raizuli3   12 #109 Posted February 21, 2017 much more preferable lol ---------- Post added 21-02-2017 at 08:23 ----------   think you will find its highways/council land fenced or not its not a place for tents.  Dead right !!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
byeo   10 #110 Posted February 21, 2017 and replace it with a billboard of a naked women promoting the latest perfume?  Show me a billboard in the UK which shows a naked woman promoting the latest perfume, please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
geared   318 #111 Posted February 21, 2017 Trespass on public land, that isn't fenced off?  Is it considered part of the highway?  Show me a billboard in the UK which shows a naked woman promoting the latest perfume, please.  Me too, I've got a good half hour or so to stand and gawp :hihi: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Penistone999 Â Â 10 #112 Posted February 21, 2017 and replace it with a billboard of a naked women promoting the latest perfume? Â As long as that eyesore which is the squat is removed ASAP , thats the priority. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
achorste   10 #113 Posted February 21, 2017 As long as that eyesore which is the squat is removed ASAP , thats the priority.  Shouldn't the priority be bringing these people (human beings!) back into society, enable them to contribute in a positive manner and look after themselves? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
maggidee   10 #114 Posted February 21, 2017 what an advert for sheffield, why not go in a local park instead and not be a distraction for drivers, if a car came of the roundabout into them whose at fault? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
chorizofreak   10 #115 Posted February 21, 2017 Shouldn't the priority be bringing these people (human beings!) back into society, enable them to contribute in a positive manner and look after themselves?  they are there by choice its a lifestyle they dont want to contribute just attack the establishment and capital system they are doing what they know will tug some heart strings...not mine:mad: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
WarPig   78 #116 Posted February 21, 2017 if a car came of the roundabout into them whose at fault?  And a car did just that very recently. That could have caused multiple fatalities. I couldn't sleep in a tent knowing fast moving traffic was just inches from me. They are idiots. Unless of course they are mostly unoccupied, and erected there just for visual effect? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
alchemist   37 #117 Posted February 21, 2017 And a car did just that very recently. That could have caused multiple fatalities. I couldn't sleep in a tent knowing fast moving traffic was just inches from me. They are idiots. Unless of course they are mostly unoccupied, and erected there just for visual effect?  Well if occupy sheffield, aka camp casper, was anything to go on there will be only the one tent occupied and that will be between 9-5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
LeMaquis   10 #118 Posted February 21, 2017 ....if a car came of the roundabout into them whose at fault?  The driver for not driving safely. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
Cyclone   10 #119 Posted February 21, 2017 much more preferable lol ---------- Post added 21-02-2017 at 08:23 ----------   think you will find its highways/council land fenced or not its not a place for tents.  Which doesn't make it trespass does it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...
cgksheff   44 #120 Posted February 21, 2017 Most of the posts are irrelevant.  The tents are there as part of a "protest". Whether any tents are occupied by a person that is unable to be given accommodation by the support services may be unlikely.  SCC will probably have a court application for removal of the tents. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Share this content via...