Paul Nuttall UKIP Leader - Billy Liar

[NigelFargate 10]

How incongruous it would be for him to enter Parliament, that temple of truth and moral probity, where terminological inexactitudes, self-serving statements of questionable accuracy and outright falsehoods and have never been uttered.

[unbeliever 10]

• Guns don't kill people. Paul Nuttall kills people.

• Paul Nuttall played Russian Roulette with a fully loaded gun and won.

• Paul Nuttall is the only person who can simultaneously hold and fire FIVE Uzis: One in each hand, one in each foot – and the 5th one he roundhouse-kicks into the air, so that it sprays bullets.

• James Bond uses a silencer, Paul Nuttall uses a loudener

• The meteor that killed the dinosaur was actually a bullet from Paul Nuttall.

• Guns take shooting lessons from Paul Nuttall.

[Mister M 1,608]

How incongruous it would be for him to enter Parliament, that temple of truth and moral probity, where terminological inexactitudes, self-serving statements of questionable accuracy and outright falsehoods and have never been uttered.

 

Okay, some MPs and government ministers have lied in the past, and will in the future.... But in fairness, UKIP, and Paul Nuttall in particular have attacked Labour especially on a very personal basis. That Labour are the self serving metropolitan elite; they are the establishment, they are namby pamby, middle class hand wringing do-gooders.

According to Nuttall, UKIP are the real deal. They are now the voice of the working class. How ironic therefore that the public image of Nuttall as the authentic voice of the working class should be so quickly revealed as a sham.

[LeMaquis 10]

UKIP members seem to be as charmless as Nuttall. One is caught urinating on a fence and trying to force his way into a pensioner's house while out leafletting for Nuttall.

 

http://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/video-ukip-member-caught-on-cctv-urinating-and-trying-to-push-way-into-oap-s-home-in-stoke-central/story-30147297-detail/story.html

[NigelFargate 10]

UKIP members seem to be as charmless as Nuttall. One is caught urinating on a fence and trying to force his way into a pensioner's house while out leafletting for Nuttall.

 

http://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/video-ukip-member-caught-on-cctv-urinating-and-trying-to-push-way-into-oap-s-home-in-stoke-central/story-30147297-detail/story.html

 

The Labour candidate in Stoke is not overflowing with charm either.

[sgtkate 10]

The Labour candidate in Stoke is not overflowing with charm either.

 

It's a fight to the bottom in Stoke isn't it?

[LeMaquis 10]

The Labour candidate in Stoke is not overflowing with charm either.

 

I don't think he's urinated on anyone's fence in broad daylight or forced senior members of his own party to quit because of his lies about the most sensitive issue in Liverpool for decades.

[NigelFargate 10]

I don't think he's urinated on anyone's fence in broad daylight or forced senior members of his own party to quit because of his lies about the most sensitive issue in Liverpool for decades.

 

Had the Labour candidate in Stoke been leader of his party, I would expect that there might well have been resignations, particularly from the female party members. This candidate will probably win Stoke (he is odds on with the bookies) but in some respects I would say that he is of an even lower calibre than Nuttall.

[LeMaquis 10]

Had the Labour candidate in Stoke been leader of his party, I would expect that there might well have been resignations, particularly from the female party members. This candidate will probably win Stoke (he is odds on with the bookies) but in some respects I would say that he is of an even lower calibre than Nuttall.

 

So the way you support Nuttall's lies is to tell a few more. There's UKIP for you.

 

If you want to defend UKIP you'd be better off not supporting a leader who has become a national joke. If Nuttall loses Stoke both he and UKIP are finished because he has set everything on winning the white working class from Labour. If he fails to win Stoke because of his own personal incompetence it's bye bye Nuttall.

 

You ought to think about that instead of telling even more lies.

[NigelFargate 10]

So the way you support Nuttall's lies is to tell a few more. There's UKIP for you.

 

If you want to defend UKIP you'd be better off not supporting a leader who has become a national joke. If Nuttall loses Stoke both he and UKIP are finished because he has set everything on winning the white working class from Labour. If he fails to win Stoke because of his own personal incompetence it's bye bye Nuttall.

 

You ought to think about that instead of telling even more lies.

 

I am neither defending Nuttall nor UKIP. Could you care to inform me what 'lies' I have told? I am pointing out to the gloatfesters on this thread that there are many other politicians who have told lies for political or financial gain - for example, MPs who 'flipped' their second homes during the expenses scandal years in order to claim huge amounts in mortgage relief and to avoid CGT. Or those who told us lies about WMDs (did all of the MPs actually believe the official narrative?).

[LeMaquis 10]

I am neither defending Nuttall nor UKIP. Could you care to inform me what 'lies' I have told?

 

You said that the Labour candidate is of an even lower calibre that Nuttall. He'd have to be a paedophile to manage that but you offered no evidence. You're only interested in defending the indefensible by saying that others are even more indefensible. It won't wash but if you'd care to wash that pensioner's back fence that would be nice of you.

[chalga 10]

Had the Labour candidate in Stoke been leader of his party, I would expect that there might well have been resignations, particularly from the female party members. This candidate will probably win Stoke (he is odds on with the bookies) but in some respects I would say that he is of an even lower calibre than Nuttall.

 

So the answer you have is to make up a story of what might have been if things had been different.