redfox   10 #385 Posted June 9, 2018 You are mixing up wholly different issues  1. Family courts have always been confidential. The proceedings involve children and domestic issues. Whether I agree or not about that they are very different to CMP - there is no valid comparison in my view.  2. The procedure - it’s not a secret court at all - typical hyperbole without proper analysis of the reality - is very closely regulated indeed. You will have read the quote from Neuberger - Parliament has decided that cases should be dealt with even if they involve sensitive national security issues and laid down a process so those cases could continue as opposed to he plug being pulled because security implications prevented material being considered.  Have you not heard of Public Interest Immunity applications Anna? Happen all The time in criminal proceedings. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Crosser   10 #386 Posted December 23, 2018 (edited) Back to the moon landings........  When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...  errr who is operating the camera????  The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images. Edited December 23, 2018 by Crosser Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
melthebell   862 #387 Posted December 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Crosser said: Back to the moon landings........  When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...  errr who is operating the camera????  The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images. One of the clangers filmed it, are you daft? Oo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #388 Posted December 23, 2018 4 hours ago, Crosser said: Back to the moon landings........  When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...  errr who is operating the camera????  The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images. Why don't you just look it up and find out?  I just did, it took all of ten seconds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
max   13 #389 Posted December 24, 2018 15 hours ago, Crosser said: Back to the moon landings........  When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...  errr who is operating the camera????  The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images. You forgot to ask who took the film out, took it to the local chemist, retrieved it and posted it back to earth?  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Top Cats Hat   10 #390 Posted December 24, 2018 21 hours ago, Crosser said: Back to the moon landings........  When the Lunar Lander leaves the moon (takes off for home) the camera pans up to follow it...  errr who is operating the camera????  The filming could be just left to run, but it wouldn't follow the trajectory of the lunar module, it would be static images. A NASA person did it.  If it takes 2.5 seconds for a radio signal to travel between the earth and the moon then all the operator has to do is pan up at T minus 5 seconds on the Lunar module crew's countdown,  and the pan will start at 0 as it takes off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
taxman   12 #391 Posted December 25, 2018 On 12/24/2018 at 5:21 PM, Top Cats Hat said: A NASA person did it.  If it takes 2.5 seconds for a radio signal to travel between the earth and the moon then all the operator has to do is pan up at T minus 5 seconds on the Lunar module crew's countdown,  and the pan will start at 0 as it takes off. But you would say that wouldn't you😉 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Top Cats Hat   10 #392 Posted December 25, 2018 4 hours ago, taxman said: But you would say that wouldn't you😉 The one thing that lunar conspiraloons have always failed explain is why the Soviets said nothing at the time. You can bet your bottom rouble that they tracked  Apollo 11 all the way to the moon and back as well as monitoring every transmission between the spacecraft and Mission Control in Houston! 😉 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
MAC33 Â Â 10 #393 Posted December 26, 2018 Check out the harnesses obviously attacked to their t- shirts. Â Astro - nots. Â Â Â Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cyclone   10 #394 Posted December 26, 2018 Have you ever met a ridiculous conspiracy theory that you haven't immediately believed? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Halibut   12 #395 Posted December 26, 2018 4 hours ago, MAC33 said: Check out the harnesses obviously attacked to their t- shirts.  Astro - nots.    Do you really believe this BS? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Vaati   11 #396 Posted December 26, 2018 If you have a query as to why your posts was removed, take it to the helpdesk. Any further accusations against the moderation team will result in your account being suspended. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...