The Consequences of Brexit [part 4]

[Puggie 10]

A bit more topically, with our Brexit-caused move I'm getting a 20% gross pay rise resulting in a 25+% net pay rise. This differential (relative to my current UK gross/net) just shows that the UK is not such a low-income tax country as many may believe.

 

Try res-non-dom with nill-rate on WW income that is born abroad and pegged to the USD.

 

We're both beneficiaries in very different ways

[L00b 441]

It was always going to be that way though, possibly? Macron was voted in on a low turnout because Le Pen was too much to stomach for most French people. Hollande started off with good ratings too, before they too plummetted.

It was always going to be that way, not so much due to the turnout, but in view of the expected consequences of Macron's electoral platform/program, compounded by his Parliamentarian majority at the ensuing GE: I expect that his approval ratings are dropping fast, because he is actually setting about implementing his program double-fast.

Anyway, congratulations on the new job and the pay rise. It's a shame that you are leaving but good luck with it all.

Thank you, that is very gracious of you.

Try res-non-dom with nill-rate on WW income that is born abroad and pegged to the USD.

 

We're both beneficiaries in very different ways

Ah, so assuming you res in the UK, you don't even pay your fair share in the UK?

 

I shall bear my moral high ground in our future exchanges

[Magilla 510]

It is going to be a big black hole, tell me when they last balance their accounts? Or at least get them signed off.

 

European Court of Auditors signs off the EU accounts for 9th year in a row

http://ec.europa.eu/budget/news/article_en.cfm?id=201610131243

 

So, last year......

[ez8004 10]

If there was any doubt:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/oct/30/facts-support-mps-claim-that-better-educated-voted-remain-pollster

 

Obviously, this will be discarded by many who refuse to accept facts. Shows a pattern doesn’t it?

[cgksheff 44]

If there was any doubt:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/oct/30/facts-support-mps-claim-that-better-educated-voted-remain-pollster

 

Obviously, this will be discarded by many who refuse to accept facts. Shows a pattern doesn’t it?

 

Do you take Mr Kellner's words as being literally factual?

[retep 68]

If there was any doubt:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/oct/30/facts-support-mps-claim-that-better-educated-voted-remain-pollster

 

Obviously, this will be discarded by many who refuse to accept facts. Shows a pattern doesn’t it?

 

Yes education is wasted on some.

[I1L2T3 10]

Do you take Mr Kellner's words as being literally factual?

 

Well, in terms of comparing the educational profile of voters with election and referendum results in constituencies Kellner is factually correct, as was the Labour MP.

 

In this case facts are facts.

 

---------- Post added 31-10-2017 at 08:39 ----------

 

Yes education is wasted on some.

 

Look, somebody has to pay for all the ready meals, take always, Amber Leaf and pina colada flavoured e-liquid.

 

And also fix you up when you’re ill

[Car Boot 10]

European Court of Auditors signs off the EU accounts for 9th year in a row

http://ec.europa.eu/budget/news/article_en.cfm?id=201610131243

 

So, last year......

 

Oh dear.

 

The EU accounts clearly show, yet again, that the auditors believe they are not free from material error and so have given them a qualified opinion.

 

Significant errors, well above the 2 per cent threshold, are present in the accounts. As they have been every year since 1995.

 

So the accounts have been 'signed off' as having significant material errors.

[retep 68]

Well, in terms of comparing the educational profile of voters with election and referendum results in constituencies Kellner is factually correct, as was the Labour MP.

 

In this case facts are facts.

 

---------- Post added 31-10-2017 at 08:39 ----------

 

 

Look, somebody has to pay for all the ready meals, take always, Amber Leaf and pina colada flavoured e-liquid.

 

And also fix you up when you’re ill

 

The labour mp who voted to trigger article 50.

[cgksheff 44]

Well, in terms of comparing the educational profile of voters with election and referendum results in constituencies Kellner is factually correct, as was the Labour MP.

 

In this case facts are facts.

...

 

But that is not what Mr Kellner said.

[sgtkate 10]

Oh dear.

 

The EU accounts clearly show, yet again, that the auditors believe they are not free from material error and so have given them a qualified opinion.

 

Significant errors, well above the 2 per cent threshold, are present in the accounts. As they have been every year since 1995.

 

So the accounts have been 'signed off' as having significant material errors.

 

What is the margin of error in the UKs accounts?

[I1L2T3 10]

But that is not what Mr Kellner said.

 

It is actually. He made a factual comparison between results and educational profiles in various constituencies.

 

---------- Post added 31-10-2017 at 09:06 ----------

 

Oh dear.

 

The EU accounts clearly show, yet again, that the auditors believe they are not free from material error and so have given them a qualified opinion.

 

Significant errors, well above the 2 per cent threshold, are present in the accounts. As they have been every year since 1995.

 

So the accounts have been 'signed off' as having significant material errors.

 

This happens at small and large companies too. No large company ever has 100% accurate accounts. Just look at the number of amended accounts that get submitted to companies house.

 

Just for reference look at how often UK government accounts are retrospectively revised.

 

Why is there a special requirement for EU accounts to be 100% error free?