other way round.

 

 

Here is the full video... Point out the bit where he obstructs the man "whilst simultaneously attacking a member of the indigenous people".  

 

 

Here is another clip showing  the people you defend shout "but you give Faggots rights" At 7.15.  The obviously toxic young white men (according to you) all react in shock. You must be a homophobe though you support it.

 

 

I have seen calls for him to be expelled from school, followed the rest of his life, harass anyone who might employ him to make him unemployable, beaten and murdered all for standing there saying nothing .  The left and the media are going to try and destroy the lives of these children to advance their agenda. Child abusers at heart I assume. I wonder if you simpletons got that  from your parents.

 

Funny how this video hits every single news outlet after the Buzzfeed nuclear bomb they dropped on themselves the last few days. 

 

 

Just to be clear, you're calling me a homophobe and a simpleton?

 

You couldn't be further from the truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Bargepole23 said:

Just to be clear, you're calling me a homophobe and a simpleton?

 

You couldn't be further from the truth.

Just to be clear. You jumped on a bandwagon with no basis in fact, generalised a whole group of people (Trump supporters showing their true colours), calling Immigrants protesting for a wall to keep immigrants out (when in fact they were trying to save babies in the March for life, also negating to think that Native Americans are immigrants too). You are part of the problem trying to ruin children's lives. You don't have to believe things because its on BBC news and facebook. So if you are not a simpleton then try not to act like one. And you sided immediately with massive homophobes who "want to deny faggots rights". 🤔

 

Even CNN's Jake Tapper is trying to walk the narrative back.

qda8xyv3gnb21.png

 

I hope they sue them out of existence.

 

2fs2sbw85ob21.jpg

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The latest update from the Washington Post shows that the pathological liar in the White House, at the end of his second year in office has made a staggering 8, 158 false or misleading claims so far. The rate at which he tells lies has risen sharply from 5.9 per day in year 1 to 16.5 a day in year 2, almost triple. What a colossal tool.

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/01/21/president-trump-made-false-or-misleading-claims-his-first-two-years/?fbclid=IwAR1JjifOlEXzxFF4jJkc9Nfn7dO0qNSLw02UpTD2HL39FeTxQboPYB3KU6s&utm_term=.bf277d460b3f

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/01/2019 at 17:00, Bargepole23 said:

Just to be clear, you're calling me a homophobe and a simpleton?

 

You couldn't be further from the truth.

Cant comment on the first point but would you agree that your post was wrong, unresearched and incorrectly accusing a set of students, and their parents of being racists?

 

Or do you still believe your post is accurate in the description of the students actions?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Scumbag - in - Chief reasserts his credentials as a woman hater by  having changed the definitions of what constitutes domestic abuse and sexual assault.  Now the definition for domestic violence is such that the law considers  '' physical harm that constitutes a felony or misdemeanour to be domestic violence – meaning other forms of domestic violence such as psychological abuse, coercive control and manipulation no longer fall under the department’s definition. ''

 

What will the changes mean? More men will get away with abusing women. More women will be unable to access help and recourse to the law.

There are a small number of posters on here (see the Gillette thread) who are clearly very threatened by the idea of women having equal rights, and an even smaller number who think that the sun shines out of Trump's backside but even they, I hope, can see this for what it is. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-domestic-abuse-sexual-assault-definition-womens-rights-justice-department-a8744546.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2qQ1wEwHrkUTvgJaRWeuxSNvitBF4GMVc36SSOHeW3K8FuqN6xzPPZ4ok#Echobox=1548350752

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Halibut said:

The Scumbag - in - Chief reasserts his credentials as a woman hater by  having changed the definitions of what constitutes domestic abuse and sexual assault.  Now the definition for domestic violence is such that the law considers  '' physical harm that constitutes a felony or misdemeanour to be domestic violence – meaning other forms of domestic violence such as psychological abuse, coercive control and manipulation no longer fall under the department’s definition. ''

 

What will the changes mean? More men will get away with abusing women. More women will be unable to access help and recourse to the law.

There are a small number of posters on here (see the Gillette thread) who are clearly very threatened by the idea of women having equal rights, and an even smaller number who think that the sun shines out of Trump's backside but even they, I hope, can see this for what it is. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-domestic-abuse-sexual-assault-definition-womens-rights-justice-department-a8744546.html?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR2qQ1wEwHrkUTvgJaRWeuxSNvitBF4GMVc36SSOHeW3K8FuqN6xzPPZ4ok#Echobox=1548350752

They changed the definition back in April. They underestimated the mental illness of the professional victims who can turn literally anything into some form of oppression. 

 

Yes men are clearly terrified of having equal rights. utterly terrified. I said as such to my female boss yesterday.

 

kn3w2bhejcc21.jpg

 

 

73uv.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.