Jump to content
Fancy running a forum? Sheffield Forum is for sale! Learn more

Do you buy in to the news conspiracy theories?

Recommended Posts

You are mixing up wholly different issues

 

1. Family courts have always been confidential. The proceedings involve children and domestic issues.

Whether I agree or not about that they are very different to CMP - there is no valid comparison in my view.

 

2. The procedure - it’s not a secret court at all - typical hyperbole without proper analysis of the reality - is very closely regulated indeed.

You will have read the quote from Neuberger - Parliament has decided that cases should be dealt with even if they involve sensitive national security issues and laid down a process so those cases could continue as opposed to he plug being pulled because security implications prevented material being considered.

 

Have you not heard of Public Interest Immunity applications Anna? Happen all

The time in criminal proceedings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back to the moon landings........

 

When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...

 

errr who is operating the camera????

 

The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images.

Edited by Crosser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Crosser said:

Back to the moon landings........

 

When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...

 

errr who is operating the camera????

 

The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images.

One of the clangers filmed it, are you daft? Oo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Crosser said:

Back to the moon landings........

 

When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...

 

errr who is operating the camera????

 

The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images.

Why don't you just look it up and find out?  I just did, it took all of ten seconds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Crosser said:

Back to the moon landings........

 

When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...

 

errr who is operating the camera????

 

The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images.

You forgot to ask who took the film out, took it to the local chemist, retrieved it and posted it back to earth?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Crosser said:

Back to the moon landings........

 

When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...

 

errr who is operating the camera????

 

The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images.

A NASA person did it. 

 

If it takes 2.5 seconds for a radio signal to travel between the earth and the moon then all the operator has to do is pan up at T minus 5 seconds on the Lunar module crew's countdown,  and the pan will start at 0 as it takes off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/24/2018 at 5:21 PM, Top Cats Hat said:

A NASA person did it. 

 

If it takes 2.5 seconds for a radio signal to travel between the earth and the moon then all the operator has to do is pan up at T minus 5 seconds on the Lunar module crew's countdown,  and the pan will start at 0 as it takes off.

But you would say that wouldn't you😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, taxman said:

But you would say that wouldn't you😉

The one thing that lunar conspiraloons have always failed explain is why the Soviets said nothing at the time. You can bet your bottom rouble that they tracked  Apollo 11 all the way to the moon and back as well as monitoring every transmission between the spacecraft and Mission Control in Houston! 😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out the harnesses obviously attacked to their t- shirts.

 

Astro - nots.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ever met a ridiculous conspiracy theory that you haven't immediately believed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MAC33 said:

Check out the harnesses obviously attacked to their t- shirts.

 

Astro - nots.

 

 

 

Do you really believe this BS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a query as to why your posts was removed, take it to the helpdesk. Any further accusations against the moderation team will result in your account being suspended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.